PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
IBMM vs. SMMU
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

IBMM vs. SMMU - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in iShares iBonds Dec 2024 Term Muni Bond ETF (IBMM) and PIMCO Short Term Municipal Bond Active ETF (SMMU). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period


IBMM

1D
0.00%
1M
0.00%
YTD
6M
1Y
3Y*
5Y*
10Y*

SMMU

1D
0.02%
1M
0.33%
YTD
1.12%
6M
1.32%
1Y
3.86%
3Y*
3.66%
5Y*
1.90%
10Y*
1.86%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

IBMM vs. SMMU - Yearly Performance Comparison


Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

IBMM vs. SMMU — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

IBMM

SMMU
SMMU Risk / Return Rank: 9292
Overall Rank
SMMU Sharpe Ratio Rank: 9595
Sharpe Ratio Rank
SMMU Sortino Ratio Rank: 9696
Sortino Ratio Rank
SMMU Omega Ratio Rank: 9797
Omega Ratio Rank
SMMU Calmar Ratio Rank: 8888
Calmar Ratio Rank
SMMU Martin Ratio Rank: 8686
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

IBMM vs. SMMU - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for iShares iBonds Dec 2024 Term Muni Bond ETF (IBMM) and PIMCO Short Term Municipal Bond Active ETF (SMMU). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


Risk / return metrics aren't available yet — we need at least 12 months of trading data to calculate them.

IBMM vs. SMMU - Sharpe Ratio Comparison


Loading charts...

Sharpe Ratios by Period


IBMMSMMUDifference

Sharpe Ratio (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

3.79

Sharpe Ratio (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

1.14

Sharpe Ratio (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.68

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

0.60

Drawdowns

IBMM vs. SMMU - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum IBMM drawdown since its inception was 0.00%, smaller than the maximum SMMU drawdown of -5.09%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for IBMM and SMMU.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


IBMMSMMUDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

0.00%

-5.09%

+5.09%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-0.77%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-1.95%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-4.76%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-5.09%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

0.00%

-0.01%

+0.01%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

0.00%

-0.55%

+0.55%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

0.22%

Volatility

IBMM vs. SMMU - Volatility Comparison


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


IBMMSMMUDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

0.31%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

0.79%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.00%

1.02%

-1.02%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

0.00%

1.67%

-1.67%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

0.00%

2.73%

-2.73%

IBMM vs. SMMU - Expense Ratio Comparison

IBMM has a 0.18% expense ratio, which is lower than SMMU's 0.35% expense ratio.


Dividends

IBMM vs. SMMU - Dividend Comparison

IBMM has not paid dividends to shareholders, while SMMU's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 2.84%.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
IBMM
iShares iBonds Dec 2024 Term Muni Bond ETF
0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%
SMMU
PIMCO Short Term Municipal Bond Active ETF
2.84%2.80%3.03%2.79%1.37%0.60%1.19%1.82%1.57%1.41%1.03%0.89%

Frequently Asked Questions


On fees, IBMM is cheaper at 0.18% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

IBMM is cheaper with a 0.18% expense ratio, compared with 0.35% for SMMU.

SMMU has the higher dividend yield at 2.84%, compared with 0.00% for IBMM.

They also come from different issuers: iShares and PIMCO. Their fees differ too: 0.18% for IBMM and 0.35% for SMMU.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for IBMM and SMMU

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer