PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
IBKR vs. VEEV
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends
Financials

Performance

IBKR vs. VEEV - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Interactive Brokers Group, Inc. (IBKR) and Veeva Systems Inc. (VEEV). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, IBKR achieves a 41.50% return, which is significantly higher than VEEV's -28.53% return. Over the past 10 years, IBKR has outperformed VEEV with an annualized return of 26.54%, while VEEV has yielded a comparatively lower 16.73% annualized return.


IBKR

1D
2.23%
1M
6.79%
YTD
41.50%
6M
41.85%
1Y
78.02%
3Y*
67.33%
5Y*
41.64%
10Y*
26.54%

VEEV

1D
-1.24%
1M
2.45%
YTD
-28.53%
6M
-28.54%
1Y
-43.46%
3Y*
-5.80%
5Y*
-11.82%
10Y*
16.73%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

IBKR vs. VEEV - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)202520242023202220212020201920182017
IBKR
Interactive Brokers Group, Inc.
41.50%46.37%114.43%15.14%-8.35%31.12%31.71%-14.01%-7.13%63.75%
VEEV
Veeva Systems Inc.
-28.53%6.17%9.21%19.30%-36.83%-6.16%93.55%57.48%61.58%35.82%

Correlation

The correlation between IBKR and VEEV is 0.24, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.24

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.22

Correlation (5Y)
Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.29

Correlation (10Y)
Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.29

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Oct 16, 2013

0.30

Fundamentals

Market Cap

IBKR:

$40.72B

VEEV:

$26.48B

EPS

IBKR:

$3.76

VEEV:

$5.63

PE Ratio

IBKR:

24.18

VEEV:

28.36

PEG Ratio

IBKR:

0.83

VEEV:

1.47

PS Ratio

IBKR:

4.66

VEEV:

8.04

PB Ratio

IBKR:

1.92

VEEV:

3.63

Total Revenue (TTM)

IBKR:

$8.69B

VEEV:

$3.32B

Gross Profit (TTM)

IBKR:

$7.75B

VEEV:

$2.49B

EBITDA (TTM)

IBKR:

$7.07B

VEEV:

$1.00B

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

IBKR vs. VEEV — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

IBKR
IBKR Risk / Return Rank: 8888
Overall Rank
IBKR Sharpe Ratio Rank: 9090
Sharpe Ratio Rank
IBKR Sortino Ratio Rank: 8686
Sortino Ratio Rank
IBKR Omega Ratio Rank: 8484
Omega Ratio Rank
IBKR Calmar Ratio Rank: 9090
Calmar Ratio Rank
IBKR Martin Ratio Rank: 8989
Martin Ratio Rank

VEEV
VEEV Risk / Return Rank: 55
Overall Rank
VEEV Sharpe Ratio Rank: 22
Sharpe Ratio Rank
VEEV Sortino Ratio Rank: 33
Sortino Ratio Rank
VEEV Omega Ratio Rank: 44
Omega Ratio Rank
VEEV Calmar Ratio Rank: 99
Calmar Ratio Rank
VEEV Martin Ratio Rank: 66
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

IBKR vs. VEEV - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Interactive Brokers Group, Inc. (IBKR) and Veeva Systems Inc. (VEEV). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.


IBKRVEEVDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

+3.30

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

+4.55

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.33

0.77

+0.55

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

4.20

-0.86

+5.06

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

10.65

-1.51

+12.17

IBKR vs. VEEV - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current IBKR Sharpe Ratio is 2.08, which is higher than the VEEV Sharpe Ratio of -1.22. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of IBKR and VEEV, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Drawdowns

IBKR vs. VEEV - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum IBKR drawdown since its inception was -63.66%, roughly equal to the maximum VEEV drawdown of -61.35%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for IBKR and VEEV.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


IBKRVEEVDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-63.66%

-61.35%

-2.31%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-18.70%

-50.55%

+31.85%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-38.66%

-50.55%

+11.89%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-38.66%

-55.69%

+17.03%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-55.09%

-55.69%

+0.60%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

0.00%

-53.21%

+53.21%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-24.85%

-26.08%

+1.23%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

7.35%

28.76%

-21.41%

Volatility

IBKR vs. VEEV - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for Interactive Brokers Group, Inc. (IBKR) is 11.31%, while Veeva Systems Inc. (VEEV) has a volatility of 14.08%. This indicates that IBKR experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than VEEV based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


IBKRVEEVDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

11.31%

14.08%

-2.77%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

27.82%

29.27%

-1.45%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

37.67%

35.87%

+1.80%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

34.50%

37.98%

-3.48%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

33.37%

38.23%

-4.86%

Dividends

IBKR vs. VEEV - Dividend Comparison

IBKR's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 0.36%, while VEEV has not paid dividends to shareholders.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
IBKR
Interactive Brokers Group, Inc.
0.36%0.47%0.48%0.48%0.55%0.50%0.66%0.86%0.73%0.68%1.10%0.92%
VEEV
Veeva Systems Inc.
0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%

Financials

IBKR vs. VEEV - Financials Comparison

This section allows you to compare key financial metrics between Interactive Brokers Group, Inc. and Veeva Systems Inc.. You can select fields from income statements, balance sheets, and cash flow statements to easily visualize and compare the financial health of both companies.


Quarterly
Annual

Total Revenue: Total amount of money received from sales and other business activities


500.00M1.00B1.50B2.00B2.50B20222023202420252026
765.00M
882.95M
(IBKR) Total Revenue
(VEEV) Total Revenue
Values in USD except per share items

Frequently Asked Questions


IBKR and VEEV have a correlation of 0.24, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

VEEV has higher volatility (14.08%) compared to IBKR (11.31%). In terms of maximum drawdown, IBKR dropped -63.66% vs VEEV's -61.35%.

IBKR currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (2.08 vs -1.22), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for IBKR and VEEV

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer