PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
IBTF vs. SMBS
Performance
Return for Risk
Dividends
Drawdowns
Volatility

Performance

IBTF vs. SMBS - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in iShares iBonds Dec 2025 Term Treasury ETF (IBTF) and Schwab Mortgage-Backed Securities ETF (SMBS). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading graphics...

IBTF vs. SMBS - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)20252024
IBTF
iShares iBonds Dec 2025 Term Treasury ETF
0.00%3.81%0.71%
SMBS
Schwab Mortgage-Backed Securities ETF
0.36%8.15%-0.07%

Returns By Period


IBTF

1D
0.00%
1M
0.00%
YTD
0.00%
6M
0.73%
1Y
2.88%
3Y*
3.59%
5Y*
1.00%
10Y*

SMBS

1D
0.20%
1M
-1.67%
YTD
0.36%
6M
1.92%
1Y
5.33%
3Y*
5Y*
10Y*
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


IBTF vs. SMBS - Expense Ratio Comparison

IBTF has a 0.07% expense ratio, which is higher than SMBS's 0.03% expense ratio. However, both funds are considered low-cost compared to the broader market, where average expense ratios usually range from 0.3% to 0.9%.


Return for Risk

IBTF vs. SMBS — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

IBTF
IBTF Risk / Return Rank: 9999
Overall Rank
IBTF Sharpe Ratio Rank: 9999
Sharpe Ratio Rank
IBTF Sortino Ratio Rank: 9999
Sortino Ratio Rank
IBTF Omega Ratio Rank: 9999
Omega Ratio Rank
IBTF Calmar Ratio Rank: 100100
Calmar Ratio Rank
IBTF Martin Ratio Rank: 100100
Martin Ratio Rank

SMBS
SMBS Risk / Return Rank: 6363
Overall Rank
SMBS Sharpe Ratio Rank: 6565
Sharpe Ratio Rank
SMBS Sortino Ratio Rank: 6464
Sortino Ratio Rank
SMBS Omega Ratio Rank: 5555
Omega Ratio Rank
SMBS Calmar Ratio Rank: 7575
Calmar Ratio Rank
SMBS Martin Ratio Rank: 5858
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

IBTF vs. SMBS - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for iShares iBonds Dec 2025 Term Treasury ETF (IBTF) and Schwab Mortgage-Backed Securities ETF (SMBS). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


IBTFSMBSDifference

Sharpe ratio

Return per unit of total volatility

7.41

1.12

+6.29

Sortino ratio

Return per unit of downside risk

17.29

1.61

+15.68

Omega ratio

Gain probability vs. loss probability

4.32

1.20

+3.12

Calmar ratio

Return relative to maximum drawdown

82.67

1.94

+80.72

Martin ratio

Return relative to average drawdown

244.42

5.61

+238.82

IBTF vs. SMBS - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current IBTF Sharpe Ratio is 7.41, which is higher than the SMBS Sharpe Ratio of 1.12. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of IBTF and SMBS, offering insights into how both investments have performed under varying market conditions. These values are calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months.


Loading graphics...

Sharpe Ratios by Period


IBTFSMBSDifference

Sharpe Ratio (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

7.41

1.12

+6.29

Sharpe Ratio (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.43

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

0.45

1.27

-0.82

Correlation

The correlation between IBTF and SMBS is -0.02. This indicates that the assets' prices tend to move in opposite directions. Negative correlation can be particularly beneficial for diversification and risk management, as one asset may offset the losses of the other during market fluctuations.


Dividends

IBTF vs. SMBS - Dividend Comparison

IBTF's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 3.14%, less than SMBS's 4.80% yield.


TTM202520242023202220212020
IBTF
iShares iBonds Dec 2025 Term Treasury ETF
3.14%3.83%4.32%4.03%1.93%0.57%0.59%
SMBS
Schwab Mortgage-Backed Securities ETF
4.80%4.83%0.50%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%

Drawdowns

IBTF vs. SMBS - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum IBTF drawdown since its inception was -10.45%, which is greater than SMBS's maximum drawdown of -3.20%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for IBTF and SMBS.


Loading graphics...

Drawdown Indicators


IBTFSMBSDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-10.45%

-3.20%

-7.25%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-0.04%

-2.83%

+2.79%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-9.53%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

0.00%

-1.67%

+1.67%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-3.42%

-0.77%

-2.65%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

0.01%

0.98%

-0.97%

Volatility

IBTF vs. SMBS - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for iShares iBonds Dec 2025 Term Treasury ETF (IBTF) is 0.00%, while Schwab Mortgage-Backed Securities ETF (SMBS) has a volatility of 1.82%. This indicates that IBTF experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than SMBS based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading graphics...

Volatility by Period


IBTFSMBSDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

0.00%

1.82%

-1.82%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

0.25%

2.75%

-2.50%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.46%

4.77%

-4.31%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

2.39%

4.92%

-2.53%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

2.60%

4.92%

-2.32%