IBMN vs. CA
Compare and contrast key facts about iShares iBonds Dec 2025 Term Muni Bond ETF (IBMN) and Xtrackers California Municipal Bond ETF (CA).
IBMN and CA are both exchange-traded funds (ETFs), meaning they are traded on stock exchanges and can be bought and sold throughout the day. IBMN is a passively managed fund by iShares that tracks the performance of the S&P AMT-Free Municipal Series Dec 2025 Index. It was launched on Nov 13, 2018. CA is a passively managed fund by Xtrackers that tracks the performance of the ICE AMT-Free Broad Liquid California Municipal Index - Benchmark TR Gross. It was launched on Dec 13, 2023. Both IBMN and CA are passive ETFs, meaning that they are not actively managed but aim to replicate the performance of the underlying index as closely as possible.
Performance
IBMN vs. CA - Performance Comparison
Loading graphics...
IBMN vs. CA - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|
IBMN iShares iBonds Dec 2025 Term Muni Bond ETF | 0.00% | 2.49% | 2.33% | 0.17% |
CA Xtrackers California Municipal Bond ETF | -0.08% | 3.05% | 1.51% | 0.79% |
Returns By Period
IBMN
- 1D
- 0.00%
- 1M
- 0.00%
- YTD
- 0.00%
- 6M
- 0.38%
- 1Y
- 1.62%
- 3Y*
- 2.01%
- 5Y*
- 0.57%
- 10Y*
- —
CA
- 1D
- 0.38%
- 1M
- -2.00%
- YTD
- -0.08%
- 6M
- 1.22%
- 1Y
- 3.88%
- 3Y*
- —
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
IBMN vs. CA - Expense Ratio Comparison
IBMN has a 0.18% expense ratio, which is higher than CA's 0.07% expense ratio. However, both funds are considered low-cost compared to the broader market, where average expense ratios usually range from 0.3% to 0.9%.
Return for Risk
IBMN vs. CA — Risk / Return Rank
IBMN
CA
IBMN vs. CA - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for iShares iBonds Dec 2025 Term Muni Bond ETF (IBMN) and Xtrackers California Municipal Bond ETF (CA). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
| IBMN | CA | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | 1.06 | 0.89 | +0.17 |
Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | 1.59 | 1.17 | +0.43 |
Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.40 | 1.21 | +0.19 |
Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 2.14 | 1.17 | +0.97 |
Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 22.84 | 3.35 | +19.49 |
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month. | |||
Loading graphics...
Sharpe Ratios by Period
| IBMN | CA | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe Ratio (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 1.06 | 0.89 | +0.17 |
Sharpe Ratio (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.32 | — | — |
Sharpe Ratio (All Time)Calculated using the full available price history | 0.59 | 0.57 | +0.02 |
Correlation
The correlation between IBMN and CA is 0.25, which is considered to be low. This implies their price changes are not closely related. A low correlation is generally favorable for portfolio diversification, as it helps to reduce overall risk by spreading it across multiple assets with different performance patterns.
Dividends
IBMN vs. CA - Dividend Comparison
IBMN's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 1.68%, less than CA's 3.20% yield.
| TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
IBMN iShares iBonds Dec 2025 Term Muni Bond ETF | 1.68% | 2.03% | 2.03% | 1.72% | 0.97% | 0.70% | 1.11% | 1.65% | 0.23% |
CA Xtrackers California Municipal Bond ETF | 3.20% | 3.14% | 3.03% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
Drawdowns
IBMN vs. CA - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum IBMN drawdown since its inception was -12.40%, which is greater than CA's maximum drawdown of -5.24%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for IBMN and CA.
Loading graphics...
Drawdown Indicators
| IBMN | CA | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -12.40% | -5.24% | -7.16% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -1.09% | -3.67% | +2.58% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -7.36% | — | — |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -0.05% | -2.00% | +1.95% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -1.85% | -1.30% | -0.55% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 0.10% | 1.28% | -1.18% |
Volatility
IBMN vs. CA - Volatility Comparison
The current volatility for iShares iBonds Dec 2025 Term Muni Bond ETF (IBMN) is 0.00%, while Xtrackers California Municipal Bond ETF (CA) has a volatility of 1.31%. This indicates that IBMN experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than CA based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading graphics...
Volatility by Period
| IBMN | CA | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 0.00% | 1.31% | -1.31% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 0.59% | 1.78% | -1.19% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 1.91% | 4.40% | -2.49% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 1.82% | 4.09% | -2.27% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 3.94% | 4.09% | -0.15% |