IBTK vs. MGOV
IBTK (iShares iBonds Dec 2030 Term Treasury ETF) and MGOV (First Trust Intermediate Government Opportunities ETF) are both Government Bonds funds. IBTK is passively managed, while MGOV is actively managed. Over the past year, IBTK returned 3.46% vs 6.73% for MGOV. Their correlation of 0.88 suggests significant overlap in exposure. IBTK charges 0.07%/yr vs 0.65%/yr for MGOV.
Performance
IBTK vs. MGOV - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, IBTK achieves a -0.34% return, which is significantly lower than MGOV's 0.19% return.
IBTK
- 1D
- -0.13%
- 1M
- -0.14%
- YTD
- -0.34%
- 6M
- -0.40%
- 1Y
- 3.46%
- 3Y*
- 3.17%
- 5Y*
- -0.54%
- 10Y*
- —
MGOV
- 1D
- -0.20%
- 1M
- -0.19%
- YTD
- 0.19%
- 6M
- -0.01%
- 1Y
- 6.73%
- 3Y*
- —
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
IBTK vs. MGOV - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|
IBTK iShares iBonds Dec 2030 Term Treasury ETF | -0.34% | 7.41% | 1.18% | 3.93% |
MGOV First Trust Intermediate Government Opportunities ETF | 0.19% | 8.54% | 1.55% | 4.56% |
Correlation
The correlation between IBTK and MGOV is 0.80, which is moderate. They share some common price drivers but move independently often enough to provide real diversification benefit when combined.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.80 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Aug 4, 2023 | 0.88 |
The correlation between IBTK and MGOV has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.80 to 0.88 - a consistent structural relationship.
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
IBTK vs. MGOV — Risk / Return Rank
IBTK
MGOV
IBTK vs. MGOV - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for iShares iBonds Dec 2030 Term Treasury ETF (IBTK) and First Trust Intermediate Government Opportunities ETF (MGOV). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
| IBTK | MGOV | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | -0.32 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | -0.43 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.20 | 1.26 | -0.06 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 1.51 | 1.92 | -0.41 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 4.39 | 5.87 | -1.48 |
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month. | |||
Loading charts...
Sharpe Ratios by Period
| IBTK | MGOV | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe Ratio (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 1.13 | 1.46 | -0.32 |
Sharpe Ratio (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | -0.08 | — | — |
Sharpe Ratio (All Time)Calculated using the full available price history | -0.25 | 0.88 | -1.13 |
Drawdowns
IBTK vs. MGOV - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum IBTK drawdown since its inception was -22.84%, which is greater than MGOV's maximum drawdown of -6.11%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for IBTK and MGOV.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| IBTK | MGOV | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -22.84% | -6.11% | -16.73% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -2.31% | -3.53% | +1.22% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -6.05% | — | — |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -19.22% | — | — |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -9.87% | -2.38% | -7.49% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -12.57% | -1.62% | -10.95% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 0.79% | 1.15% | -0.36% |
Volatility
IBTK vs. MGOV - Volatility Comparison
The current volatility for iShares iBonds Dec 2030 Term Treasury ETF (IBTK) is 0.87%, while First Trust Intermediate Government Opportunities ETF (MGOV) has a volatility of 1.70%. This indicates that IBTK experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than MGOV based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| IBTK | MGOV | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 0.87% | 1.70% | -0.83% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 2.03% | 3.22% | -1.19% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 3.07% | 4.64% | -1.57% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 6.78% | 5.95% | +0.83% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 6.57% | 5.95% | +0.62% |
IBTK vs. MGOV - Expense Ratio Comparison
IBTK has a 0.07% expense ratio, which is lower than MGOV's 0.65% expense ratio.
Dividends
IBTK vs. MGOV - Dividend Comparison
IBTK's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 3.80%, less than MGOV's 4.98% yield.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
IBTK iShares iBonds Dec 2030 Term Treasury ETF | 3.80% | 3.79% | 3.93% | 3.05% | 2.27% | 0.84% | 0.26% |
MGOV First Trust Intermediate Government Opportunities ETF | 4.98% | 4.95% | 5.05% | 1.47% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
Frequently Asked Questions
IBTK and MGOV have a correlation of 0.80, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
MGOV has higher volatility (1.70%) compared to IBTK (0.87%). In terms of maximum drawdown, IBTK dropped -22.84% vs MGOV's -6.11%.
On 1-year performance, MGOV leads with 6.73% vs 3.46% for IBTK. On fees, IBTK is cheaper at 0.07% per year. On volatility, IBTK has been the lower-risk option at 0.87%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
Over the 1-year period, MGOV has performed better with a 6.73% return vs 3.46%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.
IBTK is cheaper with a 0.07% expense ratio, compared with 0.65% for MGOV.
MGOV has the higher dividend yield at 4.98%, compared with 3.80% for IBTK.
They also come from different issuers: iShares and First Trust. Their fees differ too: 0.07% for IBTK and 0.65% for MGOV.
MGOV currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (1.46 vs 1.13), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.
Find the right allocation for IBTK and MGOV
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer