IBLC vs. BKCH

Last updated Jun 4, 2026

IBLC (iShares Blockchain and Tech ETF) and BKCH (Global X Blockchain ETF) are both exchange-traded funds - IBLC is a Cryptocurrency fund tracking the ICE FactSet Global Blockchain Technologies Index, while BKCH is a Technology Equities fund actively managed by Global X. IBLC is passively managed, while BKCH is actively managed. Over the past 3 years, IBLC returned 48.31%/yr vs 56.01%/yr for BKCH. With a 0.98 correlation, they move nearly in lockstep. IBLC charges 0.47%/yr vs 0.50%/yr for BKCH.

Performance

IBLC vs. BKCH - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in iShares Blockchain and Tech ETF (IBLC) and Global X Blockchain ETF (BKCH). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, IBLC achieves a 32.34% return, which is significantly lower than BKCH's 38.46% return.

IBLC

• 1D: -3.00%
• 1M: 13.52%
• YTD: 32.34%
• 6M: 15.25%
• 1Y: 73.27%
• 3Y*: 48.31%
• 5Y*: —
• 10Y*: —

BKCH

• 1D: -3.34%
• 1M: 13.82%
• YTD: 38.46%
• 6M: 15.41%
• 1Y: 99.88%
• 3Y*: 56.01%
• 5Y*: —
• 10Y*: —

*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

IBLC vs. BKCH - Yearly Performance Comparison

	2026 (YTD)	2025	2024	2023	2022
IBLC iShares Blockchain and Tech ETF	32.34%	27.05%	18.58%	201.47%	-57.76%
BKCH Global X Blockchain ETF	38.46%	27.14%	18.81%	267.06%	-72.15%

Correlation

The correlation between IBLC and BKCH is 0.98 - these two move nearly in lockstep. At this level, holding both provides almost no diversification benefit. If you already own one, adding the other does little to reduce portfolio risk.

	Correlation
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	0.98
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period	0.98
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Apr 28, 2022	0.98

The correlation between IBLC and BKCH has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.98 to 0.98 - a consistent structural relationship.

Return for Risk

IBLC vs. BKCH — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

IBLC

IBLC Risk / Return Rank: 33
IBLC Sharpe Ratio Rank: 37
IBLC Sortino Ratio Rank: 36
IBLC Omega Ratio Rank: 33
IBLC Calmar Ratio Rank: 33
IBLC Martin Ratio Rank: 24

BKCH

BKCH Risk / Return Rank: 35
BKCH Sharpe Ratio Rank: 40
BKCH Sortino Ratio Rank: 39
BKCH Omega Ratio Rank: 35
BKCH Calmar Ratio Rank: 36
BKCH Martin Ratio Rank: 25

The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

IBLC vs. BKCH - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for iShares Blockchain and Tech ETF (IBLC) and Global X Blockchain ETF (BKCH). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

	IBLC	BKCH	Difference
Sharpe ratio Return per unit of total volatility	1.34	1.44	-0.10
Sortino ratio Return per unit of downside risk	1.92	2.04	-0.12
Omega ratio Gain probability vs. loss probability	1.23	1.24	-0.01
Calmar ratio Return relative to maximum drawdown	1.64	1.78	-0.15
Martin ratio Return relative to average drawdown	3.26	3.31	-0.06
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month.

IBLC vs. BKCH - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current IBLC Sharpe Ratio is 1.34, which is comparable to the BKCH Sharpe Ratio of 1.44. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of IBLC and BKCH, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.

Sharpe Ratios by Period

	IBLC	BKCH	Difference
Sharpe Ratio (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	1.34	1.44	-0.10
Sharpe Ratio (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history	0.40	0.03	+0.36

Drawdowns

IBLC vs. BKCH - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum IBLC drawdown since its inception was -62.54%, smaller than the maximum BKCH drawdown of -91.80%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for IBLC and BKCH.

Drawdown Indicators

	IBLC	BKCH	Difference
Max Drawdown Largest peak-to-trough decline	-62.54%	-91.80%	+29.26%
Max Drawdown (1Y) Largest decline over 1 year	-44.94%	-56.28%	+11.34%
Max Drawdown (3Y) Largest decline over 3 years	-51.68%	-57.99%	+6.31%
Current Drawdown Current decline from peak	-12.99%	-33.62%	+20.63%
Average Drawdown Average peak-to-trough decline	-25.89%	-62.13%	+36.24%
Ulcer Index Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks	22.56%	30.25%	-7.69%

Volatility

IBLC vs. BKCH - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for iShares Blockchain and Tech ETF (IBLC) is 14.67%, while Global X Blockchain ETF (BKCH) has a volatility of 18.09%. This indicates that IBLC experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than BKCH based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.

Volatility by Period

	IBLC	BKCH	Difference
Volatility (1M) Calculated over the trailing 1-month period	14.67%	18.09%	-3.42%
Volatility (6M) Calculated over the trailing 6-month period	40.76%	51.40%	-10.64%
Volatility (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	54.94%	69.90%	-14.96%
Volatility (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized	64.49%	75.43%	-10.94%
Volatility (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized	64.49%	75.43%	-10.94%

IBLC vs. BKCH - Expense Ratio Comparison

IBLC has a 0.47% expense ratio, which is lower than BKCH's 0.50% expense ratio.

Dividends

IBLC vs. BKCH - Dividend Comparison

IBLC's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 4.77%, more than BKCH's 1.44% yield.

Position	TTM	2025	2024	2023	2022	2021
BKCH Global X Blockchain ETF	1.44%	2.00%	7.61%	2.33%	1.29%	4.28%
IBLC iShares Blockchain and Tech ETF	4.77%	6.31%	1.60%	1.79%	0.84%	0.00%

Frequently Asked Questions

Can I hold both IBLC and BKCH in my portfolio?

With a correlation of 0.98, IBLC and BKCH move almost identically. Holding both adds very little diversification - you're essentially doubling your position in the same market segment. Choosing one is usually more capital-efficient.

Which is riskier, IBLC or BKCH?

BKCH has higher volatility (18.09%) compared to IBLC (14.67%). In terms of maximum drawdown, IBLC dropped -62.54% vs BKCH's -91.80%.

Which ETF is better, IBLC or BKCH?

On 3-year performance, BKCH leads with 56.01% vs 48.31% for IBLC. On fees, IBLC is cheaper at 0.47% per year. On volatility, IBLC has been the lower-risk option at 14.67%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Which ETF has performed better, IBLC or BKCH?

Over the 3-year period, BKCH has performed better with a 56.01% return vs 48.31%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.

Which ETF is cheaper, IBLC or BKCH?

IBLC is cheaper with a 0.47% expense ratio, compared with 0.50% for BKCH.

Which ETF pays a higher dividend yield, IBLC or BKCH?

IBLC has the higher dividend yield at 4.77%, compared with 1.44% for BKCH.

What is the main difference between IBLC and BKCH?

IBLC is categorized as Cryptocurrency, while BKCH is Technology Equities. They also come from different issuers: iShares and Global X. Their fees differ too: 0.47% for IBLC and 0.50% for BKCH.

Which has better risk-adjusted returns?

BKCH currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (1.44 vs 1.34), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.