IBTK vs. CSCO
IBTK (iShares iBonds Dec 2030 Term Treasury ETF) is Government Bonds fund tracking the ICE 2030 Maturity US Treasury Index, while CSCO (Cisco Systems, Inc.) is a stock. Over the past 5 years, IBTK returned -0.54%/yr vs 21.97%/yr for CSCO. At a 0.02 correlation, their price movements are largely independent.
Performance
IBTK vs. CSCO - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, IBTK achieves a -0.34% return, which is significantly lower than CSCO's 66.00% return.
IBTK
- 1D
- -0.13%
- 1M
- -0.14%
- YTD
- -0.34%
- 6M
- -0.40%
- 1Y
- 3.46%
- 3Y*
- 3.17%
- 5Y*
- -0.54%
- 10Y*
- —
CSCO
- 1D
- -1.17%
- 1M
- 36.56%
- YTD
- 66.00%
- 6M
- 64.46%
- 1Y
- 101.07%
- 3Y*
- 40.06%
- 5Y*
- 21.97%
- 10Y*
- 19.37%
IBTK vs. CSCO - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
IBTK iShares iBonds Dec 2030 Term Treasury ETF | -0.34% | 7.41% | 1.18% | 4.05% | -14.71% | -3.76% | -1.90% |
CSCO Cisco Systems, Inc. | 66.00% | 33.47% | 21.00% | 9.30% | -22.46% | 45.76% | -3.85% |
Correlation
The correlation between IBTK and CSCO is -0.04, meaning there is essentially no relationship between their price movements. Each responds to its own set of market drivers, making them strong candidates for combining in a diversified portfolio.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | -0.04 |
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period | 0.00 |
Correlation (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.03 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Jul 21, 2020 | 0.02 |
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
IBTK vs. CSCO — Risk / Return Rank
IBTK
CSCO
IBTK vs. CSCO - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for iShares iBonds Dec 2030 Term Treasury ETF (IBTK) and Cisco Systems, Inc. (CSCO). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
| IBTK | CSCO | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | -2.27 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | -2.26 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.20 | 1.61 | -0.41 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 1.51 | 7.49 | -5.98 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 4.39 | 21.00 | -16.61 |
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month. | |||
Loading charts...
Sharpe Ratios by Period
| IBTK | CSCO | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe Ratio (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 1.13 | 3.40 | -2.27 |
Sharpe Ratio (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | -0.08 | 0.90 | -0.98 |
Sharpe Ratio (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | — | 0.75 | — |
Sharpe Ratio (All Time)Calculated using the full available price history | -0.25 | 0.61 | -0.86 |
Drawdowns
IBTK vs. CSCO - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum IBTK drawdown since its inception was -22.84%, smaller than the maximum CSCO drawdown of -89.26%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for IBTK and CSCO.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| IBTK | CSCO | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -22.84% | -89.26% | +66.42% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -2.31% | -13.57% | +11.26% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -6.05% | -20.16% | +14.11% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -19.22% | -36.68% | +17.46% |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | — | -41.95% | — |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -9.87% | -1.17% | -8.70% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -12.57% | -40.14% | +27.57% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 0.79% | 4.83% | -4.04% |
Volatility
IBTK vs. CSCO - Volatility Comparison
The current volatility for iShares iBonds Dec 2030 Term Treasury ETF (IBTK) is 0.87%, while Cisco Systems, Inc. (CSCO) has a volatility of 15.37%. This indicates that IBTK experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than CSCO based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| IBTK | CSCO | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 0.87% | 15.37% | -14.50% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 2.03% | 25.85% | -23.82% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 3.07% | 29.87% | -26.80% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 6.78% | 24.62% | -17.84% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 6.57% | 25.76% | -19.19% |
Dividends
IBTK vs. CSCO - Dividend Comparison
IBTK's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 3.80%, more than CSCO's 1.30% yield.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
CSCO Cisco Systems, Inc. | 1.30% | 2.12% | 2.69% | 3.07% | 3.17% | 2.32% | 3.20% | 2.88% | 2.95% | 2.95% | 3.28% | 3.02% |
IBTK iShares iBonds Dec 2030 Term Treasury ETF | 3.80% | 3.79% | 3.93% | 3.05% | 2.27% | 0.84% | 0.26% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
Frequently Asked Questions
IBTK and CSCO have a correlation of -0.04, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
CSCO has higher volatility (15.37%) compared to IBTK (0.87%). In terms of maximum drawdown, IBTK dropped -22.84% vs CSCO's -89.26%.
CSCO currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (3.40 vs 1.13), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.
Find the right allocation for IBTK and CSCO
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer