IBOT vs. WNTR

Last updated Jun 26, 2026

IBOT (VanEck Robotics ETF) and WNTR (YieldMax Short MSTR Option Income Strategy ETF) are both exchange-traded funds - IBOT is a Technology Equities fund tracking the BlueStar® Robotics Index, while WNTR is a Derivative Income fund actively managed by YieldMax. IBOT is passively managed, while WNTR is actively managed. Over the past year, IBOT returned 50.00% vs 115.98% for WNTR. At a correlation of -0.39, they often move in opposite directions. IBOT charges 0.47%/yr vs 1.01%/yr for WNTR.

Performance

IBOT vs. WNTR - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in VanEck Robotics ETF (IBOT) and YieldMax Short MSTR Option Income Strategy ETF (WNTR). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, IBOT achieves a 27.12% return, which is significantly higher than WNTR's 17.65% return.

IBOT

• 1D: 1.88%
• 1M: -0.43%
• YTD: 27.12%
• 6M: 26.43%
• 1Y: 50.00%
• 3Y*: 23.03%
• 5Y*: —
• 10Y*: —

WNTR

• 1D: 6.51%
• 1M: 45.64%
• YTD: 17.65%
• 6M: 21.49%
• 1Y: 115.98%
• 3Y*: —
• 5Y*: —
• 10Y*: —

*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

IBOT vs. WNTR - Yearly Performance Comparison

	2026 (YTD)	2025
IBOT VanEck Robotics ETF	27.12%	27.94%
WNTR YieldMax Short MSTR Option Income Strategy ETF	17.65%	52.78%

Correlation

The correlation between IBOT and WNTR is -0.36, meaning they tend to move in opposite directions. This is especially valuable for risk management - when one declines, the other has historically tended to hold steady or rise.

	Correlation
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	-0.36
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Mar 27, 2025	-0.39

Return for Risk

IBOT vs. WNTR — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

IBOT

IBOT Risk / Return Rank: 72
IBOT Sharpe Ratio Rank: 76
IBOT Sortino Ratio Rank: 71
IBOT Omega Ratio Rank: 71
IBOT Calmar Ratio Rank: 69
IBOT Martin Ratio Rank: 74

WNTR

WNTR Risk / Return Rank: 63
WNTR Sharpe Ratio Rank: 80
WNTR Sortino Ratio Rank: 60
WNTR Omega Ratio Rank: 64
WNTR Calmar Ratio Rank: 64
WNTR Martin Ratio Rank: 47

The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

IBOT vs. WNTR - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for VanEck Robotics ETF (IBOT) and YieldMax Short MSTR Option Income Strategy ETF (WNTR). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.

	IBOT	WNTR	Difference
Sharpe ratio: Return per unit of total volatility	2.12	2.20	-0.08
Sortino ratio: Return per unit of downside risk	2.79	2.46	+0.33
Omega ratio: Gain probability vs. loss probability	1.36	1.33	+0.03
Calmar ratio: Return relative to maximum drawdown	3.00	2.73	+0.27
Martin ratio: Return relative to average drawdown	12.06	6.99	+5.07

IBOT vs. WNTR - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current IBOT Sharpe Ratio is 2.12, which is comparable to the WNTR Sharpe Ratio of 2.20. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of IBOT and WNTR, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.

Drawdowns

IBOT vs. WNTR - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum IBOT drawdown since its inception was -25.39%, smaller than the maximum WNTR drawdown of -42.65%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for IBOT and WNTR.

Drawdown Indicators

	IBOT	WNTR	Difference
Max Drawdown Largest peak-to-trough decline	-25.39%	-42.65%	+17.26%
Max Drawdown (1Y) Largest decline over 1 year	-16.74%	-42.65%	+25.91%
Max Drawdown (3Y) Largest decline over 3 years	-25.39%	—	—
Current Drawdown Current decline from peak	-3.08%	-4.02%	+0.94%
Average Drawdown Average peak-to-trough decline	-4.99%	-20.87%	+15.88%
Ulcer Index Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks	4.16%	16.66%	-12.50%

Volatility

IBOT vs. WNTR - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for VanEck Robotics ETF (IBOT) is 10.48%, while YieldMax Short MSTR Option Income Strategy ETF (WNTR) has a volatility of 18.14%. This indicates that IBOT experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than WNTR based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.

Volatility by Period

	IBOT	WNTR	Difference
Volatility (1M) Calculated over the trailing 1-month period	10.48%	18.14%	-7.66%
Volatility (6M) Calculated over the trailing 6-month period	19.78%	46.41%	-26.63%
Volatility (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	23.70%	53.16%	-29.46%
Volatility (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized	22.57%	53.31%	-30.74%
Volatility (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized	22.57%	53.31%	-30.74%

IBOT vs. WNTR - Expense Ratio Comparison

IBOT has a 0.47% expense ratio, which is lower than WNTR's 1.01% expense ratio.

Dividends

IBOT vs. WNTR - Dividend Comparison

IBOT's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 0.30%, less than WNTR's 94.34% yield.

Position	TTM	2025	2024	2023
IBOT VanEck Robotics ETF	0.30%	0.38%	2.81%	2.06%
WNTR YieldMax Short MSTR Option Income Strategy ETF	94.34%	58.56%	0.00%	0.00%

Frequently Asked Questions

Can I hold both IBOT and WNTR in my portfolio?

IBOT and WNTR have a correlation of -0.36, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

Which is riskier, IBOT or WNTR?

WNTR has higher volatility (18.14%) compared to IBOT (10.48%). In terms of maximum drawdown, IBOT dropped -25.39% vs WNTR's -42.65%.

Which ETF is better, IBOT or WNTR?

On 1-year performance, WNTR leads with 115.98% vs 50.00% for IBOT. On fees, IBOT is cheaper at 0.47% per year. On volatility, IBOT has been the lower-risk option at 10.48%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Which ETF has performed better, IBOT or WNTR?

Over the 1-year period, WNTR has performed better with a 115.98% return vs 50.00%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.

Which ETF is cheaper, IBOT or WNTR?

IBOT is cheaper with a 0.47% expense ratio, compared with 1.01% for WNTR.

Which ETF pays a higher dividend yield, IBOT or WNTR?

WNTR has the higher dividend yield at 94.34%, compared with 0.30% for IBOT.

What is the main difference between IBOT and WNTR?

IBOT is categorized as Technology Equities, while WNTR is Derivative Income. They also come from different issuers: VanEck and YieldMax. Their fees differ too: 0.47% for IBOT and 1.01% for WNTR.

Which has better risk-adjusted returns?

WNTR currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (2.20 vs 2.12), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.