PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
IBRN vs. SBIT
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

IBRN vs. SBIT - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in iShares Neuroscience and Healthcare ETF (IBRN) and Proshares Ultrashort Bitcoin ETF (SBIT). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, IBRN achieves a 18.23% return, which is significantly lower than SBIT's 44.00% return.


IBRN

1D
-2.16%
1M
9.69%
6M
19.74%
YTD
18.23%
1Y
69.86%
3Y*
16.48%
5Y*
10Y*

SBIT

1D
5.38%
1M
1.44%
6M
58.27%
YTD
44.00%
1Y
124.12%
3Y*
5Y*
10Y*
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

IBRN vs. SBIT - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)20252024
IBRN
iShares Neuroscience and Healthcare ETF
18.23%28.49%0.52%
SBIT
Proshares Ultrashort Bitcoin ETF
44.00%-25.11%-73.74%

Correlation

The correlation between IBRN and SBIT is -0.33, meaning they tend to move in opposite directions. This is especially valuable for risk management - when one declines, the other has historically tended to hold steady or rise.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

-0.33

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Apr 2, 2024

-0.33

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

IBRN vs. SBIT — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

IBRN
IBRN Risk / Return Rank: 9393
Overall Rank
IBRN Sharpe Ratio Rank: 9494
Sharpe Ratio Rank
IBRN Sortino Ratio Rank: 9292
Sortino Ratio Rank
IBRN Omega Ratio Rank: 8888
Omega Ratio Rank
IBRN Calmar Ratio Rank: 9797
Calmar Ratio Rank
IBRN Martin Ratio Rank: 9595
Martin Ratio Rank

SBIT
SBIT Risk / Return Rank: 5252
Overall Rank
SBIT Sharpe Ratio Rank: 5151
Sharpe Ratio Rank
SBIT Sortino Ratio Rank: 5252
Sortino Ratio Rank
SBIT Omega Ratio Rank: 4848
Omega Ratio Rank
SBIT Calmar Ratio Rank: 6666
Calmar Ratio Rank
SBIT Martin Ratio Rank: 4545
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

IBRN vs. SBIT - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for iShares Neuroscience and Healthcare ETF (IBRN) and Proshares Ultrashort Bitcoin ETF (SBIT). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.


IBRNSBITDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

+1.35

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

+1.55

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.43

1.25

+0.18

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

7.98

2.60

+5.37

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

22.47

5.92

+16.55

IBRN vs. SBIT - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current IBRN Sharpe Ratio is 2.76, which is higher than the SBIT Sharpe Ratio of 1.41. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of IBRN and SBIT, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Drawdowns

IBRN vs. SBIT - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum IBRN drawdown since its inception was -35.38%, smaller than the maximum SBIT drawdown of -91.35%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for IBRN and SBIT.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


IBRNSBITDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-35.38%

-91.35%

+55.97%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-8.80%

-47.94%

+39.14%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-35.38%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-5.16%

-77.15%

+71.99%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-9.63%

-68.83%

+59.20%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

3.12%

21.04%

-17.92%

Volatility

IBRN vs. SBIT - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for iShares Neuroscience and Healthcare ETF (IBRN) is 6.66%, while Proshares Ultrashort Bitcoin ETF (SBIT) has a volatility of 22.98%. This indicates that IBRN experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than SBIT based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


IBRNSBITDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

6.66%

22.98%

-16.32%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

19.29%

68.89%

-49.60%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

25.51%

88.51%

-63.00%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

25.34%

96.89%

-71.55%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

25.34%

96.89%

-71.55%

IBRN vs. SBIT - Expense Ratio Comparison

IBRN has a 0.47% expense ratio, which is lower than SBIT's 0.95% expense ratio.


Dividends

IBRN vs. SBIT - Dividend Comparison

IBRN's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 0.84%, less than SBIT's 3.97% yield.


PositionTTM202520242023
IBRN
iShares Neuroscience and Healthcare ETF
0.84%0.99%0.40%0.06%
SBIT
Proshares Ultrashort Bitcoin ETF
3.97%0.52%1.00%0.00%

Frequently Asked Questions


IBRN and SBIT have a correlation of -0.33, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

SBIT has higher volatility (22.98%) compared to IBRN (6.66%). In terms of maximum drawdown, IBRN dropped -35.38% vs SBIT's -91.35%.

On 1-year performance, SBIT leads with 124.12% vs 69.86% for IBRN. On fees, IBRN is cheaper at 0.47% per year. On volatility, IBRN has been the lower-risk option at 6.66%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Over the 1-year period, SBIT has performed better with a 124.12% return vs 69.86%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.

IBRN is cheaper with a 0.47% expense ratio, compared with 0.95% for SBIT.

SBIT has the higher dividend yield at 3.97%, compared with 0.84% for IBRN.

IBRN is categorized as Health & Biotech Equities, while SBIT is Cryptocurrency. IBRN tracks NYSE FactSet Global Neuro Biopharma and MedTech Index, while SBIT tracks Bloomberg Bitcoin Index (-200%). They also come from different issuers: iShares and ProShares. Their fees differ too: 0.47% for IBRN and 0.95% for SBIT.

IBRN currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (2.76 vs 1.41), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for IBRN and SBIT

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer