PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
IBLC vs. CBUT.DE
Performance
Return for Risk
Dividends
Drawdowns
Volatility

Performance

IBLC vs. CBUT.DE - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in iShares Blockchain and Tech ETF (IBLC) and iShares Blockchain Technology UCITS ETF USD (Acc) (CBUT.DE). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading graphics...

IBLC vs. CBUT.DE - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)2025202420232022
IBLC
iShares Blockchain and Tech ETF
-10.68%27.05%18.58%201.47%-27.60%
CBUT.DE
iShares Blockchain Technology UCITS ETF USD (Acc)
-16.70%27.76%6.00%246.00%-30.38%
Different Trading Currencies

IBLC is traded in USD, while CBUT.DE is traded in EUR. To make them comparable, the CBUT.DE values have been converted to USD using the latest available exchange rates.

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, IBLC achieves a -10.68% return, which is significantly higher than CBUT.DE's -16.70% return.


IBLC

1D
6.56%
1M
-5.99%
YTD
-10.68%
6M
-29.99%
1Y
57.18%
3Y*
34.97%
5Y*
10Y*

CBUT.DE

1D
-0.75%
1M
-9.56%
YTD
-16.70%
6M
-31.83%
1Y
51.56%
3Y*
33.28%
5Y*
10Y*
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


IBLC vs. CBUT.DE - Expense Ratio Comparison

IBLC has a 0.47% expense ratio, which is lower than CBUT.DE's 0.50% expense ratio.


Return for Risk

IBLC vs. CBUT.DE — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

IBLC
IBLC Risk / Return Rank: 5151
Overall Rank
IBLC Sharpe Ratio Rank: 5858
Sharpe Ratio Rank
IBLC Sortino Ratio Rank: 6767
Sortino Ratio Rank
IBLC Omega Ratio Rank: 5252
Omega Ratio Rank
IBLC Calmar Ratio Rank: 4949
Calmar Ratio Rank
IBLC Martin Ratio Rank: 3131
Martin Ratio Rank

CBUT.DE
CBUT.DE Risk / Return Rank: 3838
Overall Rank
CBUT.DE Sharpe Ratio Rank: 4242
Sharpe Ratio Rank
CBUT.DE Sortino Ratio Rank: 5050
Sortino Ratio Rank
CBUT.DE Omega Ratio Rank: 3939
Omega Ratio Rank
CBUT.DE Calmar Ratio Rank: 3535
Calmar Ratio Rank
CBUT.DE Martin Ratio Rank: 2525
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

IBLC vs. CBUT.DE - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for iShares Blockchain and Tech ETF (IBLC) and iShares Blockchain Technology UCITS ETF USD (Acc) (CBUT.DE). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


IBLCCBUT.DEDifference

Sharpe ratio

Return per unit of total volatility

0.99

0.95

+0.04

Sortino ratio

Return per unit of downside risk

1.62

1.53

+0.10

Omega ratio

Gain probability vs. loss probability

1.19

1.18

+0.01

Calmar ratio

Return relative to maximum drawdown

1.18

1.10

+0.08

Martin ratio

Return relative to average drawdown

2.64

2.36

+0.28

IBLC vs. CBUT.DE - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current IBLC Sharpe Ratio is 0.99, which is comparable to the CBUT.DE Sharpe Ratio of 0.95. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of IBLC and CBUT.DE, offering insights into how both investments have performed under varying market conditions. These values are calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months.


Loading graphics...

Sharpe Ratios by Period


IBLCCBUT.DEDifference

Sharpe Ratio (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.99

0.95

+0.04

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

0.23

0.54

-0.31

Correlation

The correlation between IBLC and CBUT.DE is 0.67, which is considered to be moderate. This suggests that the two assets have some degree of positive relationship in their price movements. Moderate correlation can be acceptable for portfolio diversification, offering a balance between risk and potential returns.


Dividends

IBLC vs. CBUT.DE - Dividend Comparison

IBLC's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 7.06%, while CBUT.DE has not paid dividends to shareholders.


TTM2025202420232022
IBLC
iShares Blockchain and Tech ETF
7.06%6.31%1.60%1.79%0.84%
CBUT.DE
iShares Blockchain Technology UCITS ETF USD (Acc)
0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%

Drawdowns

IBLC vs. CBUT.DE - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum IBLC drawdown since its inception was -62.54%, which is greater than CBUT.DE's maximum drawdown of -52.30%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for IBLC and CBUT.DE.


Loading graphics...

Drawdown Indicators


IBLCCBUT.DEDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-62.54%

-53.95%

-8.59%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-44.94%

-43.09%

-1.85%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-41.28%

-43.09%

+1.81%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-26.00%

-19.79%

-6.21%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

20.15%

20.46%

-0.31%

Volatility

IBLC vs. CBUT.DE - Volatility Comparison

iShares Blockchain and Tech ETF (IBLC) has a higher volatility of 18.51% compared to iShares Blockchain Technology UCITS ETF USD (Acc) (CBUT.DE) at 14.20%. This indicates that IBLC's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than CBUT.DE based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading graphics...

Volatility by Period


IBLCCBUT.DEDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

18.51%

14.20%

+4.31%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

44.23%

40.37%

+3.86%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

58.34%

54.15%

+4.19%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

65.16%

61.66%

+3.50%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

65.16%

61.66%

+3.50%