IBTI vs. MUU
IBTI (iShares iBonds Dec 2028 Term Treasury ETF) and MUU (Direxion Daily MU Bull 2X Shares) are both exchange-traded funds - IBTI is a Government Bonds fund tracking the ICE 2028 Maturity US Treasury Index, while MUU is a Leveraged Equities fund tracking the Micron Technology, Inc. (200% Daily). Both are passively managed. At a correlation of -0.09, they often move in opposite directions. IBTI charges 0.07%/yr vs 1.01%/yr for MUU.
Performance
IBTI vs. MUU - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
IBTI
- 1D
- 0.14%
- 1M
- 0.32%
- YTD
- 0.45%
- 6M
- 0.58%
- 1Y
- 3.03%
- 3Y*
- 3.91%
- 5Y*
- 0.25%
- 10Y*
- —
MUU
- 1D
- -0.64%
- 1M
- —
- YTD
- —
- 6M
- —
- 1Y
- —
- 3Y*
- —
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
IBTI vs. MUU - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | |
|---|---|
IBTI iShares iBonds Dec 2028 Term Treasury ETF | -0.05% |
MUU Direxion Daily MU Bull 2X Shares | -12.53% |
Correlation
The correlation between IBTI and MUU is -0.09, meaning there is essentially no relationship between their price movements. Each responds to its own set of market drivers, making them strong candidates for combining in a diversified portfolio.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Jun 16, 2026 | -0.09 |
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
IBTI vs. MUU — Risk / Return Rank
IBTI
MUU
Risk / return metrics aren't available yet — we need at least 12 months of trading data to calculate them.
IBTI vs. MUU - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for iShares iBonds Dec 2028 Term Treasury ETF (IBTI) and Direxion Daily MU Bull 2X Shares (MUU). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.
| IBTI | MUU | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | — | — | |
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | — | — | |
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.36 | — | — |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 2.77 | — | — |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 8.88 | — | — |
Loading charts...
Drawdowns
IBTI vs. MUU - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum IBTI drawdown since its inception was -18.45%, smaller than the maximum MUU drawdown of -26.63%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for IBTI and MUU.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| IBTI | MUU | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -18.45% | -26.63% | +8.18% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -1.10% | — | — |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -3.24% | — | — |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -16.18% | — | — |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -3.78% | -26.63% | +22.85% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -8.21% | -12.91% | +4.70% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 0.34% | — | — |
Volatility
IBTI vs. MUU - Volatility Comparison
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| IBTI | MUU | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 0.49% | — | — |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 1.11% | — | — |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 1.69% | 263.57% | -261.88% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 5.00% | 263.57% | -258.57% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 5.15% | 263.57% | -258.42% |
IBTI vs. MUU - Expense Ratio Comparison
IBTI has a 0.07% expense ratio, which is lower than MUU's 1.01% expense ratio.
Dividends
IBTI vs. MUU - Dividend Comparison
IBTI's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 3.80%, more than MUU's 0.23% yield.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
IBTI iShares iBonds Dec 2028 Term Treasury ETF | 3.80% | 3.87% | 3.92% | 3.27% | 1.70% | 0.90% | 0.56% |
MUU Direxion Daily MU Bull 2X Shares | 0.23% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
Frequently Asked Questions
IBTI and MUU have a correlation of -0.09, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
On fees, IBTI is cheaper at 0.07% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
IBTI is cheaper with a 0.07% expense ratio, compared with 1.01% for MUU.
IBTI has the higher dividend yield at 3.80%, compared with 0.23% for MUU.
IBTI is categorized as Government Bonds, while MUU is Leveraged Equities. IBTI tracks ICE 2028 Maturity US Treasury Index, while MUU tracks Micron Technology, Inc. (200% Daily). They also come from different issuers: iShares and Direxion. Their fees differ too: 0.07% for IBTI and 1.01% for MUU.
Find the right allocation for IBTI and MUU
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer