PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
IBTJ vs. SPTB
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

IBTJ vs. SPTB - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in iShares iBonds Dec 2029 Term Treasury ETF (IBTJ) and State Street SPDR Portfolio Treasury ETF (SPTB). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, IBTJ achieves a 0.18% return, which is significantly lower than SPTB's 0.68% return.


IBTJ

1D
0.05%
1M
0.27%
YTD
0.18%
6M
0.31%
1Y
2.81%
3Y*
3.67%
5Y*
0.01%
10Y*

SPTB

1D
0.02%
1M
0.87%
YTD
0.68%
6M
0.54%
1Y
3.35%
3Y*
5Y*
10Y*
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

IBTJ vs. SPTB - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)20252024
IBTJ
iShares iBonds Dec 2029 Term Treasury ETF
0.18%6.89%3.07%
SPTB
State Street SPDR Portfolio Treasury ETF
0.68%6.14%2.17%

Correlation

The correlation between IBTJ and SPTB is 0.90, indicating a strong positive relationship between their price movements. Combining them offers limited diversification - they tend to fall together during downturns.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.90

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since May 21, 2024

0.92

The correlation between IBTJ and SPTB has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.90 to 0.92 - a consistent structural relationship.

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

IBTJ vs. SPTB — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

IBTJ
IBTJ Risk / Return Rank: 3636
Overall Rank
IBTJ Sharpe Ratio Rank: 3636
Sharpe Ratio Rank
IBTJ Sortino Ratio Rank: 3838
Sortino Ratio Rank
IBTJ Omega Ratio Rank: 3434
Omega Ratio Rank
IBTJ Calmar Ratio Rank: 3838
Calmar Ratio Rank
IBTJ Martin Ratio Rank: 3333
Martin Ratio Rank

SPTB
SPTB Risk / Return Rank: 2626
Overall Rank
SPTB Sharpe Ratio Rank: 2828
Sharpe Ratio Rank
SPTB Sortino Ratio Rank: 2828
Sortino Ratio Rank
SPTB Omega Ratio Rank: 2525
Omega Ratio Rank
SPTB Calmar Ratio Rank: 2626
Calmar Ratio Rank
SPTB Martin Ratio Rank: 2525
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

IBTJ vs. SPTB - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for iShares iBonds Dec 2029 Term Treasury ETF (IBTJ) and State Street SPDR Portfolio Treasury ETF (SPTB). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.


IBTJSPTBDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

+0.24

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

+0.38

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.21

1.16

+0.05

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

1.74

1.16

+0.58

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

4.49

3.16

+1.33

IBTJ vs. SPTB - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current IBTJ Sharpe Ratio is 1.18, which is comparable to the SPTB Sharpe Ratio of 0.94. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of IBTJ and SPTB, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Drawdowns

IBTJ vs. SPTB - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum IBTJ drawdown since its inception was -20.19%, which is greater than SPTB's maximum drawdown of -4.96%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for IBTJ and SPTB.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


IBTJSPTBDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-20.19%

-4.96%

-15.23%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-1.62%

-2.90%

+1.28%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-4.43%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-17.21%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-6.04%

-1.21%

-4.83%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-9.69%

-1.33%

-8.36%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

0.63%

1.06%

-0.43%

Volatility

IBTJ vs. SPTB - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for iShares iBonds Dec 2029 Term Treasury ETF (IBTJ) is 0.73%, while State Street SPDR Portfolio Treasury ETF (SPTB) has a volatility of 1.03%. This indicates that IBTJ experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than SPTB based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


IBTJSPTBDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

0.73%

1.03%

-0.30%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

1.65%

2.58%

-0.93%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

2.39%

3.57%

-1.18%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

5.72%

4.40%

+1.32%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

5.97%

4.40%

+1.57%

IBTJ vs. SPTB - Expense Ratio Comparison

IBTJ has a 0.07% expense ratio, which is higher than SPTB's 0.03% expense ratio. However, both funds are considered low-cost compared to the broader market, where average expense ratios usually range from 0.3% to 0.9%.


Dividends

IBTJ vs. SPTB - Dividend Comparison

IBTJ's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 3.80%, less than SPTB's 4.17% yield.


PositionTTM202520242023202220212020
IBTJ
iShares iBonds Dec 2029 Term Treasury ETF
3.80%3.78%3.95%3.48%1.86%0.74%0.61%
SPTB
State Street SPDR Portfolio Treasury ETF
4.17%4.23%2.76%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%

Frequently Asked Questions


With a correlation of 0.90, IBTJ and SPTB move almost identically. Holding both adds very little diversification - you're essentially doubling your position in the same market segment. Choosing one is usually more capital-efficient.

SPTB has higher volatility (1.03%) compared to IBTJ (0.73%). In terms of maximum drawdown, IBTJ dropped -20.19% vs SPTB's -4.96%.

On 1-year performance, SPTB leads with 3.35% vs 2.81% for IBTJ. On fees, SPTB is cheaper at 0.03% per year. On volatility, IBTJ has been the lower-risk option at 0.73%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Over the 1-year period, SPTB has performed better with a 3.35% return vs 2.81%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.

SPTB is cheaper with a 0.03% expense ratio, compared with 0.07% for IBTJ.

SPTB has the higher dividend yield at 4.17%, compared with 3.80% for IBTJ.

IBTJ tracks ICE 2029 Maturity US Treasury Index, while SPTB tracks Bloomberg U.S. Treasury Index. They also come from different issuers: iShares and State Street. Their fees differ too: 0.07% for IBTJ and 0.03% for SPTB.

IBTJ currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (1.18 vs 0.94), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for IBTJ and SPTB

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer