PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
IBIT vs. NVO
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

IBIT vs. NVO - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in iShares Bitcoin Trust ETF (IBIT) and Novo Nordisk A/S (NVO). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, IBIT achieves a -27.41% return, which is significantly lower than NVO's -10.74% return.


IBIT

1D
-0.03%
1M
-20.12%
YTD
-27.41%
6M
-29.61%
1Y
-40.63%
3Y*
5Y*
10Y*

NVO

1D
-0.18%
1M
-6.80%
YTD
-10.74%
6M
-9.50%
1Y
-43.34%
3Y*
-15.59%
5Y*
2.92%
10Y*
7.56%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

IBIT vs. NVO - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)20252024
IBIT
iShares Bitcoin Trust ETF
-27.41%-6.41%89.87%
NVO
Novo Nordisk A/S
-10.74%-39.22%-19.97%

Correlation

The correlation between IBIT and NVO is 0.22, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.22

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Jan 11, 2024

0.15

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

IBIT vs. NVO — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

IBIT
IBIT Risk / Return Rank: 33
Overall Rank
IBIT Sharpe Ratio Rank: 22
Sharpe Ratio Rank
IBIT Sortino Ratio Rank: 33
Sortino Ratio Rank
IBIT Omega Ratio Rank: 33
Omega Ratio Rank
IBIT Calmar Ratio Rank: 33
Calmar Ratio Rank
IBIT Martin Ratio Rank: 22
Martin Ratio Rank

NVO
NVO Risk / Return Rank: 1212
Overall Rank
NVO Sharpe Ratio Rank: 99
Sharpe Ratio Rank
NVO Sortino Ratio Rank: 1212
Sortino Ratio Rank
NVO Omega Ratio Rank: 1010
Omega Ratio Rank
NVO Calmar Ratio Rank: 1212
Calmar Ratio Rank
NVO Martin Ratio Rank: 1616
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

IBIT vs. NVO - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for iShares Bitcoin Trust ETF (IBIT) and Novo Nordisk A/S (NVO). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.


IBITNVODifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

-0.09

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

-0.26

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

0.85

0.85

0.00

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

-0.78

-0.80

+0.02

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

-1.37

-1.18

-0.19

IBIT vs. NVO - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current IBIT Sharpe Ratio is -0.92, which is comparable to the NVO Sharpe Ratio of -0.84. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of IBIT and NVO, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Drawdowns

IBIT vs. NVO - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum IBIT drawdown since its inception was -52.11%, smaller than the maximum NVO drawdown of -74.70%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for IBIT and NVO.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


IBITNVODifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-52.11%

-74.70%

+22.59%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-52.11%

-54.34%

+2.23%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-74.70%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-74.70%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-74.70%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-49.45%

-68.11%

+18.66%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-16.53%

-17.79%

+1.26%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

29.64%

37.62%

-7.98%

Volatility

IBIT vs. NVO - Volatility Comparison

iShares Bitcoin Trust ETF (IBIT) has a higher volatility of 12.07% compared to Novo Nordisk A/S (NVO) at 10.68%. This indicates that IBIT's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than NVO based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


IBITNVODifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

12.07%

10.68%

+1.39%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

34.45%

38.04%

-3.59%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

44.10%

51.88%

-7.78%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

50.26%

38.33%

+11.93%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

50.26%

32.56%

+17.70%

Dividends

IBIT vs. NVO - Dividend Comparison

IBIT has not paid dividends to shareholders, while NVO's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 4.11%.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
IBIT
iShares Bitcoin Trust ETF
0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%
NVO
Novo Nordisk A/S
4.11%3.31%1.68%1.00%1.20%1.35%1.87%2.14%1.45%1.52%2.87%0.92%

Frequently Asked Questions


IBIT and NVO have a correlation of 0.22, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

IBIT has higher volatility (12.07%) compared to NVO (10.68%). In terms of maximum drawdown, IBIT dropped -52.11% vs NVO's -74.70%.

NVO currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (-0.84 vs -0.92), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for IBIT and NVO

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer