IBTF vs. SCHO
IBTF (iShares iBonds Dec 2025 Term Treasury ETF) and SCHO (Schwab Short-Term U.S. Treasury ETF) are both Government Bonds funds - IBTF tracks the ICE 2025 Maturity US Treasury Index while SCHO tracks the Bloomberg U.S. Treasury 1-3 Year Index. Both are passively managed. Over the past 5 years, IBTF returned 0.90%/yr vs 1.80%/yr for SCHO. A 0.64 correlation means they provide meaningful diversification when combined. IBTF charges 0.07%/yr vs 0.03%/yr for SCHO.
Performance
IBTF vs. SCHO - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
IBTF
- 1D
- 0.00%
- 1M
- 0.00%
- YTD
- 0.00%
- 6M
- 0.09%
- 1Y
- 2.14%
- 3Y*
- 3.66%
- 5Y*
- 0.90%
- 10Y*
- —
SCHO
- 1D
- -0.04%
- 1M
- 0.06%
- YTD
- 0.42%
- 6M
- 0.78%
- 1Y
- 3.39%
- 3Y*
- 4.15%
- 5Y*
- 1.80%
- 10Y*
- 1.71%
IBTF vs. SCHO - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
IBTF iShares iBonds Dec 2025 Term Treasury ETF | 0.00% | 3.81% | 4.60% | 4.12% | -6.39% | -2.31% | 3.60% |
SCHO Schwab Short-Term U.S. Treasury ETF | 0.42% | 5.49% | 3.65% | 4.31% | -3.87% | -0.64% | 1.62% |
Correlation
The correlation between IBTF and SCHO is -0.05, meaning there is essentially no relationship between their price movements. Each responds to its own set of market drivers, making them strong candidates for combining in a diversified portfolio.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | -0.05 |
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period | 0.49 |
Correlation (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.69 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Mar 2, 2020 | 0.64 |
The correlation between IBTF and SCHO shifts across timeframes, from -0.05 (1 year) to 0.69 (5 years), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
IBTF vs. SCHO — Risk / Return Rank
IBTF
SCHO
IBTF vs. SCHO - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for iShares iBonds Dec 2025 Term Treasury ETF (IBTF) and Schwab Short-Term U.S. Treasury ETF (SCHO). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
| IBTF | SCHO | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | +4.59 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | +16.01 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 6.23 | 1.50 | +4.73 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 59.41 | 3.96 | +55.44 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 269.70 | 17.03 | +252.67 |
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month. | |||
Loading charts...
Sharpe Ratios by Period
| IBTF | SCHO | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe Ratio (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 7.08 | 2.48 | +4.59 |
Sharpe Ratio (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.39 | 0.91 | -0.52 |
Sharpe Ratio (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | — | 1.10 | — |
Sharpe Ratio (All Time)Calculated using the full available price history | 0.44 | 0.99 | -0.55 |
Drawdowns
IBTF vs. SCHO - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum IBTF drawdown since its inception was -10.45%, which is greater than SCHO's maximum drawdown of -5.69%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for IBTF and SCHO.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| IBTF | SCHO | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -10.45% | -5.69% | -4.76% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -0.04% | -0.86% | +0.82% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -0.67% | -0.98% | +0.31% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -9.53% | -5.69% | -3.84% |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | — | -5.69% | — |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | 0.00% | -0.27% | +0.27% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -3.33% | -0.61% | -2.72% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 0.01% | 0.20% | -0.19% |
Volatility
IBTF vs. SCHO - Volatility Comparison
The current volatility for iShares iBonds Dec 2025 Term Treasury ETF (IBTF) is 0.00%, while Schwab Short-Term U.S. Treasury ETF (SCHO) has a volatility of 0.41%. This indicates that IBTF experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than SCHO based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| IBTF | SCHO | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 0.00% | 0.41% | -0.41% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 0.19% | 0.90% | -0.71% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.36% | 1.37% | -1.01% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 2.38% | 1.98% | +0.40% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 2.56% | 1.56% | +1.00% |
IBTF vs. SCHO - Expense Ratio Comparison
IBTF has a 0.07% expense ratio, which is higher than SCHO's 0.03% expense ratio. However, both funds are considered low-cost compared to the broader market, where average expense ratios usually range from 0.3% to 0.9%.
Dividends
IBTF vs. SCHO - Dividend Comparison
IBTF's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 2.08%, less than SCHO's 3.91% yield.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
IBTF iShares iBonds Dec 2025 Term Treasury ETF | 2.08% | 3.83% | 4.32% | 4.03% | 1.93% | 0.57% | 0.59% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
SCHO Schwab Short-Term U.S. Treasury ETF | 3.91% | 4.06% | 4.29% | 3.76% | 1.34% | 0.41% | 1.27% | 2.27% | 1.60% | 1.12% | 0.82% | 0.68% |
Frequently Asked Questions
IBTF and SCHO have a correlation of -0.05, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
SCHO has higher volatility (0.41%) compared to IBTF (0.00%). In terms of maximum drawdown, IBTF dropped -10.45% vs SCHO's -5.69%.
On 5-year performance, SCHO leads with 1.80% vs 0.90% for IBTF. On fees, SCHO is cheaper at 0.03% per year. On volatility, IBTF has been the lower-risk option at 0.00%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
Over the 5-year period, SCHO has performed better with a 1.80% return vs 0.90%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.
SCHO is cheaper with a 0.03% expense ratio, compared with 0.07% for IBTF.
SCHO has the higher dividend yield at 3.91%, compared with 2.08% for IBTF.
IBTF tracks ICE 2025 Maturity US Treasury Index, while SCHO tracks Bloomberg U.S. Treasury 1-3 Year Index. They also come from different issuers: iShares and Charles Schwab. Their fees differ too: 0.07% for IBTF and 0.03% for SCHO.
IBTF currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (7.08 vs 2.48), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.
Find the right allocation for IBTF and SCHO
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer