PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
IBTI vs. MUU
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

IBTI vs. MUU - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in iShares iBonds Dec 2028 Term Treasury ETF (IBTI) and Direxion Daily MU Bull 2X Shares (MUU). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, IBTI achieves a 0.82% return, which is significantly lower than MUU's 450.36% return.


IBTI

1D
0.16%
1M
0.22%
6M
0.72%
YTD
0.82%
1Y
2.67%
3Y*
4.13%
5Y*
-0.06%
10Y*
ALL TIME*
0.33%

MUU

1D
14.92%
1M
-26.01%
6M
169.13%
YTD
450.36%
1Y
3,107.14%
3Y*
5Y*
10Y*
ALL TIME*
458.96%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

Liquidity Comparison


PositionAvg. Volume Value (2W)Avg. Volume Value (1M)Avg. Volume Value (3M)
$9.92M$10.63M$9.25M
$1.48B$1.48B$2.29B

IBTI vs. MUU - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)20252024
IBTI
iShares iBonds Dec 2028 Term Treasury ETF
0.82%6.15%-0.32%
MUU
Direxion Daily MU Bull 2X Shares
450.36%599.03%-40.91%

Correlation

The correlation between IBTI and MUU is -0.05, meaning there was essentially no consistent relationship between their historical price movements. Each responded to its own set of market drivers.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Focuses on recent behavior, but can change the most.

-0.05

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Oct 10, 2024

-0.10

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

IBTI vs. MUU — Risk / Return Rank

Compare historical risk-adjusted metric ranks over the past 12 months.

IBTI
IBTI Risk / Return Rank: 6666
Overall Rank
IBTI Sharpe Ratio Rank: 6767
Sharpe Ratio Rank
IBTI Sortino Ratio Rank: 7373
Sortino Ratio Rank
IBTI Omega Ratio Rank: 6969
Omega Ratio Rank
IBTI Calmar Ratio Rank: 6161
Calmar Ratio Rank
IBTI Martin Ratio Rank: 5858
Martin Ratio Rank

MUU
MUU Risk / Return Rank: 9898
Overall Rank
MUU Sharpe Ratio Rank: 100100
Sharpe Ratio Rank
MUU Sortino Ratio Rank: 9797
Sortino Ratio Rank
MUU Omega Ratio Rank: 9696
Omega Ratio Rank
MUU Calmar Ratio Rank: 9999
Calmar Ratio Rank
MUU Martin Ratio Rank: 9999
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) uses a weighted average of the Sharpe, Sortino, Omega, Calmar, and Martin percentile ranks for the trailing 12 months. Higher means stronger historical risk-adjusted performance within the peer group.

IBTI vs. MUU - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for iShares iBonds Dec 2028 Term Treasury ETF (IBTI) and Direxion Daily MU Bull 2X Shares (MUU). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.


IBTIMUUDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

-17.74

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

-2.43

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.33

1.64

-0.31

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

2.44

46.30

-43.86

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

7.70

149.20

-141.50

IBTI vs. MUU - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current IBTI Sharpe Ratio is 1.76, which is lower than the MUU Sharpe Ratio of 19.49. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of IBTI and MUU, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Drawdowns

IBTI vs. MUU - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum IBTI drawdown since its inception was -18.45%, smaller than the maximum MUU drawdown of -75.07%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for IBTI and MUU.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


IBTIMUUDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-18.45%

-75.07%

+56.62%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-1.10%

-68.07%

+66.97%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-2.81%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-15.72%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-3.42%

-55.16%

+51.74%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-8.13%

-24.49%

+16.36%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

0.35%

21.08%

-20.73%

Volatility

IBTI vs. MUU - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for iShares iBonds Dec 2028 Term Treasury ETF (IBTI) is 0.39%, while Direxion Daily MU Bull 2X Shares (MUU) has a volatility of 63.27%. This indicates that IBTI experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than MUU based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


IBTIMUUDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

0.39%

63.27%

-62.88%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

1.15%

134.06%

-132.91%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

1.52%

161.74%

-160.22%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

4.97%

146.75%

-141.78%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

5.11%

146.75%

-141.64%

IBTI vs. MUU - Expense Ratio Comparison

IBTI has a 0.07% expense ratio, which is lower than MUU's 1.01% expense ratio.


Dividends

IBTI vs. MUU - Dividend Comparison

IBTI's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 3.77%, more than MUU's 1.23% yield.


PositionTTM202520242023202220212020
IBTI
iShares iBonds Dec 2028 Term Treasury ETF
3.77%3.87%3.92%3.27%1.70%0.90%0.56%
MUU
Direxion Daily MU Bull 2X Shares
1.23%4.27%0.31%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%

Frequently Asked Questions


IBTI and MUU have a correlation of -0.05, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

MUU has higher volatility (63.27%) compared to IBTI (0.39%). In terms of maximum drawdown, IBTI dropped -18.45% vs MUU's -75.07%.

On 1-year performance, MUU leads with 3107.14% vs 2.67% for IBTI. On fees, IBTI is cheaper at 0.07% per year. On volatility, IBTI has been the lower-risk option at 0.39%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Over the 1-year period, MUU has performed better with a 3107.14% return vs 2.67%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.

IBTI is cheaper with a 0.07% expense ratio, compared with 1.01% for MUU.

IBTI has the higher dividend yield at 3.77%, compared with 1.23% for MUU.

IBTI is categorized as Government Bonds, while MUU is Leveraged Equities. IBTI tracks ICE 2028 Maturity US Treasury Index, while MUU tracks Micron Technology, Inc. (200% Daily). They also come from different issuers: iShares and Direxion. Their fees differ too: 0.07% for IBTI and 1.01% for MUU.

MUU currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (19.49 vs 1.76), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for IBTI and MUU

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer