PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
IBMM vs. INMU
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

IBMM vs. INMU - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in iShares iBonds Dec 2024 Term Muni Bond ETF (IBMM) and BlackRock Intermediate Muni Income Bond ETF (INMU). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period


IBMM

1D
0.00%
1M
0.00%
YTD
6M
1Y
3Y*
5Y*
10Y*

INMU

1D
0.08%
1M
0.61%
YTD
1.81%
6M
2.11%
1Y
7.08%
3Y*
4.84%
5Y*
1.80%
10Y*
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

IBMM vs. INMU - Yearly Performance Comparison


Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

IBMM vs. INMU — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

IBMM

INMU
INMU Risk / Return Rank: 7676
Overall Rank
INMU Sharpe Ratio Rank: 8787
Sharpe Ratio Rank
INMU Sortino Ratio Rank: 9090
Sortino Ratio Rank
INMU Omega Ratio Rank: 9393
Omega Ratio Rank
INMU Calmar Ratio Rank: 5757
Calmar Ratio Rank
INMU Martin Ratio Rank: 5555
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

IBMM vs. INMU - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for iShares iBonds Dec 2024 Term Muni Bond ETF (IBMM) and BlackRock Intermediate Muni Income Bond ETF (INMU). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


Risk / return metrics aren't available yet — we need at least 12 months of trading data to calculate them.

IBMM vs. INMU - Sharpe Ratio Comparison


Loading charts...

Sharpe Ratios by Period


IBMMINMUDifference

Sharpe Ratio (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

2.84

Sharpe Ratio (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.50

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

0.60

Drawdowns

IBMM vs. INMU - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum IBMM drawdown since its inception was 0.00%, smaller than the maximum INMU drawdown of -10.67%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for IBMM and INMU.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


IBMMINMUDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

0.00%

-10.67%

+10.67%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-2.58%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-4.88%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-10.67%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

0.00%

-0.58%

+0.58%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

0.00%

-2.81%

+2.81%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

0.75%

Volatility

IBMM vs. INMU - Volatility Comparison


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


IBMMINMUDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

0.81%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

1.87%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.00%

2.51%

-2.51%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

0.00%

3.60%

-3.60%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

0.00%

3.54%

-3.54%

IBMM vs. INMU - Expense Ratio Comparison

IBMM has a 0.18% expense ratio, which is lower than INMU's 0.30% expense ratio.


Dividends

IBMM vs. INMU - Dividend Comparison

IBMM has not paid dividends to shareholders, while INMU's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 3.35%.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021
IBMM
iShares iBonds Dec 2024 Term Muni Bond ETF
0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%
INMU
BlackRock Intermediate Muni Income Bond ETF
3.35%3.48%3.47%3.44%1.92%1.14%

Frequently Asked Questions


On fees, IBMM is cheaper at 0.18% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

IBMM is cheaper with a 0.18% expense ratio, compared with 0.30% for INMU.

INMU has the higher dividend yield at 3.35%, compared with 0.00% for IBMM.

They also come from different issuers: iShares and BlackRock. Their fees differ too: 0.18% for IBMM and 0.30% for INMU.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for IBMM and INMU

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer