PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
IBMT vs. DBE
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

IBMT vs. DBE - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in iShares iBonds Dec 2031 Term Muni Bond ETF (IBMT) and Invesco DB Energy Fund (DBE). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, IBMT achieves a 0.19% return, which is significantly lower than DBE's 83.68% return.


IBMT

1D
-0.02%
1M
0.35%
YTD
0.19%
6M
0.25%
1Y
6.34%
3Y*
5Y*
10Y*

DBE

1D
2.33%
1M
-5.45%
YTD
83.68%
6M
74.95%
1Y
84.41%
3Y*
23.42%
5Y*
19.66%
10Y*
12.03%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

IBMT vs. DBE - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)2025
IBMT
iShares iBonds Dec 2031 Term Muni Bond ETF
0.19%7.26%
DBE
Invesco DB Energy Fund
83.68%-5.02%

Correlation

The correlation between IBMT and DBE is -0.25, meaning they tend to move in opposite directions. This is especially valuable for risk management - when one declines, the other has historically tended to hold steady or rise.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

-0.25

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Mar 27, 2025

-0.21

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

IBMT vs. DBE — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

IBMT
IBMT Risk / Return Rank: 6060
Overall Rank
IBMT Sharpe Ratio Rank: 6262
Sharpe Ratio Rank
IBMT Sortino Ratio Rank: 7676
Sortino Ratio Rank
IBMT Omega Ratio Rank: 7878
Omega Ratio Rank
IBMT Calmar Ratio Rank: 4343
Calmar Ratio Rank
IBMT Martin Ratio Rank: 3939
Martin Ratio Rank

DBE
DBE Risk / Return Rank: 7171
Overall Rank
DBE Sharpe Ratio Rank: 7474
Sharpe Ratio Rank
DBE Sortino Ratio Rank: 6363
Sortino Ratio Rank
DBE Omega Ratio Rank: 6565
Omega Ratio Rank
DBE Calmar Ratio Rank: 9191
Calmar Ratio Rank
DBE Martin Ratio Rank: 6363
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

IBMT vs. DBE - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for iShares iBonds Dec 2031 Term Muni Bond ETF (IBMT) and Invesco DB Energy Fund (DBE). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


IBMTDBEDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

-0.38

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

+0.43

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.46

1.40

+0.06

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

2.06

5.89

-3.83

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

6.13

11.53

-5.40

IBMT vs. DBE - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current IBMT Sharpe Ratio is 2.05, which is comparable to the DBE Sharpe Ratio of 2.43. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of IBMT and DBE, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Sharpe Ratios by Period


IBMTDBEDifference

Sharpe Ratio (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

2.05

2.43

-0.38

Sharpe Ratio (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.67

Sharpe Ratio (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.43

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

1.63

0.09

+1.53

Drawdowns

IBMT vs. DBE - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum IBMT drawdown since its inception was -3.18%, smaller than the maximum DBE drawdown of -86.69%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for IBMT and DBE.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


IBMTDBEDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-3.18%

-86.69%

+83.51%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-3.10%

-14.41%

+11.31%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-23.89%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-38.74%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-60.84%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-1.65%

-30.27%

+28.62%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-0.74%

-57.31%

+56.57%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

1.04%

7.35%

-6.31%

Volatility

IBMT vs. DBE - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for iShares iBonds Dec 2031 Term Muni Bond ETF (IBMT) is 0.78%, while Invesco DB Energy Fund (DBE) has a volatility of 12.95%. This indicates that IBMT experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than DBE based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


IBMTDBEDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

0.78%

12.95%

-12.17%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

2.06%

30.86%

-28.80%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

3.11%

34.97%

-31.86%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

3.86%

29.39%

-25.53%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

3.86%

28.33%

-24.47%

IBMT vs. DBE - Expense Ratio Comparison

IBMT has a 0.18% expense ratio, which is lower than DBE's 0.78% expense ratio.


Dividends

IBMT vs. DBE - Dividend Comparison

IBMT's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 3.65%, more than DBE's 2.10% yield.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018
DBE
Invesco DB Energy Fund
2.10%3.86%6.32%3.87%0.75%0.00%0.00%1.79%1.67%
IBMT
iShares iBonds Dec 2031 Term Muni Bond ETF
3.65%2.98%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%

Frequently Asked Questions


IBMT and DBE have a correlation of -0.25, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

DBE has higher volatility (12.95%) compared to IBMT (0.78%). In terms of maximum drawdown, IBMT dropped -3.18% vs DBE's -86.69%.

On 1-year performance, DBE leads with 84.41% vs 6.34% for IBMT. On fees, IBMT is cheaper at 0.18% per year. On volatility, IBMT has been the lower-risk option at 0.78%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Over the 1-year period, DBE has performed better with a 84.41% return vs 6.34%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.

IBMT is cheaper with a 0.18% expense ratio, compared with 0.78% for DBE.

IBMT has the higher dividend yield at 3.65%, compared with 2.10% for DBE.

IBMT is categorized as Municipal Bonds, while DBE is Oil & Gas. IBMT tracks S&P AMT-Free Municipal Series Dec 2031 Index, while DBE tracks DBIQ Optimum Yield Energy Index. They also come from different issuers: iShares and Invesco. Their fees differ too: 0.18% for IBMT and 0.78% for DBE.

DBE currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (2.43 vs 2.05), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for IBMT and DBE

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer