PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
IBLC vs. MSBT
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

IBLC vs. MSBT - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in iShares Blockchain and Tech ETF (IBLC) and Morgan Stanley Bitcoin Trust (MSBT). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period


IBLC

1D
-3.00%
1M
13.52%
YTD
32.34%
6M
15.25%
1Y
73.27%
3Y*
48.31%
5Y*
10Y*

MSBT

1D
-6.05%
1M
-14.36%
YTD
6M
1Y
3Y*
5Y*
10Y*
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

IBLC vs. MSBT - Yearly Performance Comparison


Correlation

The correlation between IBLC and MSBT is 0.64, which is moderate. They share some common price drivers but move independently often enough to provide real diversification benefit when combined.


Correlation
Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Apr 9, 2026

0.64

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

IBLC vs. MSBT — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

IBLC
IBLC Risk / Return Rank: 3333
Overall Rank
IBLC Sharpe Ratio Rank: 3737
Sharpe Ratio Rank
IBLC Sortino Ratio Rank: 3636
Sortino Ratio Rank
IBLC Omega Ratio Rank: 3333
Omega Ratio Rank
IBLC Calmar Ratio Rank: 3333
Calmar Ratio Rank
IBLC Martin Ratio Rank: 2424
Martin Ratio Rank

MSBT
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

IBLC vs. MSBT - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for iShares Blockchain and Tech ETF (IBLC) and Morgan Stanley Bitcoin Trust (MSBT). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


IBLCMSBTDifference

Sharpe ratio

Return per unit of total volatility

1.34

Sortino ratio

Return per unit of downside risk

1.92

Omega ratio

Gain probability vs. loss probability

1.23

Calmar ratio

Return relative to maximum drawdown

1.64

Martin ratio

Return relative to average drawdown

3.26

IBLC vs. MSBT - Sharpe Ratio Comparison


Loading charts...

Sharpe Ratios by Period


IBLCMSBTDifference

Sharpe Ratio (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

1.34

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

0.40

-1.02

+1.42

Drawdowns

IBLC vs. MSBT - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum IBLC drawdown since its inception was -62.54%, which is greater than MSBT's maximum drawdown of -18.03%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for IBLC and MSBT.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


IBLCMSBTDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-62.54%

-18.03%

-44.51%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-44.94%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-51.68%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-12.99%

-18.03%

+5.04%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-25.89%

-3.48%

-22.41%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

22.56%

Volatility

IBLC vs. MSBT - Volatility Comparison


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


IBLCMSBTDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

14.67%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

40.76%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

54.94%

32.70%

+22.24%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

64.49%

32.70%

+31.79%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

64.49%

32.70%

+31.79%

IBLC vs. MSBT - Expense Ratio Comparison

IBLC has a 0.47% expense ratio, which is higher than MSBT's 0.14% expense ratio.


Dividends

IBLC vs. MSBT - Dividend Comparison

IBLC's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 4.77%, while MSBT has not paid dividends to shareholders.


PositionTTM2025202420232022
IBLC
iShares Blockchain and Tech ETF
4.77%6.31%1.60%1.79%0.84%
MSBT
Morgan Stanley Bitcoin Trust
0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%

Frequently Asked Questions


IBLC and MSBT have a correlation of 0.64, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

On fees, MSBT is cheaper at 0.14% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

MSBT is cheaper with a 0.14% expense ratio, compared with 0.47% for IBLC.

IBLC has the higher dividend yield at 4.77%, compared with 0.00% for MSBT.

IBLC tracks ICE FactSet Global Blockchain Technologies Index, while MSBT tracks CoinDesk Bitcoin Benchmark 4PM NY Settlement Rate. They also come from different issuers: iShares and Morgan Stanley. Their fees differ too: 0.47% for IBLC and 0.14% for MSBT.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for IBLC and MSBT

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer