PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
IBTK vs. IVV
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

IBTK vs. IVV - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in iShares iBonds Dec 2030 Term Treasury ETF (IBTK) and iShares Core S&P 500 ETF (IVV). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, IBTK achieves a -0.34% return, which is significantly lower than IVV's 10.85% return.


IBTK

1D
-0.13%
1M
-0.14%
YTD
-0.34%
6M
-0.40%
1Y
3.46%
3Y*
3.17%
5Y*
-0.54%
10Y*

IVV

1D
-0.76%
1M
4.97%
YTD
10.85%
6M
10.87%
1Y
28.00%
3Y*
22.43%
5Y*
13.88%
10Y*
15.54%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

IBTK vs. IVV - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)202520242023202220212020
IBTK
iShares iBonds Dec 2030 Term Treasury ETF
-0.34%7.41%1.18%4.05%-14.71%-3.76%-1.90%
IVV
iShares Core S&P 500 ETF
10.85%17.85%24.93%26.31%-18.16%28.76%16.30%

Correlation

The correlation between IBTK and IVV is 0.17, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.17

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.12

Correlation (5Y)
Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.07

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Jul 21, 2020

0.07

The correlation between IBTK and IVV shifts across timeframes, from 0.07 (all time) to 0.17 (1 year), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

IBTK vs. IVV — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

IBTK
IBTK Risk / Return Rank: 3131
Overall Rank
IBTK Sharpe Ratio Rank: 3232
Sharpe Ratio Rank
IBTK Sortino Ratio Rank: 3333
Sortino Ratio Rank
IBTK Omega Ratio Rank: 2929
Omega Ratio Rank
IBTK Calmar Ratio Rank: 3131
Calmar Ratio Rank
IBTK Martin Ratio Rank: 3030
Martin Ratio Rank

IVV
IVV Risk / Return Rank: 7070
Overall Rank
IVV Sharpe Ratio Rank: 7171
Sharpe Ratio Rank
IVV Sortino Ratio Rank: 7070
Sortino Ratio Rank
IVV Omega Ratio Rank: 7070
Omega Ratio Rank
IVV Calmar Ratio Rank: 6262
Calmar Ratio Rank
IVV Martin Ratio Rank: 7575
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

IBTK vs. IVV - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for iShares iBonds Dec 2030 Term Treasury ETF (IBTK) and iShares Core S&P 500 ETF (IVV). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


IBTKIVVDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

-1.25

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

-1.52

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.20

1.43

-0.23

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

1.51

3.17

-1.66

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

4.39

14.71

-10.32

IBTK vs. IVV - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current IBTK Sharpe Ratio is 1.13, which is lower than the IVV Sharpe Ratio of 2.39. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of IBTK and IVV, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Sharpe Ratios by Period


IBTKIVVDifference

Sharpe Ratio (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

1.13

2.39

-1.25

Sharpe Ratio (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

-0.08

0.83

-0.91

Sharpe Ratio (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.86

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

-0.25

0.45

-0.70

Drawdowns

IBTK vs. IVV - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum IBTK drawdown since its inception was -22.84%, smaller than the maximum IVV drawdown of -55.25%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for IBTK and IVV.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


IBTKIVVDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-22.84%

-55.25%

+32.41%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-2.31%

-8.89%

+6.58%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-6.05%

-18.75%

+12.70%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-19.22%

-24.53%

+5.31%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-33.90%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-9.87%

-0.76%

-9.11%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-12.57%

-10.78%

-1.79%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

0.79%

1.91%

-1.12%

Volatility

IBTK vs. IVV - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for iShares iBonds Dec 2030 Term Treasury ETF (IBTK) is 0.87%, while iShares Core S&P 500 ETF (IVV) has a volatility of 2.87%. This indicates that IBTK experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than IVV based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


IBTKIVVDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

0.87%

2.87%

-2.00%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

2.03%

8.90%

-6.87%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

3.07%

11.80%

-8.73%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

6.78%

16.88%

-10.10%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

6.57%

18.05%

-11.48%

IBTK vs. IVV - Expense Ratio Comparison

IBTK has a 0.07% expense ratio, which is higher than IVV's 0.03% expense ratio. However, both funds are considered low-cost compared to the broader market, where average expense ratios usually range from 0.3% to 0.9%.


Dividends

IBTK vs. IVV - Dividend Comparison

IBTK's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 3.80%, more than IVV's 1.06% yield.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
IBTK
iShares iBonds Dec 2030 Term Treasury ETF
3.80%3.79%3.93%3.05%2.27%0.84%0.26%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%
IVV
iShares Core S&P 500 ETF
1.06%1.17%1.30%1.44%1.66%1.20%1.57%1.85%2.21%1.75%2.01%2.27%

Frequently Asked Questions


IBTK and IVV have a correlation of 0.17, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

IVV has higher volatility (2.87%) compared to IBTK (0.87%). In terms of maximum drawdown, IBTK dropped -22.84% vs IVV's -55.25%.

On 5-year performance, IVV leads with 13.88% vs -0.54% for IBTK. On fees, IVV is cheaper at 0.03% per year. On volatility, IBTK has been the lower-risk option at 0.87%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Over the 5-year period, IVV has performed better with a 13.88% return vs -0.54%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.

IVV is cheaper with a 0.03% expense ratio, compared with 0.07% for IBTK.

IBTK has the higher dividend yield at 3.80%, compared with 1.06% for IVV.

IBTK is categorized as Government Bonds, while IVV is S&P 500. IBTK tracks ICE 2030 Maturity US Treasury Index, while IVV tracks S&P 500 Index. Their fees differ too: 0.07% for IBTK and 0.03% for IVV.

IVV currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (2.39 vs 1.13), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for IBTK and IVV

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer