PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
IBRN vs. BITI
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

IBRN vs. BITI - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in iShares Neuroscience and Healthcare ETF (IBRN) and ProShares Short Bitcoin ETF (BITI). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, IBRN achieves a 13.26% return, which is significantly lower than BITI's 27.11% return.


IBRN

1D
-3.24%
1M
-6.28%
6M
12.31%
YTD
13.26%
1Y
59.23%
3Y*
14.57%
5Y*
10Y*
ALL TIME*
10.28%

BITI

1D
3.01%
1M
-2.58%
6M
22.77%
YTD
27.11%
1Y
58.64%
3Y*
-31.77%
5Y*
10Y*
ALL TIME*
-35.65%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

Liquidity Comparison


PositionAvg. Volume Value (2W)Avg. Volume Value (1M)Avg. Volume Value (3M)
$24.10M$26.49M$38.71M
$83.61K$123.63K$97.37K

IBRN vs. BITI - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)2025202420232022
IBRN
iShares Neuroscience and Healthcare ETF
13.26%28.49%-2.78%0.92%2.87%
BITI
ProShares Short Bitcoin ETF
27.11%-1.76%-62.60%-66.17%10.69%

Correlation

The correlation between IBRN and BITI is -0.32, meaning they have often moved in opposite directions in the past. This relationship can weaken or reverse as market conditions change.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Focuses on recent behavior, but can change the most.

-0.32

Correlation (3Y)
Balances recent behavior with more history.

-0.30

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Aug 26, 2022

-0.30

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

IBRN vs. BITI — Risk / Return Rank

Compare historical risk-adjusted metric ranks over the past 12 months.

IBRN
IBRN Risk / Return Rank: 9191
Overall Rank
IBRN Sharpe Ratio Rank: 9191
Sharpe Ratio Rank
IBRN Sortino Ratio Rank: 8989
Sortino Ratio Rank
IBRN Omega Ratio Rank: 8484
Omega Ratio Rank
IBRN Calmar Ratio Rank: 9696
Calmar Ratio Rank
IBRN Martin Ratio Rank: 9393
Martin Ratio Rank

BITI
BITI Risk / Return Rank: 6161
Overall Rank
BITI Sharpe Ratio Rank: 6363
Sharpe Ratio Rank
BITI Sortino Ratio Rank: 6060
Sortino Ratio Rank
BITI Omega Ratio Rank: 5555
Omega Ratio Rank
BITI Calmar Ratio Rank: 7373
Calmar Ratio Rank
BITI Martin Ratio Rank: 5353
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) uses a weighted average of the Sharpe, Sortino, Omega, Calmar, and Martin percentile ranks for the trailing 12 months. Higher means stronger historical risk-adjusted performance within the peer group.

IBRN vs. BITI - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for iShares Neuroscience and Healthcare ETF (IBRN) and ProShares Short Bitcoin ETF (BITI). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.


IBRNBITIDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

+0.84

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

+1.08

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.36

1.24

+0.12

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

6.42

2.53

+3.89

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

16.74

6.17

+10.57

IBRN vs. BITI - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current IBRN Sharpe Ratio is 2.29, which is higher than the BITI Sharpe Ratio of 1.45. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of IBRN and BITI, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Drawdowns

IBRN vs. BITI - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum IBRN drawdown since its inception was -35.38%, smaller than the maximum BITI drawdown of -92.16%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for IBRN and BITI.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


IBRNBITIDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-35.38%

-92.16%

+56.78%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-9.15%

-25.28%

+16.13%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-35.38%

-84.63%

+49.25%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-9.15%

-86.12%

+76.97%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-9.59%

-68.59%

+59.00%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

3.50%

10.35%

-6.85%

Volatility

IBRN vs. BITI - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for iShares Neuroscience and Healthcare ETF (IBRN) is 7.68%, while ProShares Short Bitcoin ETF (BITI) has a volatility of 9.13%. This indicates that IBRN experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than BITI based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


IBRNBITIDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

7.68%

9.13%

-1.45%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

19.64%

33.31%

-13.67%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

25.61%

44.23%

-18.62%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

25.34%

52.03%

-26.69%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

25.34%

52.03%

-26.69%

IBRN vs. BITI - Expense Ratio Comparison

IBRN has a 0.47% expense ratio, which is lower than BITI's 1.03% expense ratio.


Dividends

IBRN vs. BITI - Dividend Comparison

IBRN's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 0.87%, less than BITI's 15.30% yield.


PositionTTM2025202420232022
BITI
ProShares Short Bitcoin ETF
15.17%1.60%3.91%3.33%0.06%
IBRN
iShares Neuroscience and Healthcare ETF
0.87%0.99%0.40%0.06%0.00%

Frequently Asked Questions


IBRN and BITI have a correlation of -0.32, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

BITI has higher volatility (9.13%) compared to IBRN (7.68%). In terms of maximum drawdown, IBRN dropped -35.38% vs BITI's -92.16%.

On 3-year performance, IBRN leads with 14.57% vs -31.77% for BITI. On fees, IBRN is cheaper at 0.47% per year. On volatility, IBRN has been the lower-risk option at 7.68%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Over the 3-year period, IBRN has performed better with a 14.57% return vs -31.77%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.

IBRN is cheaper with a 0.47% expense ratio, compared with 1.03% for BITI.

BITI has the higher dividend yield at 15.17%, compared with 0.87% for IBRN.

IBRN is categorized as Health & Biotech Equities, while BITI is Cryptocurrency. IBRN tracks NYSE FactSet Global Neuro Biopharma and MedTech Index, while BITI tracks Bloomberg Bitcoin Index. They also come from different issuers: iShares and ProShares. Their fees differ too: 0.47% for IBRN and 1.03% for BITI.

IBRN currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (2.29 vs 1.45), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for IBRN and BITI

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer