PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
IBTL.L vs. SWDA.L
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

IBTL.L vs. SWDA.L - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a £10,000 investment in iShares USD Treasury Bond 20+yr UCITS ETF (Dist) (IBTL.L) and iShares Core MSCI World UCITS ETF USD (Acc) (SWDA.L). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, IBTL.L achieves a -1.02% return, which is significantly lower than SWDA.L's 9.92% return. Over the past 10 years, IBTL.L has underperformed SWDA.L with an annualized return of -0.81%, while SWDA.L has yielded a comparatively higher 14.05% annualized return.


IBTL.L

1D
-0.23%
1M
1.40%
YTD
-1.02%
6M
-2.44%
1Y
5.37%
3Y*
-4.19%
5Y*
-5.14%
10Y*
-0.81%

SWDA.L

1D
-0.25%
1M
5.16%
YTD
9.92%
6M
10.29%
1Y
27.16%
3Y*
17.83%
5Y*
13.02%
10Y*
14.05%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

IBTL.L vs. SWDA.L - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)202520242023202220212020201920182017
IBTL.L
iShares USD Treasury Bond 20+yr UCITS ETF (Dist)
-1.02%-2.80%-5.50%-3.62%-22.17%-3.32%13.07%12.05%3.06%-0.04%
SWDA.L
iShares Core MSCI World UCITS ETF USD (Acc)
9.92%12.64%21.11%17.59%-8.33%23.64%12.25%23.03%-3.78%11.78%

Correlation

The correlation between IBTL.L and SWDA.L is 0.20, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.20

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.13

Correlation (5Y)
Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.01

Correlation (10Y)
Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.02

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Feb 2, 2015

0.02

The correlation between IBTL.L and SWDA.L shifts across timeframes, from 0.01 (5 years) to 0.20 (1 year), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

IBTL.L vs. SWDA.L — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

IBTL.L
IBTL.L Risk / Return Rank: 1717
Overall Rank
IBTL.L Sharpe Ratio Rank: 1818
Sharpe Ratio Rank
IBTL.L Sortino Ratio Rank: 1717
Sortino Ratio Rank
IBTL.L Omega Ratio Rank: 1616
Omega Ratio Rank
IBTL.L Calmar Ratio Rank: 1717
Calmar Ratio Rank
IBTL.L Martin Ratio Rank: 1616
Martin Ratio Rank

SWDA.L
SWDA.L Risk / Return Rank: 8181
Overall Rank
SWDA.L Sharpe Ratio Rank: 8080
Sharpe Ratio Rank
SWDA.L Sortino Ratio Rank: 8181
Sortino Ratio Rank
SWDA.L Omega Ratio Rank: 8282
Omega Ratio Rank
SWDA.L Calmar Ratio Rank: 7979
Calmar Ratio Rank
SWDA.L Martin Ratio Rank: 8181
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

IBTL.L vs. SWDA.L - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for iShares USD Treasury Bond 20+yr UCITS ETF (Dist) (IBTL.L) and iShares Core MSCI World UCITS ETF USD (Acc) (SWDA.L). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


IBTL.LSWDA.LDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

-2.09

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

-2.80

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.10

1.51

-0.41

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

0.65

4.13

-3.48

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

1.41

16.50

-15.10

IBTL.L vs. SWDA.L - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current IBTL.L Sharpe Ratio is 0.56, which is lower than the SWDA.L Sharpe Ratio of 2.66. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of IBTL.L and SWDA.L, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Sharpe Ratios by Period


IBTL.LSWDA.LDifference

Sharpe Ratio (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.56

2.66

-2.09

Sharpe Ratio (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

-0.33

0.98

-1.31

Sharpe Ratio (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

-0.05

0.97

-1.02

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

-0.03

0.88

-0.91

Drawdowns

IBTL.L vs. SWDA.L - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum IBTL.L drawdown since its inception was -48.85%, which is greater than SWDA.L's maximum drawdown of -25.58%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for IBTL.L and SWDA.L.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


IBTL.LSWDA.LDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-48.85%

-25.58%

-23.27%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-8.25%

-6.55%

-1.70%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-17.70%

-18.50%

+0.80%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-39.35%

-18.50%

-20.85%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-48.85%

-25.58%

-23.27%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-45.46%

-0.25%

-45.21%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-23.74%

-3.49%

-20.25%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

3.80%

1.64%

+2.16%

Volatility

IBTL.L vs. SWDA.L - Volatility Comparison

iShares USD Treasury Bond 20+yr UCITS ETF (Dist) (IBTL.L) and iShares Core MSCI World UCITS ETF USD (Acc) (SWDA.L) have volatilities of 2.42% and 2.52%, respectively, indicating that both stocks experience similar levels of price fluctuations. This suggests that the risk associated with both stocks, as measured by volatility, is nearly the same. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


IBTL.LSWDA.LDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

2.42%

2.52%

-0.10%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

6.55%

7.30%

-0.75%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

9.53%

10.23%

-0.70%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

15.48%

13.30%

+2.18%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

16.54%

14.50%

+2.04%

IBTL.L vs. SWDA.L - Expense Ratio Comparison

IBTL.L has a 0.07% expense ratio, which is lower than SWDA.L's 0.20% expense ratio. Despite the difference, both funds are considered low-cost compared to the broader market, where average expense ratios usually range from 0.3% to 0.9%.


Dividends

IBTL.L vs. SWDA.L - Dividend Comparison

IBTL.L's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 4.36%, while SWDA.L has not paid dividends to shareholders.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
IBTL.L
iShares USD Treasury Bond 20+yr UCITS ETF (Dist)
4.36%4.32%4.59%3.78%2.96%1.72%1.86%2.54%2.75%2.66%2.44%2.07%
SWDA.L
iShares Core MSCI World UCITS ETF USD (Acc)
0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%

Frequently Asked Questions


IBTL.L and SWDA.L have a correlation of 0.20, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

On fees, IBTL.L is cheaper at 0.07% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

IBTL.L is cheaper with a 0.07% expense ratio, compared with 0.20% for SWDA.L.

IBTL.L is categorized as Government Bonds, while SWDA.L is Global Equities. IBTL.L tracks ICE U.S. Treasury 20+ Year Bond Index, while SWDA.L tracks MSCI World Index. Their fees differ too: 0.07% for IBTL.L and 0.20% for SWDA.L.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for IBTL.L and SWDA.L

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer