IBMO vs. TAXS
IBMO (iShares iBonds Dec 2026 Term Muni Bond ETF) and TAXS (Northern Trust Short-Term Tax-Exempt Bond ETF) are both Municipal Bonds funds - IBMO tracks the S&P AMT-Free Municipal Series Callable-Adjusted Dec 2026 Index while TAXS tracks the ICE Short Term Focused Municipal Bond Index. Both are passively managed. At a 0.13 correlation, their price movements are largely independent. IBMO charges 0.18%/yr vs 0.05%/yr for TAXS.
Performance
IBMO vs. TAXS - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
The year-to-date returns for both investments are quite close, with IBMO having a 0.95% return and TAXS slightly higher at 0.99%.
IBMO
- 1D
- 0.01%
- 1M
- 0.17%
- YTD
- 0.95%
- 6M
- 1.30%
- 1Y
- 2.78%
- 3Y*
- 2.93%
- 5Y*
- 0.67%
- 10Y*
- —
TAXS
- 1D
- 0.06%
- 1M
- 0.59%
- YTD
- 0.99%
- 6M
- 1.39%
- 1Y
- —
- 3Y*
- —
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
IBMO vs. TAXS - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | |
|---|---|---|
IBMO iShares iBonds Dec 2026 Term Muni Bond ETF | 0.95% | 0.85% |
TAXS Northern Trust Short-Term Tax-Exempt Bond ETF | 0.99% | 1.22% |
Correlation
The correlation between IBMO and TAXS is 0.13, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Aug 20, 2025 | 0.13 |
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
IBMO vs. TAXS — Risk / Return Rank
IBMO
TAXS
IBMO vs. TAXS - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for iShares iBonds Dec 2026 Term Muni Bond ETF (IBMO) and Northern Trust Short-Term Tax-Exempt Bond ETF (TAXS). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
| IBMO | TAXS | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | — | — | |
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | — | — | |
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.53 | — | — |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 7.38 | — | — |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 21.93 | — | — |
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month. | |||
Loading charts...
Sharpe Ratios by Period
| IBMO | TAXS | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe Ratio (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 2.54 | — | — |
Sharpe Ratio (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.31 | — | — |
Sharpe Ratio (All Time)Calculated using the full available price history | 0.41 | 2.85 | -2.44 |
Drawdowns
IBMO vs. TAXS - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum IBMO drawdown since its inception was -14.77%, which is greater than TAXS's maximum drawdown of -0.84%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for IBMO and TAXS.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| IBMO | TAXS | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -14.77% | -0.84% | -13.93% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -0.38% | — | — |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -1.76% | — | — |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -8.86% | — | — |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | 0.00% | -0.03% | +0.03% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -2.32% | -0.24% | -2.08% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 0.13% | — | — |
Volatility
IBMO vs. TAXS - Volatility Comparison
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| IBMO | TAXS | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 0.19% | — | — |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 0.83% | — | — |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 1.10% | 1.00% | +0.10% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 2.15% | 1.00% | +1.15% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 4.52% | 1.00% | +3.52% |
IBMO vs. TAXS - Expense Ratio Comparison
IBMO has a 0.18% expense ratio, which is higher than TAXS's 0.05% expense ratio. However, both funds are considered low-cost compared to the broader market, where average expense ratios usually range from 0.3% to 0.9%.
Dividends
IBMO vs. TAXS - Dividend Comparison
IBMO's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 2.39%, more than TAXS's 1.82% yield.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
IBMO iShares iBonds Dec 2026 Term Muni Bond ETF | 2.39% | 2.37% | 2.15% | 1.65% | 0.89% | 0.62% | 1.03% | 1.01% |
TAXS Northern Trust Short-Term Tax-Exempt Bond ETF | 1.82% | 0.74% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
Frequently Asked Questions
IBMO and TAXS have a correlation of 0.13, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
On fees, TAXS is cheaper at 0.05% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
TAXS is cheaper with a 0.05% expense ratio, compared with 0.18% for IBMO.
IBMO has the higher dividend yield at 2.39%, compared with 1.82% for TAXS.
IBMO tracks S&P AMT-Free Municipal Series Callable-Adjusted Dec 2026 Index, while TAXS tracks ICE Short Term Focused Municipal Bond Index. They also come from different issuers: iShares and Northern Trust. Their fees differ too: 0.18% for IBMO and 0.05% for TAXS.
Find the right allocation for IBMO and TAXS
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer