IBTJ vs. BSX
IBTJ (iShares iBonds Dec 2029 Term Treasury ETF) is Government Bonds fund tracking the ICE 2029 Maturity US Treasury Index, while BSX (Boston Scientific Corporation) is a stock. Over the past 5 years, IBTJ returned -0.15%/yr vs 1.80%/yr for BSX. At a correlation of -0.01, they often move in opposite directions.
Performance
IBTJ vs. BSX - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, IBTJ achieves a 0.04% return, which is significantly higher than BSX's -50.80% return.
IBTJ
- 1D
- -0.09%
- 1M
- 0.36%
- YTD
- 0.04%
- 6M
- 0.37%
- 1Y
- 3.40%
- 3Y*
- 3.81%
- 5Y*
- -0.15%
- 10Y*
- —
BSX
- 1D
- -0.55%
- 1M
- -10.95%
- YTD
- -50.80%
- 6M
- -49.33%
- 1Y
- -52.97%
- 3Y*
- -2.85%
- 5Y*
- 1.80%
- 10Y*
- 7.42%
IBTJ vs. BSX - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
IBTJ iShares iBonds Dec 2029 Term Treasury ETF | 0.04% | 6.89% | 1.82% | 4.49% | -12.45% | -3.57% | 4.03% |
BSX Boston Scientific Corporation | -50.80% | 6.75% | 54.51% | 24.94% | 8.92% | 18.16% | -5.20% |
Correlation
The correlation between IBTJ and BSX is 0.14, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.14 |
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period | 0.08 |
Correlation (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.07 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Feb 28, 2020 | -0.01 |
The correlation between IBTJ and BSX shifts across timeframes, from -0.01 (all time) to 0.14 (1 year), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
IBTJ vs. BSX — Risk / Return Rank
IBTJ
BSX
IBTJ vs. BSX - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for iShares iBonds Dec 2029 Term Treasury ETF (IBTJ) and Boston Scientific Corporation (BSX). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.
| IBTJ | BSX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | +2.90 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | +4.44 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.25 | 0.67 | +0.58 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 2.02 | -0.93 | +2.95 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 5.49 | -2.00 | +7.49 |
Loading charts...
Drawdowns
IBTJ vs. BSX - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum IBTJ drawdown since its inception was -20.19%, smaller than the maximum BSX drawdown of -89.15%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for IBTJ and BSX.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| IBTJ | BSX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -20.19% | -89.15% | +68.96% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -1.62% | -56.62% | +55.00% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -4.43% | -56.62% | +52.19% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -17.21% | -56.62% | +39.41% |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | — | -56.62% | — |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -6.17% | -56.62% | +50.45% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -9.71% | -38.76% | +29.05% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 0.59% | 26.23% | -25.64% |
Volatility
IBTJ vs. BSX - Volatility Comparison
The current volatility for iShares iBonds Dec 2029 Term Treasury ETF (IBTJ) is 0.69%, while Boston Scientific Corporation (BSX) has a volatility of 15.84%. This indicates that IBTJ experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than BSX based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| IBTJ | BSX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 0.69% | 15.84% | -15.15% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 1.58% | 32.83% | -31.25% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 2.36% | 34.77% | -32.41% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 5.73% | 25.69% | -19.96% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 5.98% | 27.29% | -21.31% |
Dividends
IBTJ vs. BSX - Dividend Comparison
IBTJ's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 3.80%, while BSX has not paid dividends to shareholders.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
BSX Boston Scientific Corporation | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
IBTJ iShares iBonds Dec 2029 Term Treasury ETF | 3.80% | 3.78% | 3.95% | 3.48% | 1.86% | 0.74% | 0.61% |
Frequently Asked Questions
IBTJ and BSX have a correlation of 0.14, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
BSX has higher volatility (15.84%) compared to IBTJ (0.69%). In terms of maximum drawdown, IBTJ dropped -20.19% vs BSX's -89.15%.
IBTJ currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (1.39 vs -1.51), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.
Find the right allocation for IBTJ and BSX
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer