IBMM vs. RVNU

Last updated Jun 5, 2026

IBMM (iShares iBonds Dec 2024 Term Muni Bond ETF) and RVNU (Xtrackers Municipal Infrastructure Revenue Bond ETF) are both Municipal Bonds funds - IBMM tracks the S&P AMT-Free Municipal Series Dec 2024 Index while RVNU tracks the Solactive Municipal Infrastructure Revenue Bond Index. Both are passively managed. IBMM charges 0.18%/yr vs 0.15%/yr for RVNU.

Performance

IBMM vs. RVNU - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in iShares iBonds Dec 2024 Term Muni Bond ETF (IBMM) and Xtrackers Municipal Infrastructure Revenue Bond ETF (RVNU). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Returns By Period

IBMM

• 1D: 0.00%
• 1M: 0.00%
• YTD: —
• 6M: —
• 1Y: —
• 3Y*: —
• 5Y*: —
• 10Y*: —

RVNU

• 1D: 0.18%
• 1M: 1.50%
• YTD: 3.90%
• 6M: 3.22%
• 1Y: 9.36%
• 3Y*: 3.44%
• 5Y*: -0.19%
• 10Y*: 1.93%

*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

IBMM vs. RVNU - Yearly Performance Comparison

	2026 (YTD)
IBMM iShares iBonds Dec 2024 Term Muni Bond ETF	0.00%
RVNU Xtrackers Municipal Infrastructure Revenue Bond ETF	2.99%

Return for Risk

IBMM vs. RVNU — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

RVNU

RVNU Risk / Return Rank: 62
RVNU Sharpe Ratio Rank: 55
RVNU Sortino Ratio Rank: 59
RVNU Omega Ratio Rank: 57
RVNU Calmar Ratio Rank: 77
RVNU Martin Ratio Rank: 63

The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

IBMM vs. RVNU - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for iShares iBonds Dec 2024 Term Muni Bond ETF (IBMM) and Xtrackers Municipal Infrastructure Revenue Bond ETF (RVNU). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Risk / return metrics aren't available yet — we need at least 12 months of trading data to calculate them.

Sharpe Ratios by Period

	IBMM	RVNU	Difference
Sharpe Ratio (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	—	1.84	—
Sharpe Ratio (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period	—	-0.03	—
Sharpe Ratio (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period	—	0.27	—
Sharpe Ratio (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history	—	0.39	—

Drawdowns

IBMM vs. RVNU - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum IBMM drawdown since its inception was 0.00%, smaller than the maximum RVNU drawdown of -23.51%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for IBMM and RVNU.

Drawdown Indicators

	IBMM	RVNU	Difference
Max Drawdown Largest peak-to-trough decline	0.00%	-23.51%	+23.51%
Max Drawdown (1Y) Largest decline over 1 year	—	-2.46%	—
Max Drawdown (3Y) Largest decline over 3 years	—	-10.35%	—
Max Drawdown (5Y) Largest decline over 5 years	—	-23.51%	—
Max Drawdown (10Y) Largest decline over 10 years	—	-23.51%	—
Current Drawdown Current decline from peak	0.00%	-2.63%	+2.63%
Average Drawdown Average peak-to-trough decline	0.00%	-4.98%	+4.98%
Ulcer Index Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks	—	0.83%	—

Volatility

Volatility by Period

	IBMM	RVNU	Difference
Volatility (1M) Calculated over the trailing 1-month period	—	1.43%	—
Volatility (6M) Calculated over the trailing 6-month period	—	3.41%	—
Volatility (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	0.00%	5.12%	-5.12%
Volatility (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized	0.00%	7.19%	-7.19%
Volatility (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized	0.00%	7.27%	-7.27%

IBMM vs. RVNU - Expense Ratio Comparison

IBMM has a 0.18% expense ratio, which is higher than RVNU's 0.15% expense ratio. However, both funds are considered low-cost compared to the broader market, where average expense ratios usually range from 0.3% to 0.9%.

Dividends

IBMM vs. RVNU - Dividend Comparison

IBMM has not paid dividends to shareholders, while RVNU's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 3.51%.

Position	TTM	2025	2024	2023	2022	2021	2020	2019	2018	2017	2016	2015
IBMM iShares iBonds Dec 2024 Term Muni Bond ETF	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%
RVNU Xtrackers Municipal Infrastructure Revenue Bond ETF	3.51%	3.46%	3.06%	2.79%	2.81%	2.18%	2.43%	2.75%	2.76%	2.49%	2.72%	3.01%

Frequently Asked Questions

Which ETF is better, IBMM or RVNU?

On fees, RVNU is cheaper at 0.15% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Which ETF is cheaper, IBMM or RVNU?

RVNU is cheaper with a 0.15% expense ratio, compared with 0.18% for IBMM.

Which ETF pays a higher dividend yield, IBMM or RVNU?

RVNU has the higher dividend yield at 3.51%, compared with 0.00% for IBMM.

What is the main difference between IBMM and RVNU?

IBMM tracks S&P AMT-Free Municipal Series Dec 2024 Index, while RVNU tracks Solactive Municipal Infrastructure Revenue Bond Index. They also come from different issuers: iShares and Deutsche Bank. Their fees differ too: 0.18% for IBMM and 0.15% for RVNU.