IBIT vs. LSMC.DE
IBIT (iShares Bitcoin Trust ETF) and LSMC.DE (Amundi MSCI Semiconductors ESG Screened UCITS ETF) are both exchange-traded funds - IBIT is a Cryptocurrency fund tracking the CME CF Bitcoin Reference Rate - New York Variant, while LSMC.DE is a Semiconductors fund tracking the MSCI ACWI Semiconductors & Semiconductor Equipment ESG Filtered NET USD Index. Both are passively managed. Over the past year, IBIT returned -40.63% vs 120.76% for LSMC.DE. At a 0.25 correlation, their price movements are largely independent. IBIT charges 0.25%/yr vs 0.45%/yr for LSMC.DE.
Performance
IBIT vs. LSMC.DE - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Different Trading Currencies
IBIT is traded in USD, while LSMC.DE is traded in EUR. To make them comparable, the LSMC.DE values have been converted to USD using the latest available exchange rates.
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, IBIT achieves a -27.41% return, which is significantly lower than LSMC.DE's 59.97% return.
IBIT
- 1D
- -0.03%
- 1M
- -20.12%
- YTD
- -27.41%
- 6M
- -29.61%
- 1Y
- -40.63%
- 3Y*
- —
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
LSMC.DE
- 1D
- 4.03%
- 1M
- 5.70%
- YTD
- 59.97%
- 6M
- 65.80%
- 1Y
- 120.76%
- 3Y*
- 62.59%
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
IBIT vs. LSMC.DE - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | |
|---|---|---|---|
IBIT iShares Bitcoin Trust ETF | -27.41% | -6.41% | 89.87% |
LSMC.DE Amundi MSCI Semiconductors ESG Screened UCITS ETF | 59.97% | 49.69% | 58.17% |
Correlation
The correlation between IBIT and LSMC.DE is 0.41, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.41 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Jan 11, 2024 | 0.25 |
The correlation between IBIT and LSMC.DE shifts across timeframes, from 0.25 (all time) to 0.41 (1 year), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
IBIT vs. LSMC.DE — Risk / Return Rank
IBIT
LSMC.DE
IBIT vs. LSMC.DE - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for iShares Bitcoin Trust ETF (IBIT) and Amundi MSCI Semiconductors ESG Screened UCITS ETF (LSMC.DE). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.
| IBIT | LSMC.DE | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | -4.71 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | -5.44 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 0.85 | 1.53 | -0.68 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | -0.78 | 8.21 | -8.99 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | -1.37 | 28.02 | -29.39 |
Loading charts...
Drawdowns
IBIT vs. LSMC.DE - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum IBIT drawdown since its inception was -52.11%, which is greater than LSMC.DE's maximum drawdown of -47.95%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for IBIT and LSMC.DE.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| IBIT | LSMC.DE | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -52.11% | -47.95% | -4.16% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -52.11% | -14.63% | -37.48% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | — | -32.83% | — |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -49.45% | -4.40% | -45.05% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -16.53% | -12.82% | -3.71% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 29.64% | 4.29% | +25.35% |
Volatility
IBIT vs. LSMC.DE - Volatility Comparison
iShares Bitcoin Trust ETF (IBIT) and Amundi MSCI Semiconductors ESG Screened UCITS ETF (LSMC.DE) have volatilities of 12.07% and 12.32%, respectively, indicating that both stocks experience similar levels of price fluctuations. This suggests that the risk associated with both stocks, as measured by volatility, is nearly the same. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| IBIT | LSMC.DE | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 12.07% | 12.32% | -0.25% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 34.45% | 24.51% | +9.94% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 44.10% | 31.71% | +12.39% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 50.26% | 33.63% | +16.63% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 50.26% | 33.63% | +16.63% |
IBIT vs. LSMC.DE - Expense Ratio Comparison
IBIT has a 0.25% expense ratio, which is lower than LSMC.DE's 0.45% expense ratio.
Dividends
IBIT vs. LSMC.DE - Dividend Comparison
Neither IBIT nor LSMC.DE has paid dividends to shareholders.
Frequently Asked Questions
IBIT and LSMC.DE have a correlation of 0.41, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
On fees, IBIT is cheaper at 0.25% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
IBIT is cheaper with a 0.25% expense ratio, compared with 0.45% for LSMC.DE.
IBIT is categorized as Cryptocurrency, while LSMC.DE is Semiconductors. IBIT tracks CME CF Bitcoin Reference Rate - New York Variant, while LSMC.DE tracks MSCI ACWI Semiconductors & Semiconductor Equipment ESG Filtered NET USD Index. They also come from different issuers: iShares and Amundi. Their fees differ too: 0.25% for IBIT and 0.45% for LSMC.DE.
Find the right allocation for IBIT and LSMC.DE
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer