PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
IBTG.L vs. VDTA.L
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

IBTG.L vs. VDTA.L - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a £10,000 investment in iShares $ Treasury Bond 1-3yr UCITS ETF GBP Hedged (Dist) (IBTG.L) and Vanguard USD Treasury Bond UCITS ETF Accumulating (VDTA.L). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Different Trading Currencies

IBTG.L is traded in GBP, while VDTA.L is traded in USD. To make them comparable, the VDTA.L values have been converted to GBP using the latest available exchange rates.

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, IBTG.L achieves a 0.68% return, which is significantly higher than VDTA.L's -0.74% return.


IBTG.L

1D
0.08%
1M
0.08%
6M
0.68%
YTD
0.68%
1Y
3.11%
3Y*
4.05%
5Y*
1.54%
10Y*

VDTA.L

1D
-0.89%
1M
-1.06%
6M
-0.97%
YTD
-0.74%
1Y
2.41%
3Y*
1.76%
5Y*
-0.36%
10Y*
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

IBTG.L vs. VDTA.L - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)2025202420232022202120202019
IBTG.L
iShares $ Treasury Bond 1-3yr UCITS ETF GBP Hedged (Dist)
0.68%5.08%3.75%3.65%-4.56%-0.82%2.70%1.75%
VDTA.L
Vanguard USD Treasury Bond UCITS ETF Accumulating
-0.74%-1.33%2.71%-1.47%-1.95%-1.41%4.48%4.79%

Correlation

The correlation between IBTG.L and VDTA.L is 0.13, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.13

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.20

Correlation (5Y)
Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.19

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Feb 19, 2019

0.18

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

IBTG.L vs. VDTA.L — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

IBTG.L
IBTG.L Risk / Return Rank: 8484
Overall Rank
IBTG.L Sharpe Ratio Rank: 6969
Sharpe Ratio Rank
IBTG.L Sortino Ratio Rank: 8080
Sortino Ratio Rank
IBTG.L Omega Ratio Rank: 9494
Omega Ratio Rank
IBTG.L Calmar Ratio Rank: 9191
Calmar Ratio Rank
IBTG.L Martin Ratio Rank: 8787
Martin Ratio Rank

VDTA.L
VDTA.L Risk / Return Rank: 3030
Overall Rank
VDTA.L Sharpe Ratio Rank: 3333
Sharpe Ratio Rank
VDTA.L Sortino Ratio Rank: 3232
Sortino Ratio Rank
VDTA.L Omega Ratio Rank: 3030
Omega Ratio Rank
VDTA.L Calmar Ratio Rank: 2929
Calmar Ratio Rank
VDTA.L Martin Ratio Rank: 2828
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

IBTG.L vs. VDTA.L - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for iShares $ Treasury Bond 1-3yr UCITS ETF GBP Hedged (Dist) (IBTG.L) and Vanguard USD Treasury Bond UCITS ETF Accumulating (VDTA.L). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.


IBTG.LVDTA.LDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

+1.43

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

+2.30

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.57

1.07

+0.51

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

4.62

0.41

+4.21

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

14.41

0.98

+13.43

IBTG.L vs. VDTA.L - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current IBTG.L Sharpe Ratio is 1.79, which is higher than the VDTA.L Sharpe Ratio of 0.36. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of IBTG.L and VDTA.L, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Drawdowns

IBTG.L vs. VDTA.L - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum IBTG.L drawdown since its inception was -6.15%, smaller than the maximum VDTA.L drawdown of -22.98%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for IBTG.L and VDTA.L.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


IBTG.LVDTA.LDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-6.15%

-22.98%

+16.83%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-0.67%

-5.84%

+5.17%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-0.85%

-8.53%

+7.68%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-6.13%

-16.77%

+10.64%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

0.00%

-18.62%

+18.62%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-1.25%

-14.97%

+13.72%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

0.22%

2.46%

-2.24%

Volatility

IBTG.L vs. VDTA.L - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for iShares $ Treasury Bond 1-3yr UCITS ETF GBP Hedged (Dist) (IBTG.L) is 0.45%, while Vanguard USD Treasury Bond UCITS ETF Accumulating (VDTA.L) has a volatility of 2.24%. This indicates that IBTG.L experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than VDTA.L based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


IBTG.LVDTA.LDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

0.45%

2.24%

-1.79%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

1.14%

5.23%

-4.09%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

1.73%

6.65%

-4.92%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

2.43%

8.99%

-6.56%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

2.07%

9.41%

-7.34%

IBTG.L vs. VDTA.L - Expense Ratio Comparison

IBTG.L has a 0.10% expense ratio, which is higher than VDTA.L's 0.05% expense ratio. However, both funds are considered low-cost compared to the broader market, where average expense ratios usually range from 0.3% to 0.9%.


Dividends

IBTG.L vs. VDTA.L - Dividend Comparison

IBTG.L's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 3.87%, while VDTA.L has not paid dividends to shareholders.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018
IBTG.L
iShares $ Treasury Bond 1-3yr UCITS ETF GBP Hedged (Dist)
3.87%4.08%4.12%2.92%0.76%0.59%1.66%2.35%0.78%
VDTA.L
Vanguard USD Treasury Bond UCITS ETF Accumulating
0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%

Frequently Asked Questions


IBTG.L and VDTA.L have a correlation of 0.13, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

On fees, VDTA.L is cheaper at 0.05% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

VDTA.L is cheaper with a 0.05% expense ratio, compared with 0.10% for IBTG.L.

IBTG.L tracks iShares $ Treasury Bond 1-3yr UCITS ETF GBP Hedged (Dist), while VDTA.L tracks Bloomberg Global Aggregate US Treasury Float Adjusted index. They also come from different issuers: iShares and Vanguard. Their fees differ too: 0.10% for IBTG.L and 0.05% for VDTA.L.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for IBTG.L and VDTA.L

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer