IBKR vs. WMT
IBKR (Interactive Brokers Group, Inc.) and WMT (Walmart Inc.) are both stocks. IBKR operates in Capital Markets (Financial Services), while WMT operates in Discount Stores (Consumer Defensive). Over the past 10 years, IBKR returned 26.54%/yr vs 19.77%/yr for WMT. At a 0.20 correlation, their price movements are largely independent.
Performance
IBKR vs. WMT - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, IBKR achieves a 41.50% return, which is significantly higher than WMT's 9.07% return. Over the past 10 years, IBKR has outperformed WMT with an annualized return of 26.54%, while WMT has yielded a comparatively lower 19.77% annualized return.
IBKR
- 1D
- 2.23%
- 1M
- 6.79%
- YTD
- 41.50%
- 6M
- 41.85%
- 1Y
- 78.02%
- 3Y*
- 67.33%
- 5Y*
- 41.64%
- 10Y*
- 26.54%
WMT
- 1D
- 0.45%
- 1M
- -7.93%
- YTD
- 9.07%
- 6M
- 4.13%
- 1Y
- 28.71%
- 3Y*
- 34.18%
- 5Y*
- 22.42%
- 10Y*
- 19.77%
IBKR vs. WMT - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
IBKR Interactive Brokers Group, Inc. | 41.50% | 46.37% | 114.43% | 15.14% | -8.35% | 31.12% | 31.71% | -14.01% | -7.13% | 63.75% |
WMT Walmart Inc. | 9.07% | 24.49% | 73.99% | 12.88% | -0.46% | 1.97% | 23.32% | 30.16% | -3.43% | 46.56% |
Correlation
The correlation between IBKR and WMT is -0.09, meaning there is essentially no relationship between their price movements. Each responds to its own set of market drivers, making them strong candidates for combining in a diversified portfolio.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | -0.09 |
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period | 0.06 |
Correlation (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.11 |
Correlation (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | 0.14 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since May 4, 2007 | 0.20 |
The correlation between IBKR and WMT shifts across timeframes, from -0.09 (1 year) to 0.20 (all time), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.
Fundamentals
IBKR:
$40.72B
WMT:
$968.20B
IBKR:
$3.76
WMT:
$2.88
IBKR:
24.18
WMT:
42.04
IBKR:
0.83
WMT:
2.75
IBKR:
4.66
WMT:
1.34
IBKR:
1.92
WMT:
10.26
IBKR:
$8.69B
WMT:
$725.31B
IBKR:
$7.75B
WMT:
$181.16B
IBKR:
$7.07B
WMT:
$44.32B
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
IBKR vs. WMT — Risk / Return Rank
IBKR
WMT
IBKR vs. WMT - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Interactive Brokers Group, Inc. (IBKR) and Walmart Inc. (WMT). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.
| IBKR | WMT | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | +0.86 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | +0.88 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.33 | 1.23 | +0.09 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 4.20 | 1.83 | +2.36 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 10.65 | 5.82 | +4.83 |
Loading charts...
Drawdowns
IBKR vs. WMT - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum IBKR drawdown since its inception was -63.66%, smaller than the maximum WMT drawdown of -77.14%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for IBKR and WMT.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| IBKR | WMT | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -63.66% | -77.14% | +13.48% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -18.70% | -15.75% | -2.95% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -38.66% | -21.93% | -16.73% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -38.66% | -25.74% | -12.92% |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | -55.09% | -25.74% | -29.35% |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | 0.00% | -9.81% | +9.81% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -24.85% | -14.63% | -10.22% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 7.35% | 4.94% | +2.41% |
Volatility
IBKR vs. WMT - Volatility Comparison
Interactive Brokers Group, Inc. (IBKR) has a higher volatility of 11.31% compared to Walmart Inc. (WMT) at 9.86%. This indicates that IBKR's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than WMT based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| IBKR | WMT | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 11.31% | 9.86% | +1.45% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 27.82% | 18.49% | +9.33% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 37.67% | 23.67% | +14.00% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 34.50% | 21.68% | +12.82% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 33.37% | 21.73% | +11.64% |
Dividends
IBKR vs. WMT - Dividend Comparison
IBKR's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 0.36%, less than WMT's 0.80% yield.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
IBKR Interactive Brokers Group, Inc. | 0.36% | 0.47% | 0.48% | 0.48% | 0.55% | 0.50% | 0.66% | 0.86% | 0.73% | 0.68% | 1.10% | 0.92% |
WMT Walmart Inc. | 0.80% | 0.84% | 0.92% | 1.45% | 1.58% | 1.52% | 1.50% | 1.78% | 2.23% | 2.07% | 2.89% | 3.20% |
Financials
IBKR vs. WMT - Financials Comparison
This section allows you to compare key financial metrics between Interactive Brokers Group, Inc. and Walmart Inc.. You can select fields from income statements, balance sheets, and cash flow statements to easily visualize and compare the financial health of both companies.
Total Revenue: Total amount of money received from sales and other business activities
Frequently Asked Questions
IBKR and WMT have a correlation of -0.09, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
IBKR has higher volatility (11.31%) compared to WMT (9.86%). In terms of maximum drawdown, IBKR dropped -63.66% vs WMT's -77.14%.
IBKR currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (2.08 vs 1.22), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.
Find the right allocation for IBKR and WMT
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer