IBIT vs. IVV
IBIT (iShares Bitcoin Trust ETF) and IVV (iShares Core S&P 500 ETF) are both exchange-traded funds - IBIT is a Cryptocurrency fund tracking the CME CF Bitcoin Reference Rate - New York Variant, while IVV is a S&P 500 fund tracking the S&P 500 Index. Both are passively managed. Over the past year, IBIT returned -44.19% vs 23.63% for IVV. Their 0.40 correlation means their historical movements had little consistent relationship. IBIT charges 0.25%/yr vs 0.03%/yr for IVV.
Performance
IBIT vs. IVV - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, IBIT achieves a -26.71% return, which is significantly lower than IVV's 13.72% return.
IBIT
- 1D
- 0.64%
- 1M
- 4.36%
- 6M
- -15.96%
- YTD
- -26.71%
- 1Y
- -44.19%
- 3Y*
- —
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
- ALL TIME*
- 10.86%
IVV
- 1D
- 1.77%
- 1M
- 3.52%
- 6M
- 12.47%
- YTD
- 13.72%
- 1Y
- 23.63%
- 3Y*
- 21.56%
- 5Y*
- 13.38%
- 10Y*
- 15.35%
- ALL TIME*
- 8.58%
Liquidity Comparison
| Position | Avg. Volume Value (2W) | Avg. Volume Value (1M) | Avg. Volume Value (3M) |
|---|---|---|---|
| $1.29B | $1.33B | $1.64B | |
| $3.45B | $3.28B | $5.84B |
IBIT vs. IVV - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | |
|---|---|---|---|
IBIT iShares Bitcoin Trust ETF | -26.71% | -6.41% | 89.87% |
IVV iShares Core S&P 500 ETF | 13.72% | 17.85% | 24.63% |
Correlation
The correlation between IBIT and IVV is 0.47, which is low. Their historical price movements had little consistent relationship.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Focuses on recent behavior, but can change the most. | 0.47 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Jan 11, 2024 | 0.40 |
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
IBIT vs. IVV — Risk / Return Rank
IBIT
IVV
IBIT vs. IVV - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for iShares Bitcoin Trust ETF (IBIT) and iShares Core S&P 500 ETF (IVV). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.
| IBIT | IVV | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | -2.84 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | -4.01 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 0.84 | 1.33 | -0.49 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | -0.83 | 2.67 | -3.50 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | -1.27 | 11.38 | -12.64 |
Loading charts...
Drawdowns
IBIT vs. IVV - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum IBIT drawdown since its inception was -53.30%, roughly equal to the maximum IVV drawdown of -55.25%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for IBIT and IVV.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| IBIT | IVV | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -53.30% | -55.25% | +1.95% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -53.30% | -8.89% | -44.41% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | — | -18.75% | — |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | — | -24.53% | — |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | — | -33.90% | — |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -48.95% | 0.00% | -48.95% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -18.34% | -10.72% | -7.62% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 34.94% | 2.08% | +32.86% |
Volatility
IBIT vs. IVV - Volatility Comparison
iShares Bitcoin Trust ETF (IBIT) has a higher volatility of 8.29% compared to iShares Core S&P 500 ETF (IVV) at 4.10%. This indicates that IBIT's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than IVV based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| IBIT | IVV | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 8.29% | 4.10% | +4.19% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 33.07% | 10.39% | +22.68% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 44.40% | 12.96% | +31.44% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 49.53% | 17.04% | +32.49% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 49.53% | 18.08% | +31.45% |
IBIT vs. IVV - Expense Ratio Comparison
IBIT has a 0.25% expense ratio, which is higher than IVV's 0.03% expense ratio. However, both funds are considered low-cost compared to the broader market, where average expense ratios usually range from 0.3% to 0.9%.
Dividends
IBIT vs. IVV - Dividend Comparison
IBIT has not paid dividends to shareholders, while IVV's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 1.06%.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
IBIT iShares Bitcoin Trust ETF | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
IVV iShares Core S&P 500 ETF | 1.06% | 1.17% | 1.30% | 1.44% | 1.66% | 1.20% | 1.57% | 1.85% | 2.21% | 1.75% | 2.01% | 2.27% |
Frequently Asked Questions
IBIT and IVV have a correlation of 0.47, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
IBIT has higher volatility (8.29%) compared to IVV (4.10%). In terms of maximum drawdown, IBIT dropped -53.30% vs IVV's -55.25%.
On 1-year performance, IVV leads with 23.63% vs -44.19% for IBIT. On fees, IVV is cheaper at 0.03% per year. On volatility, IVV has been the lower-risk option at 4.10%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
Over the 1-year period, IVV has performed better with a 23.63% return vs -44.19%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.
IVV is cheaper with a 0.03% expense ratio, compared with 0.25% for IBIT.
IVV has the higher dividend yield at 1.06%, compared with 0.00% for IBIT.
IBIT is categorized as Cryptocurrency, while IVV is S&P 500. IBIT tracks CME CF Bitcoin Reference Rate - New York Variant, while IVV tracks S&P 500 Index. Their fees differ too: 0.25% for IBIT and 0.03% for IVV.
IVV currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (1.84 vs -1.00), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.
Find the right allocation for IBIT and IVV
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer