IBM vs. DDOG
IBM (International Business Machines Corporation) and DDOG (Datadog, Inc.) are both stocks. Both are in the Technology sector — IBM in Information Technology Services, DDOG in Software - Application. Over the past 5 years, IBM returned 18.01%/yr vs 19.21%/yr for DDOG. At a 0.17 correlation, their price movements are largely independent.
Performance
IBM vs. DDOG - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, IBM achieves a -6.89% return, which is significantly lower than DDOG's 69.06% return.
IBM
- 1D
- -0.95%
- 1M
- 26.84%
- YTD
- -6.89%
- 6M
- -10.81%
- 1Y
- -0.65%
- 3Y*
- 29.65%
- 5Y*
- 18.01%
- 10Y*
- 11.09%
DDOG
- 1D
- -1.85%
- 1M
- 11.98%
- YTD
- 69.06%
- 6M
- 57.47%
- 1Y
- 87.40%
- 3Y*
- 32.99%
- 5Y*
- 19.21%
- 10Y*
- —
IBM vs. DDOG - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
IBM International Business Machines Corporation | -6.89% | 38.23% | 39.27% | 21.85% | 10.64% | 16.65% | -1.16% | -4.64% |
DDOG Datadog, Inc. | 69.06% | -4.83% | 17.72% | 65.14% | -58.73% | 80.93% | 160.56% | -6.37% |
Correlation
The correlation between IBM and DDOG is 0.38, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.38 |
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period | 0.31 |
Correlation (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.24 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Sep 19, 2019 | 0.17 |
Over the past year, IBM and DDOG have become more correlated (0.38) than their long-term average of 0.17, meaning their price movements have been converging.
Fundamentals
IBM:
$259.20B
DDOG:
$83.85B
IBM:
$11.32
DDOG:
$0.37
IBM:
24.05
DDOG:
615.76
IBM:
0.29
DDOG:
5.52
IBM:
3.75
DDOG:
22.75
IBM:
7.86
DDOG:
21.02
IBM:
$68.91B
DDOG:
$3.67B
IBM:
$40.64B
DDOG:
$2.93B
IBM:
$15.71B
DDOG:
$173.48M
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
IBM vs. DDOG — Risk / Return Rank
IBM
DDOG
IBM vs. DDOG - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for International Business Machines Corporation (IBM) and Datadog, Inc. (DDOG). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.
| IBM | DDOG | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | -1.36 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | -2.17 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.04 | 1.30 | -0.26 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | -0.02 | 1.81 | -1.83 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | -0.05 | 3.53 | -3.57 |
Loading charts...
Drawdowns
IBM vs. DDOG - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum IBM drawdown since its inception was -69.40%, roughly equal to the maximum DDOG drawdown of -68.11%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for IBM and DDOG.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| IBM | DDOG | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -69.40% | -68.11% | -1.29% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -30.96% | -48.62% | +17.66% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -30.96% | -48.62% | +17.66% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -30.96% | -68.11% | +37.15% |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | -40.59% | — | — |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -17.31% | -17.15% | -0.16% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -20.12% | -30.96% | +10.84% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 14.38% | 24.87% | -10.49% |
Volatility
IBM vs. DDOG - Volatility Comparison
International Business Machines Corporation (IBM) has a higher volatility of 21.43% compared to Datadog, Inc. (DDOG) at 19.12%. This indicates that IBM's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than DDOG based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| IBM | DDOG | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 21.43% | 19.12% | +2.31% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 34.62% | 50.53% | -15.91% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 39.45% | 65.62% | -26.17% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 27.16% | 58.24% | -31.08% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 26.59% | 60.05% | -33.46% |
Dividends
IBM vs. DDOG - Dividend Comparison
IBM's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 2.47%, while DDOG has not paid dividends to shareholders.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
DDOG Datadog, Inc. | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
IBM International Business Machines Corporation | 2.47% | 2.27% | 3.03% | 4.05% | 4.68% | 4.74% | 5.17% | 4.80% | 5.46% | 3.85% | 3.31% | 3.63% |
Financials
IBM vs. DDOG - Financials Comparison
This section allows you to compare key financial metrics between International Business Machines Corporation and Datadog, Inc.. You can select fields from income statements, balance sheets, and cash flow statements to easily visualize and compare the financial health of both companies.
Total Revenue: Total amount of money received from sales and other business activities
IBM vs. DDOG - Profitability Comparison
IBM - Gross Margin
Gross margin is calculated as gross profit divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, International Business Machines Corporation reported a gross profit of 8.95B and revenue of 15.92B. Therefore, the gross margin over that period was 56.2%.
DDOG - Gross Margin
Gross margin is calculated as gross profit divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, Datadog, Inc. reported a gross profit of 797.20M and revenue of 1.01B. Therefore, the gross margin over that period was 79.2%.
IBM - Operating Margin
Operating margin is calculated as operating income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, International Business Machines Corporation reported an operating income of 1.22B and revenue of 15.92B, resulting in an operating margin of 7.6%.
DDOG - Operating Margin
Operating margin is calculated as operating income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, Datadog, Inc. reported an operating income of 7.33M and revenue of 1.01B, resulting in an operating margin of 0.7%.
IBM - Net Margin
Net margin is calculated as net income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, International Business Machines Corporation reported a net income of 1.22B and revenue of 15.92B, resulting in a net margin of 7.6%.
DDOG - Net Margin
Net margin is calculated as net income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, Datadog, Inc. reported a net income of 52.57M and revenue of 1.01B, resulting in a net margin of 5.2%.
Frequently Asked Questions
IBM and DDOG have a correlation of 0.38, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
IBM has higher volatility (21.43%) compared to DDOG (19.12%). In terms of maximum drawdown, IBM dropped -69.40% vs DDOG's -68.11%.
DDOG currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (1.34 vs -0.02), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.
Find the right allocation for IBM and DDOG
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer