PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo

Documentation

Upgrade your plan
IBOT vs. ARKQ
Performance
Return for Risk
Dividends
Drawdowns
Volatility

IBOT vs. ARKQ

Last updated Apr 2, 2026

Compare and contrast key facts about VanEck Robotics ETF (IBOT) and ARK Autonomous Technology & Robotics ETF (ARKQ).

IBOT and ARKQ are both exchange-traded funds (ETFs), meaning they are traded on stock exchanges and can be bought and sold throughout the day. IBOT is a passively managed fund by VanEck that tracks the performance of the BlueStar® Robotics Index. It was launched on Apr 5, 2023. ARKQ is an actively managed fund by ARK. It was launched on Sep 30, 2014.

Performance

IBOT vs. ARKQ - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in VanEck Robotics ETF (IBOT) and ARK Autonomous Technology & Robotics ETF (ARKQ). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading graphics...

IBOT vs. ARKQ - Yearly Performance Comparison

2026 (YTD)202520242023
IBOT
VanEck Robotics ETF		3.41%28.57%6.39%18.90%
ARKQ
ARK Autonomous Technology & Robotics ETF		-0.13%48.81%33.88%21.27%

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, IBOT achieves a 3.41% return, which is significantly higher than ARKQ's -0.13% return.

IBOT

1D
2.41%
1M
-8.78%
YTD
3.41%
6M
8.50%
1Y
38.92%
3Y*
—
5Y*
—
10Y*
—

ARKQ

1D
1.83%
1M
-7.58%
YTD
-0.13%
6M
1.13%
1Y
72.46%
3Y*
31.67%
5Y*
6.35%
10Y*
20.55%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.

VanEck Robotics ETF

ARK Autonomous Technology & Robotics ETF

Often compared with IBOT:
IBOT vs. ROBOIBOT vs. BOTZIBOT vs. IRBOIBOT vs. ROBTIBOT vs. BOTTIBOT vs. SMHIBOT vs. SOXX
Often compared with ARKQ:
ARKQ vs. BOTZARKQ vs. ARKKARKQ vs. QTUMARKQ vs. ROBOARKQ vs. ARKWARKQ vs. IRBOARKQ vs. ARKG

IBOT vs. ARKQ - Expense Ratio Comparison

IBOT has a 0.47% expense ratio, which is lower than ARKQ's 0.75% expense ratio.

ARKQ
ARK Autonomous Technology & Robotics ETF
IBOT
VanEck Robotics ETF

Return for Risk

IBOT vs. ARKQ — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.
IBOT
IBOT Risk / Return Rank: 7979
Overall Rank
IBOT Sharpe Ratio Rank: 7979
Sharpe Ratio Rank
IBOT Sortino Ratio Rank: 8181
Sortino Ratio Rank
IBOT Omega Ratio Rank: 7777
Omega Ratio Rank
IBOT Calmar Ratio Rank: 8080
Calmar Ratio Rank
IBOT Martin Ratio Rank: 8080
Martin Ratio Rank
ARKQ
ARKQ Risk / Return Rank: 8888
Overall Rank
ARKQ Sharpe Ratio Rank: 9090
Sharpe Ratio Rank
ARKQ Sortino Ratio Rank: 9090
Sortino Ratio Rank
ARKQ Omega Ratio Rank: 8282
Omega Ratio Rank
ARKQ Calmar Ratio Rank: 9393
Calmar Ratio Rank
ARKQ Martin Ratio Rank: 8888
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

IBOT vs. ARKQ - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for VanEck Robotics ETF (IBOT) and ARK Autonomous Technology & Robotics ETF (ARKQ). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

IBOTARKQDifference

Sharpe ratio

Return per unit of total volatility

1.52

2.00

-0.47

Sortino ratio

Return per unit of downside risk

2.16

2.60

-0.44

Omega ratio

Gain probability vs. loss probability

1.30

1.33

-0.03

Calmar ratio

Return relative to maximum drawdown

2.33

3.56

-1.23

Martin ratio

Return relative to average drawdown

9.18

11.10

-1.92

Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month.

IBOT vs. ARKQ - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current IBOT Sharpe Ratio is 1.52, which is comparable to the ARKQ Sharpe Ratio of 2.00. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of IBOT and ARKQ, offering insights into how both investments have performed under varying market conditions. These values are calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months.

Loading graphics...

Sharpe Ratios by Period

IBOTARKQDifference

Sharpe Ratio (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

1.52

2.00

-0.47

Sharpe Ratio (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

—

0.20

—

Sharpe Ratio (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

—

0.70

—

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

0.88

0.60

+0.27

Correlation

The correlation between IBOT and ARKQ is 0.75, which is considered to be high. That indicates a strong positive relationship between their price movements. Having highly-correlated positions in a portfolio may signal a lack of diversification, potentially leading to increased risk during market downturns.

Dividends

IBOT vs. ARKQ - Dividend Comparison

IBOT's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 0.37%, more than ARKQ's 0.27% yield.

TTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
IBOT
VanEck Robotics ETF		0.37%0.38%2.81%2.06%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%
ARKQ
ARK Autonomous Technology & Robotics ETF		0.27%0.27%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.80%0.86%0.00%2.86%1.54%0.00%0.98%

Drawdowns

IBOT vs. ARKQ - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum IBOT drawdown since its inception was -25.39%, smaller than the maximum ARKQ drawdown of -59.89%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for IBOT and ARKQ.

Loading graphics...

Drawdown Indicators

IBOTARKQDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-25.39%

-59.89%

+34.50%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-16.74%

-20.58%

+3.84%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

—

-55.71%

—

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

—

-59.89%

—

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-11.14%

-14.58%

+3.44%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-5.19%

-17.43%

+12.24%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

4.25%

6.60%

-2.35%

Volatility

IBOT vs. ARKQ - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for VanEck Robotics ETF (IBOT) is 9.23%, while ARK Autonomous Technology & Robotics ETF (ARKQ) has a volatility of 11.83%. This indicates that IBOT experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than ARKQ based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.

Loading graphics...

Volatility by Period

IBOTARKQDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

9.23%

11.83%

-2.60%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

16.76%

25.90%

-9.14%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

25.67%

36.50%

-10.83%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

21.81%

31.96%

-10.15%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

21.81%

29.63%

-7.82%