IBLC vs. MSBT
IBLC (iShares Blockchain and Tech ETF) and MSBT (Morgan Stanley Bitcoin Trust) are both Cryptocurrency funds - IBLC tracks the ICE FactSet Global Blockchain Technologies Index while MSBT tracks the CoinDesk Bitcoin Benchmark 4PM NY Settlement Rate. Both are passively managed. A 0.64 correlation means they provide meaningful diversification when combined. IBLC charges 0.47%/yr vs 0.14%/yr for MSBT.
Performance
IBLC vs. MSBT - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
IBLC
- 1D
- -3.00%
- 1M
- 13.52%
- YTD
- 32.34%
- 6M
- 15.25%
- 1Y
- 73.27%
- 3Y*
- 48.31%
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
MSBT
- 1D
- -6.05%
- 1M
- -14.36%
- YTD
- —
- 6M
- —
- 1Y
- —
- 3Y*
- —
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
IBLC vs. MSBT - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | |
|---|---|
IBLC iShares Blockchain and Tech ETF | 36.79% |
MSBT Morgan Stanley Bitcoin Trust | -5.86% |
Correlation
The correlation between IBLC and MSBT is 0.64, which is moderate. They share some common price drivers but move independently often enough to provide real diversification benefit when combined.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Apr 9, 2026 | 0.64 |
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
IBLC vs. MSBT — Risk / Return Rank
IBLC
MSBT
IBLC vs. MSBT - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for iShares Blockchain and Tech ETF (IBLC) and Morgan Stanley Bitcoin Trust (MSBT). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
| IBLC | MSBT | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | 1.34 | — | — |
Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | 1.92 | — | — |
Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.23 | — | — |
Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 1.64 | — | — |
Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 3.26 | — | — |
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month. | |||
Loading charts...
Sharpe Ratios by Period
| IBLC | MSBT | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe Ratio (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 1.34 | — | — |
Sharpe Ratio (All Time)Calculated using the full available price history | 0.40 | -1.02 | +1.42 |
Drawdowns
IBLC vs. MSBT - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum IBLC drawdown since its inception was -62.54%, which is greater than MSBT's maximum drawdown of -18.03%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for IBLC and MSBT.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| IBLC | MSBT | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -62.54% | -18.03% | -44.51% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -44.94% | — | — |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -51.68% | — | — |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -12.99% | -18.03% | +5.04% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -25.89% | -3.48% | -22.41% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 22.56% | — | — |
Volatility
IBLC vs. MSBT - Volatility Comparison
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| IBLC | MSBT | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 14.67% | — | — |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 40.76% | — | — |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 54.94% | 32.70% | +22.24% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 64.49% | 32.70% | +31.79% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 64.49% | 32.70% | +31.79% |
IBLC vs. MSBT - Expense Ratio Comparison
IBLC has a 0.47% expense ratio, which is higher than MSBT's 0.14% expense ratio.
Dividends
IBLC vs. MSBT - Dividend Comparison
IBLC's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 4.77%, while MSBT has not paid dividends to shareholders.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
IBLC iShares Blockchain and Tech ETF | 4.77% | 6.31% | 1.60% | 1.79% | 0.84% |
MSBT Morgan Stanley Bitcoin Trust | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
Frequently Asked Questions
IBLC and MSBT have a correlation of 0.64, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
On fees, MSBT is cheaper at 0.14% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
MSBT is cheaper with a 0.14% expense ratio, compared with 0.47% for IBLC.
IBLC has the higher dividend yield at 4.77%, compared with 0.00% for MSBT.
IBLC tracks ICE FactSet Global Blockchain Technologies Index, while MSBT tracks CoinDesk Bitcoin Benchmark 4PM NY Settlement Rate. They also come from different issuers: iShares and Morgan Stanley. Their fees differ too: 0.47% for IBLC and 0.14% for MSBT.
Find the right allocation for IBLC and MSBT
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer