IBMM vs. MEAR
IBMM (iShares iBonds Dec 2024 Term Muni Bond ETF) and MEAR (iShares Short Maturity Municipal Bond ETF) are both Municipal Bonds funds from iShares. IBMM is passively managed, while MEAR is actively managed. IBMM charges 0.18%/yr vs 0.25%/yr for MEAR.
Performance
IBMM vs. MEAR - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
IBMM
- 1D
- 0.00%
- 1M
- 0.00%
- YTD
- —
- 6M
- —
- 1Y
- —
- 3Y*
- —
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
MEAR
- 1D
- -0.04%
- 1M
- 0.26%
- YTD
- 1.02%
- 6M
- 1.28%
- 1Y
- 3.23%
- 3Y*
- 3.55%
- 5Y*
- 2.42%
- 10Y*
- 1.78%
IBMM vs. MEAR - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | |
|---|---|
IBMM iShares iBonds Dec 2024 Term Muni Bond ETF | 0.00% |
MEAR iShares Short Maturity Municipal Bond ETF | 0.51% |
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
IBMM vs. MEAR — Risk / Return Rank
IBMM
MEAR
IBMM vs. MEAR - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for iShares iBonds Dec 2024 Term Muni Bond ETF (IBMM) and iShares Short Maturity Municipal Bond ETF (MEAR). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Risk / return metrics aren't available yet — we need at least 12 months of trading data to calculate them.
Loading charts...
Sharpe Ratios by Period
| IBMM | MEAR | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe Ratio (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | — | 3.78 | — |
Sharpe Ratio (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | — | 2.47 | — |
Sharpe Ratio (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | — | 1.18 | — |
Sharpe Ratio (All Time)Calculated using the full available price history | — | 1.11 | — |
Drawdowns
IBMM vs. MEAR - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum IBMM drawdown since its inception was 0.00%, smaller than the maximum MEAR drawdown of -2.68%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for IBMM and MEAR.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| IBMM | MEAR | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | 0.00% | -2.68% | +2.68% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | — | -0.47% | — |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | — | -0.86% | — |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | — | -1.12% | — |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | — | -2.68% | — |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | 0.00% | -0.04% | +0.04% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | 0.00% | -0.19% | +0.19% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | — | 0.11% | — |
Volatility
IBMM vs. MEAR - Volatility Comparison
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| IBMM | MEAR | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | — | 0.24% | — |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | — | 0.61% | — |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.00% | 0.86% | -0.86% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 0.00% | 0.98% | -0.98% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 0.00% | 1.52% | -1.52% |
IBMM vs. MEAR - Expense Ratio Comparison
IBMM has a 0.18% expense ratio, which is lower than MEAR's 0.25% expense ratio. Despite the difference, both funds are considered low-cost compared to the broader market, where average expense ratios usually range from 0.3% to 0.9%.
Dividends
IBMM vs. MEAR - Dividend Comparison
IBMM has not paid dividends to shareholders, while MEAR's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 2.84%.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
IBMM iShares iBonds Dec 2024 Term Muni Bond ETF | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
MEAR iShares Short Maturity Municipal Bond ETF | 2.84% | 2.95% | 3.44% | 3.30% | 0.88% | 0.30% | 0.90% | 1.57% | 1.36% | 1.01% | 0.81% | 0.53% |
Frequently Asked Questions
On fees, IBMM is cheaper at 0.18% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
IBMM is cheaper with a 0.18% expense ratio, compared with 0.25% for MEAR.
MEAR has the higher dividend yield at 2.84%, compared with 0.00% for IBMM.
Their fees differ too: 0.18% for IBMM and 0.25% for MEAR.
Find the right allocation for IBMM and MEAR
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer