IBOT vs. IDGT
IBOT (VanEck Robotics ETF) and IDGT (iShares U.S. Digital Infrastructure and Real Estate ETF) are both Technology Equities funds - IBOT tracks the BlueStar® Robotics Index while IDGT tracks the S&P Data Center, Tower REIT and Communications Equipment Index - Benchmark TR Gross. Both are passively managed. Over the past 3 years, IBOT returned 23.27%/yr vs 25.08%/yr for IDGT. A 0.68 correlation means they provide meaningful diversification when combined. IBOT charges 0.47%/yr vs 0.41%/yr for IDGT.
Performance
IBOT vs. IDGT - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, IBOT achieves a 27.73% return, which is significantly lower than IDGT's 53.90% return.
IBOT
- 1D
- 0.33%
- 1M
- 8.89%
- YTD
- 27.73%
- 6M
- 28.82%
- 1Y
- 57.26%
- 3Y*
- 23.27%
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
IDGT
- 1D
- -1.58%
- 1M
- 8.43%
- YTD
- 53.90%
- 6M
- 49.82%
- 1Y
- 63.37%
- 3Y*
- 25.08%
- 5Y*
- 13.30%
- 10Y*
- 14.38%
IBOT vs. IDGT - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|
IBOT VanEck Robotics ETF | 27.73% | 28.57% | 6.39% | 18.90% |
IDGT iShares U.S. Digital Infrastructure and Real Estate ETF | 53.90% | 6.79% | 26.71% | -6.93% |
Correlation
The correlation between IBOT and IDGT is 0.62, which is moderate. They share some common price drivers but move independently often enough to provide real diversification benefit when combined.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.62 |
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period | 0.68 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Apr 10, 2023 | 0.68 |
The correlation between IBOT and IDGT has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.62 to 0.68 - a consistent structural relationship.
IBOT vs. IDGT - Sectors Allocation Comparison
Sectors
IBOT
IDGT
Technology
Industrials
-
Energy
-
Consumer Cyclical
-
Healthcare
-
Basic Materials
-
-
Communication Services
-
Consumer Defensive
-
-
Financial Services
-
-
Real Estate
-
Utilities
-
-
Technology
IBOT
IDGT
Industrials
IBOT
IDGT
-
Energy
IBOT
IDGT
-
Consumer Cyclical
IBOT
IDGT
-
Healthcare
IBOT
IDGT
-
Basic Materials
IBOT
-
IDGT
-
Communication Services
IBOT
-
IDGT
Consumer Defensive
IBOT
-
IDGT
-
Financial Services
IBOT
-
IDGT
-
Real Estate
IBOT
-
IDGT
Utilities
IBOT
-
IDGT
-
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
IBOT vs. IDGT — Risk / Return Rank
IBOT
IDGT
IBOT vs. IDGT - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for VanEck Robotics ETF (IBOT) and iShares U.S. Digital Infrastructure and Real Estate ETF (IDGT). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
| IBOT | IDGT | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | -0.50 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | -0.50 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.44 | 1.52 | -0.09 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 3.44 | 7.54 | -4.10 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 14.10 | 22.58 | -8.48 |
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month. | |||
Loading charts...
Sharpe Ratios by Period
| IBOT | IDGT | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe Ratio (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 2.63 | 3.13 | -0.50 |
Sharpe Ratio (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | — | 0.58 | — |
Sharpe Ratio (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | — | 0.62 | — |
Sharpe Ratio (All Time)Calculated using the full available price history | 1.19 | 0.18 | +1.00 |
Drawdowns
IBOT vs. IDGT - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum IBOT drawdown since its inception was -25.39%, smaller than the maximum IDGT drawdown of -77.95%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for IBOT and IDGT.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| IBOT | IDGT | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -25.39% | -77.95% | +52.56% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -16.74% | -8.45% | -8.29% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -25.39% | -23.74% | -1.65% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | — | -35.83% | — |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | — | -36.88% | — |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | 0.00% | -1.58% | +1.58% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -5.04% | -19.91% | +14.87% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 4.07% | 2.81% | +1.26% |
Volatility
IBOT vs. IDGT - Volatility Comparison
The current volatility for VanEck Robotics ETF (IBOT) is 7.25%, while iShares U.S. Digital Infrastructure and Real Estate ETF (IDGT) has a volatility of 7.87%. This indicates that IBOT experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than IDGT based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| IBOT | IDGT | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 7.25% | 7.87% | -0.62% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 17.59% | 16.35% | +1.24% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 21.86% | 20.41% | +1.45% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 22.09% | 23.20% | -1.11% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 22.09% | 23.29% | -1.20% |
IBOT vs. IDGT - Expense Ratio Comparison
IBOT has a 0.47% expense ratio, which is higher than IDGT's 0.41% expense ratio.
Dividends
IBOT vs. IDGT - Dividend Comparison
IBOT's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 0.30%, less than IDGT's 0.72% yield.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
IBOT VanEck Robotics ETF | 0.30% | 0.38% | 2.81% | 2.06% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
IDGT iShares U.S. Digital Infrastructure and Real Estate ETF | 0.72% | 1.17% | 1.64% | 0.37% | 0.30% | 0.28% | 0.60% | 0.42% | 0.65% | 0.57% | 0.75% | 0.72% |
Frequently Asked Questions
IBOT and IDGT have a correlation of 0.62, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
IDGT has higher volatility (7.87%) compared to IBOT (7.25%). In terms of maximum drawdown, IBOT dropped -25.39% vs IDGT's -77.95%.
On 3-year performance, IDGT leads with 25.08% vs 23.27% for IBOT. On fees, IDGT is cheaper at 0.41% per year. On volatility, IBOT has been the lower-risk option at 7.25%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
Over the 3-year period, IDGT has performed better with a 25.08% return vs 23.27%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.
IDGT is cheaper with a 0.41% expense ratio, compared with 0.47% for IBOT.
IDGT has the higher dividend yield at 0.72%, compared with 0.30% for IBOT.
IBOT tracks BlueStar® Robotics Index, while IDGT tracks S&P Data Center, Tower REIT and Communications Equipment Index - Benchmark TR Gross. They also come from different issuers: VanEck and iShares. Their fees differ too: 0.47% for IBOT and 0.41% for IDGT.
IDGT currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (3.13 vs 2.63), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.
Find the right allocation for IBOT and IDGT
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer