PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
IBKR vs. AEP.L
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends
Financials

Performance

IBKR vs. AEP.L - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Interactive Brokers Group, Inc. (IBKR) and Anglo-Eastern Plantations plc (AEP.L). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Different Trading Currencies

IBKR is traded in USD, while AEP.L is traded in GBp. To make them comparable, the AEP.L values have been converted to USD using the latest available exchange rates.

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, IBKR achieves a 34.52% return, which is significantly higher than AEP.L's 10.98% return. Over the past 10 years, IBKR has outperformed AEP.L with an annualized return of 25.20%, while AEP.L has yielded a comparatively lower 13.90% annualized return.


IBKR

1D
-1.17%
1M
2.37%
YTD
34.52%
6M
31.96%
1Y
69.50%
3Y*
63.82%
5Y*
40.19%
10Y*
25.20%

AEP.L

1D
1.91%
1M
-24.33%
YTD
10.98%
6M
15.48%
1Y
95.38%
3Y*
30.92%
5Y*
20.77%
10Y*
13.90%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

IBKR vs. AEP.L - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)202520242023202220212020201920182017
IBKR
Interactive Brokers Group, Inc.
34.52%46.37%114.43%15.14%-8.35%31.12%31.71%-14.01%-7.13%63.75%
AEP.L
Anglo-Eastern Plantations plc
11.01%140.93%-2.29%-8.24%-0.30%22.51%4.76%5.61%-30.04%25.31%

Correlation

The correlation between IBKR and AEP.L is 0.17, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.17

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.10

Correlation (5Y)
Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.10

Correlation (10Y)
Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.06

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Jul 6, 2007

0.06

The correlation between IBKR and AEP.L shifts across timeframes, from 0.06 (10 years) to 0.17 (1 year), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.

Fundamentals

Market Cap

IBKR:

$38.71B

AEP.L:

£594.92M

EPS

IBKR:

$3.76

AEP.L:

£4.05

PE Ratio

IBKR:

22.99

AEP.L:

3.78

PEG Ratio

IBKR:

0.79

AEP.L:

0.37

PS Ratio

IBKR:

4.43

AEP.L:

0.72

PB Ratio

IBKR:

1.82

AEP.L:

1.02

Total Revenue (TTM)

IBKR:

$8.69B

AEP.L:

£838.60M

Gross Profit (TTM)

IBKR:

$7.75B

AEP.L:

£214.57M

EBITDA (TTM)

IBKR:

$7.07B

AEP.L:

£230.87M

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

IBKR vs. AEP.L — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

IBKR
IBKR Risk / Return Rank: 8686
Overall Rank
IBKR Sharpe Ratio Rank: 8888
Sharpe Ratio Rank
IBKR Sortino Ratio Rank: 8484
Sortino Ratio Rank
IBKR Omega Ratio Rank: 8282
Omega Ratio Rank
IBKR Calmar Ratio Rank: 8888
Calmar Ratio Rank
IBKR Martin Ratio Rank: 8888
Martin Ratio Rank

AEP.L
AEP.L Risk / Return Rank: 8989
Overall Rank
AEP.L Sharpe Ratio Rank: 9191
Sharpe Ratio Rank
AEP.L Sortino Ratio Rank: 8585
Sortino Ratio Rank
AEP.L Omega Ratio Rank: 9191
Omega Ratio Rank
AEP.L Calmar Ratio Rank: 8383
Calmar Ratio Rank
AEP.L Martin Ratio Rank: 9393
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

IBKR vs. AEP.L - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Interactive Brokers Group, Inc. (IBKR) and Anglo-Eastern Plantations plc (AEP.L). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


IBKRAEP.LDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

-0.22

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

-0.06

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.30

1.40

-0.10

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

3.74

2.74

+0.99

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

9.49

14.17

-4.68

IBKR vs. AEP.L - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current IBKR Sharpe Ratio is 1.87, which is comparable to the AEP.L Sharpe Ratio of 2.09. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of IBKR and AEP.L, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Sharpe Ratios by Period


IBKRAEP.LDifference

Sharpe Ratio (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

1.87

2.09

-0.22

Sharpe Ratio (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

1.17

0.60

+0.57

Sharpe Ratio (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.76

0.39

+0.37

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

0.43

0.15

+0.28

Drawdowns

IBKR vs. AEP.L - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum IBKR drawdown since its inception was -63.66%, smaller than the maximum AEP.L drawdown of -77.26%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for IBKR and AEP.L.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


IBKRAEP.LDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-63.66%

-77.26%

+13.60%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-18.70%

-34.60%

+15.90%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-38.66%

-34.60%

-4.06%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-38.66%

-35.42%

-3.24%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-55.09%

-64.61%

+9.52%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-2.69%

-33.35%

+30.66%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-24.86%

-33.79%

+8.93%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

7.34%

6.71%

+0.63%

Volatility

IBKR vs. AEP.L - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for Interactive Brokers Group, Inc. (IBKR) is 10.40%, while Anglo-Eastern Plantations plc (AEP.L) has a volatility of 30.82%. This indicates that IBKR experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than AEP.L based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


IBKRAEP.LDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

10.40%

30.82%

-20.42%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

27.58%

38.16%

-10.58%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

37.58%

45.56%

-7.98%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

34.45%

34.43%

+0.02%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

33.36%

35.66%

-2.30%

Dividends

IBKR vs. AEP.L - Dividend Comparison

IBKR's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 0.38%, less than AEP.L's 4.28% yield.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
AEP.L
Anglo-Eastern Plantations plc
4.28%4.80%1.81%4.78%0.51%0.10%0.07%0.41%0.52%0.39%0.00%0.00%
IBKR
Interactive Brokers Group, Inc.
0.38%0.47%0.48%0.48%0.55%0.50%0.66%0.86%0.73%0.68%1.10%0.92%

Financials

IBKR vs. AEP.L - Financials Comparison

This section allows you to compare key financial metrics between Interactive Brokers Group, Inc. and Anglo-Eastern Plantations plc. You can select fields from income statements, balance sheets, and cash flow statements to easily visualize and compare the financial health of both companies.


Quarterly
Annual

Total Revenue: Total amount of money received from sales and other business activities


0.00500.00M1.00B1.50B2.00B2.50B20222023202420252026
765.00M
235.87M
(IBKR) Total Revenue
(AEP.L) Total Revenue
Please note, different currencies. IBKR values in USD, AEP.L values in GBp

Frequently Asked Questions


IBKR and AEP.L have a correlation of 0.17, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for IBKR and AEP.L

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer