IBLC vs. SOXX
IBLC (iShares Blockchain and Tech ETF) and SOXX (iShares Semiconductor ETF) are both exchange-traded funds - IBLC is a Cryptocurrency fund tracking the ICE FactSet Global Blockchain Technologies Index, while SOXX is a Semiconductors fund tracking the NYSE Semiconductor Index. Both are passively managed. Over the past 3 years, IBLC returned 48.31%/yr vs 57.39%/yr for SOXX. A 0.59 correlation means they provide meaningful diversification when combined. IBLC charges 0.47%/yr vs 0.34%/yr for SOXX.
Performance
IBLC vs. SOXX - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, IBLC achieves a 32.34% return, which is significantly lower than SOXX's 104.57% return.
IBLC
- 1D
- -3.00%
- 1M
- 13.52%
- YTD
- 32.34%
- 6M
- 15.25%
- 1Y
- 73.27%
- 3Y*
- 48.31%
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
SOXX
- 1D
- 1.76%
- 1M
- 33.25%
- YTD
- 104.57%
- 6M
- 99.43%
- 1Y
- 190.05%
- 3Y*
- 57.39%
- 5Y*
- 34.50%
- 10Y*
- 35.79%
IBLC vs. SOXX - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
IBLC iShares Blockchain and Tech ETF | 32.34% | 27.05% | 18.58% | 201.47% | -57.76% |
SOXX iShares Semiconductor ETF | 104.57% | 40.74% | 12.92% | 67.12% | -11.45% |
Correlation
The correlation between IBLC and SOXX is 0.57, which is moderate. They share some common price drivers but move independently often enough to provide real diversification benefit when combined.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.57 |
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period | 0.54 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Apr 28, 2022 | 0.59 |
The correlation between IBLC and SOXX has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.54 to 0.59 - a consistent structural relationship.
IBLC vs. SOXX - Sectors Allocation Comparison
Sectors
IBLC
SOXX
Financial Services
-
Technology
Communication Services
-
Utilities
-
Consumer Cyclical
-
Basic Materials
-
-
Consumer Defensive
-
-
Energy
-
-
Healthcare
-
-
Industrials
-
-
Real Estate
-
-
Financial Services
IBLC
SOXX
-
Technology
IBLC
SOXX
Communication Services
IBLC
SOXX
-
Utilities
IBLC
SOXX
-
Consumer Cyclical
IBLC
SOXX
-
Basic Materials
IBLC
-
SOXX
-
Consumer Defensive
IBLC
-
SOXX
-
Energy
IBLC
-
SOXX
-
Healthcare
IBLC
-
SOXX
-
Industrials
IBLC
-
SOXX
-
Real Estate
IBLC
-
SOXX
-
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
IBLC vs. SOXX — Risk / Return Rank
IBLC
SOXX
IBLC vs. SOXX - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for iShares Blockchain and Tech ETF (IBLC) and iShares Semiconductor ETF (SOXX). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
| IBLC | SOXX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | -4.26 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | -3.44 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.23 | 1.74 | -0.52 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 1.64 | 12.13 | -10.49 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 3.26 | 46.43 | -43.18 |
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month. | |||
Loading charts...
Sharpe Ratios by Period
| IBLC | SOXX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe Ratio (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 1.34 | 5.61 | -4.26 |
Sharpe Ratio (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | — | 0.96 | — |
Sharpe Ratio (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | — | 1.07 | — |
Sharpe Ratio (All Time)Calculated using the full available price history | 0.40 | 0.45 | -0.05 |
Drawdowns
IBLC vs. SOXX - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum IBLC drawdown since its inception was -62.54%, smaller than the maximum SOXX drawdown of -70.21%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for IBLC and SOXX.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| IBLC | SOXX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -62.54% | -70.21% | +7.67% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -44.94% | -15.77% | -29.17% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -51.68% | -41.36% | -10.32% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | — | -45.75% | — |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | — | -45.75% | — |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -12.99% | 0.00% | -12.99% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -25.89% | -19.97% | -5.92% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 22.56% | 4.11% | +18.45% |
Volatility
IBLC vs. SOXX - Volatility Comparison
iShares Blockchain and Tech ETF (IBLC) and iShares Semiconductor ETF (SOXX) have volatilities of 14.67% and 14.03%, respectively, indicating that both stocks experience similar levels of price fluctuations. This suggests that the risk associated with both stocks, as measured by volatility, is nearly the same. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| IBLC | SOXX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 14.67% | 14.03% | +0.64% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 40.76% | 27.35% | +13.41% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 54.94% | 34.18% | +20.76% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 64.49% | 36.11% | +28.38% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 64.49% | 33.43% | +31.06% |
IBLC vs. SOXX - Expense Ratio Comparison
IBLC has a 0.47% expense ratio, which is higher than SOXX's 0.34% expense ratio.
Dividends
IBLC vs. SOXX - Dividend Comparison
IBLC's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 4.77%, more than SOXX's 0.27% yield.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
IBLC iShares Blockchain and Tech ETF | 4.77% | 6.31% | 1.60% | 1.79% | 0.84% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
SOXX iShares Semiconductor ETF | 0.27% | 0.57% | 0.67% | 0.78% | 1.26% | 0.64% | 0.81% | 1.23% | 1.37% | 0.90% | 1.08% | 1.29% |
Frequently Asked Questions
IBLC and SOXX have a correlation of 0.57, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
IBLC has higher volatility (14.67%) compared to SOXX (14.03%). In terms of maximum drawdown, IBLC dropped -62.54% vs SOXX's -70.21%.
On 3-year performance, SOXX leads with 57.39% vs 48.31% for IBLC. On fees, SOXX is cheaper at 0.34% per year. On volatility, SOXX has been the lower-risk option at 14.03%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
Over the 3-year period, SOXX has performed better with a 57.39% return vs 48.31%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.
SOXX is cheaper with a 0.34% expense ratio, compared with 0.47% for IBLC.
IBLC has the higher dividend yield at 4.77%, compared with 0.27% for SOXX.
IBLC is categorized as Cryptocurrency, while SOXX is Semiconductors. IBLC tracks ICE FactSet Global Blockchain Technologies Index, while SOXX tracks NYSE Semiconductor Index. Their fees differ too: 0.47% for IBLC and 0.34% for SOXX.
SOXX currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (5.61 vs 1.34), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.
Find the right allocation for IBLC and SOXX
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer