IBTJ vs. VGSH
IBTJ (iShares iBonds Dec 2029 Term Treasury ETF) and VGSH (Vanguard Short-Term Treasury ETF) are both Government Bonds funds - IBTJ tracks the ICE 2029 Maturity US Treasury Index while VGSH tracks the Bloomberg U.S. Treasury 1-3 Year Index. Both are passively managed. Over the past 5 years, IBTJ returned 0.06%/yr vs 1.81%/yr for VGSH. Their correlation of 0.80 suggests significant overlap in exposure. IBTJ charges 0.07%/yr vs 0.03%/yr for VGSH.
Performance
IBTJ vs. VGSH - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, IBTJ achieves a -0.10% return, which is significantly lower than VGSH's 0.48% return.
IBTJ
- 1D
- -0.14%
- 1M
- -0.10%
- YTD
- -0.10%
- 6M
- 0.01%
- 1Y
- 3.49%
- 3Y*
- 3.51%
- 5Y*
- 0.06%
- 10Y*
- —
VGSH
- 1D
- -0.03%
- 1M
- 0.08%
- YTD
- 0.48%
- 6M
- 0.74%
- 1Y
- 3.43%
- 3Y*
- 4.15%
- 5Y*
- 1.81%
- 10Y*
- 1.74%
IBTJ vs. VGSH - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
IBTJ iShares iBonds Dec 2029 Term Treasury ETF | -0.10% | 6.89% | 1.82% | 4.49% | -12.45% | -3.57% | 3.50% |
VGSH Vanguard Short-Term Treasury ETF | 0.48% | 5.07% | 4.00% | 4.31% | -3.86% | -0.60% | 1.57% |
Correlation
The correlation between IBTJ and VGSH is 0.94, indicating a strong positive relationship between their price movements. Combining them offers limited diversification - they tend to fall together during downturns.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.94 |
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period | 0.90 |
Correlation (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.86 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Mar 2, 2020 | 0.80 |
The correlation between IBTJ and VGSH shifts across timeframes, from 0.80 (all time) to 0.94 (1 year), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
IBTJ vs. VGSH — Risk / Return Rank
IBTJ
VGSH
IBTJ vs. VGSH - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for iShares iBonds Dec 2029 Term Treasury ETF (IBTJ) and Vanguard Short-Term Treasury ETF (VGSH). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
| IBTJ | VGSH | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | -1.24 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | -2.19 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.26 | 1.57 | -0.31 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 2.17 | 3.90 | -1.73 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 6.23 | 15.52 | -9.28 |
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month. | |||
Loading charts...
Sharpe Ratios by Period
| IBTJ | VGSH | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe Ratio (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 1.44 | 2.68 | -1.24 |
Sharpe Ratio (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.01 | 0.93 | -0.92 |
Sharpe Ratio (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | — | 1.11 | — |
Sharpe Ratio (All Time)Calculated using the full available price history | -0.02 | 1.01 | -1.03 |
Drawdowns
IBTJ vs. VGSH - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum IBTJ drawdown since its inception was -20.19%, which is greater than VGSH's maximum drawdown of -5.70%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for IBTJ and VGSH.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| IBTJ | VGSH | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -20.19% | -5.70% | -14.49% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -1.62% | -0.88% | -0.74% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -4.47% | -0.97% | -3.50% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -17.21% | -5.66% | -11.55% |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | — | -5.70% | — |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -6.30% | -0.29% | -6.01% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -9.73% | -0.60% | -9.13% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 0.56% | 0.22% | +0.34% |
Volatility
IBTJ vs. VGSH - Volatility Comparison
iShares iBonds Dec 2029 Term Treasury ETF (IBTJ) has a higher volatility of 0.64% compared to Vanguard Short-Term Treasury ETF (VGSH) at 0.35%. This indicates that IBTJ's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than VGSH based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| IBTJ | VGSH | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 0.64% | 0.35% | +0.29% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 1.56% | 0.88% | +0.68% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 2.43% | 1.29% | +1.14% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 5.74% | 1.97% | +3.77% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 5.99% | 1.57% | +4.42% |
IBTJ vs. VGSH - Expense Ratio Comparison
IBTJ has a 0.07% expense ratio, which is higher than VGSH's 0.03% expense ratio. However, both funds are considered low-cost compared to the broader market, where average expense ratios usually range from 0.3% to 0.9%.
Dividends
IBTJ vs. VGSH - Dividend Comparison
IBTJ's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 3.81%, less than VGSH's 3.87% yield.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
IBTJ iShares iBonds Dec 2029 Term Treasury ETF | 3.81% | 3.78% | 3.95% | 3.48% | 1.86% | 0.74% | 0.61% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
VGSH Vanguard Short-Term Treasury ETF | 3.87% | 4.00% | 4.18% | 3.31% | 1.15% | 0.66% | 1.74% | 2.28% | 1.79% | 1.10% | 0.84% | 0.69% |
Frequently Asked Questions
With a correlation of 0.94, IBTJ and VGSH move almost identically. Holding both adds very little diversification - you're essentially doubling your position in the same market segment. Choosing one is usually more capital-efficient.
IBTJ has higher volatility (0.64%) compared to VGSH (0.35%). In terms of maximum drawdown, IBTJ dropped -20.19% vs VGSH's -5.70%.
On 5-year performance, VGSH leads with 1.81% vs 0.06% for IBTJ. On fees, VGSH is cheaper at 0.03% per year. On volatility, VGSH has been the lower-risk option at 0.35%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
Over the 5-year period, VGSH has performed better with a 1.81% return vs 0.06%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.
VGSH is cheaper with a 0.03% expense ratio, compared with 0.07% for IBTJ.
VGSH has the higher dividend yield at 3.87%, compared with 3.81% for IBTJ.
IBTJ tracks ICE 2029 Maturity US Treasury Index, while VGSH tracks Bloomberg U.S. Treasury 1-3 Year Index. They also come from different issuers: iShares and Vanguard. Their fees differ too: 0.07% for IBTJ and 0.03% for VGSH.
VGSH currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (2.68 vs 1.44), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.
Find the right allocation for IBTJ and VGSH
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer