PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
IBTJ vs. TDG
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

IBTJ vs. TDG - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in iShares iBonds Dec 2029 Term Treasury ETF (IBTJ) and TransDigm Group Incorporated (TDG). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, IBTJ achieves a 0.04% return, which is significantly higher than TDG's -5.55% return.


IBTJ

1D
-0.09%
1M
0.36%
YTD
0.04%
6M
0.37%
1Y
3.40%
3Y*
3.81%
5Y*
-0.15%
10Y*

TDG

1D
-0.12%
1M
9.32%
YTD
-5.55%
6M
-2.98%
1Y
-6.75%
3Y*
22.32%
5Y*
17.95%
10Y*
22.72%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

IBTJ vs. TDG - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)202520242023202220212020
IBTJ
iShares iBonds Dec 2029 Term Treasury ETF
0.04%6.89%1.82%4.49%-12.45%-3.57%4.03%
TDG
TransDigm Group Incorporated
-5.55%12.15%32.27%66.57%1.77%2.82%12.63%

Correlation

The correlation between IBTJ and TDG is 0.13, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.13

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.08

Correlation (5Y)
Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.03

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Feb 28, 2020

-0.03

The correlation between IBTJ and TDG shifts across timeframes, from -0.03 (all time) to 0.13 (1 year), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

IBTJ vs. TDG — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

IBTJ
IBTJ Risk / Return Rank: 4545
Overall Rank
IBTJ Sharpe Ratio Rank: 4545
Sharpe Ratio Rank
IBTJ Sortino Ratio Rank: 5050
Sortino Ratio Rank
IBTJ Omega Ratio Rank: 4444
Omega Ratio Rank
IBTJ Calmar Ratio Rank: 4646
Calmar Ratio Rank
IBTJ Martin Ratio Rank: 3939
Martin Ratio Rank

TDG
TDG Risk / Return Rank: 3232
Overall Rank
TDG Sharpe Ratio Rank: 3333
Sharpe Ratio Rank
TDG Sortino Ratio Rank: 2929
Sortino Ratio Rank
TDG Omega Ratio Rank: 2929
Omega Ratio Rank
TDG Calmar Ratio Rank: 3535
Calmar Ratio Rank
TDG Martin Ratio Rank: 3535
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

IBTJ vs. TDG - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for iShares iBonds Dec 2029 Term Treasury ETF (IBTJ) and TransDigm Group Incorporated (TDG). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.


IBTJTDGDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

+1.62

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

+2.29

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.25

0.98

+0.27

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

2.02

-0.26

+2.28

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

5.49

-0.44

+5.94

IBTJ vs. TDG - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current IBTJ Sharpe Ratio is 1.39, which is higher than the TDG Sharpe Ratio of -0.23. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of IBTJ and TDG, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Drawdowns

IBTJ vs. TDG - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum IBTJ drawdown since its inception was -20.19%, smaller than the maximum TDG drawdown of -62.64%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for IBTJ and TDG.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


IBTJTDGDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-20.19%

-62.64%

+42.45%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-1.62%

-25.30%

+23.68%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-4.43%

-25.30%

+20.87%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-17.21%

-25.30%

+8.09%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-62.64%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-6.17%

-17.18%

+11.01%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-9.71%

-7.95%

-1.76%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

0.59%

14.75%

-14.16%

Volatility

IBTJ vs. TDG - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for iShares iBonds Dec 2029 Term Treasury ETF (IBTJ) is 0.69%, while TransDigm Group Incorporated (TDG) has a volatility of 9.84%. This indicates that IBTJ experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than TDG based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


IBTJTDGDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

0.69%

9.84%

-9.15%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

1.58%

21.88%

-20.30%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

2.36%

28.32%

-25.96%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

5.73%

27.96%

-22.23%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

5.98%

33.83%

-27.85%

Dividends

IBTJ vs. TDG - Dividend Comparison

IBTJ's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 3.80%, less than TDG's 7.17% yield.


PositionTTM2025202420232022202120202019201820172016
IBTJ
iShares iBonds Dec 2029 Term Treasury ETF
3.80%3.78%3.95%3.48%1.86%0.74%0.61%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%
TDG
TransDigm Group Incorporated
7.17%6.77%5.92%3.46%2.94%0.00%0.00%11.16%0.00%8.01%9.64%

Frequently Asked Questions


IBTJ and TDG have a correlation of 0.13, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

TDG has higher volatility (9.84%) compared to IBTJ (0.69%). In terms of maximum drawdown, IBTJ dropped -20.19% vs TDG's -62.64%.

IBTJ currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (1.39 vs -0.23), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for IBTJ and TDG

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer