IBIT vs. BTCW

Last updated Jun 4, 2026

IBIT (iShares Bitcoin Trust ETF) and BTCW (Wisdom Tree Bitcoin Fund) are both Cryptocurrency funds. Over the past year, IBIT returned -38.74% vs -38.63% for BTCW. With a 1.00 correlation, they move nearly in lockstep. IBIT charges 0.25%/yr vs 0.30%/yr for BTCW.

Performance

IBIT vs. BTCW - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in iShares Bitcoin Trust ETF (IBIT) and Wisdom Tree Bitcoin Fund (BTCW). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Returns By Period

The year-to-date returns for both investments are quite close, with IBIT having a -25.48% return and BTCW slightly higher at -25.39%.

IBIT

• 1D: -2.76%
• 1M: -18.50%
• YTD: -25.48%
• 6M: -29.84%
• 1Y: -38.74%
• 3Y*: —
• 5Y*: —
• 10Y*: —

BTCW

• 1D: -2.62%
• 1M: -18.38%
• YTD: -25.39%
• 6M: -29.81%
• 1Y: -38.63%
• 3Y*: —
• 5Y*: —
• 10Y*: —

*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

IBIT vs. BTCW - Yearly Performance Comparison

	2026 (YTD)	2025	2024
IBIT iShares Bitcoin Trust ETF	-25.48%	-6.41%	99.21%
BTCW Wisdom Tree Bitcoin Fund	-25.39%	-6.05%	100.00%

Correlation

The correlation between IBIT and BTCW is 1.00 - these two move nearly in lockstep. At this level, holding both provides almost no diversification benefit. If you already own one, adding the other does little to reduce portfolio risk.

	Correlation
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	1.00
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Jan 12, 2024	1.00

The correlation between IBIT and BTCW has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 1.00 to 1.00 - a consistent structural relationship.

Return for Risk

IBIT vs. BTCW — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

IBIT

IBIT Risk / Return Rank: 2
IBIT Sharpe Ratio Rank: 2
IBIT Sortino Ratio Rank: 2
IBIT Omega Ratio Rank: 2
IBIT Calmar Ratio Rank: 2
IBIT Martin Ratio Rank: 2

BTCW

BTCW Risk / Return Rank: 2
BTCW Sharpe Ratio Rank: 2
BTCW Sortino Ratio Rank: 2
BTCW Omega Ratio Rank: 2
BTCW Calmar Ratio Rank: 2
BTCW Martin Ratio Rank: 2

The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

IBIT vs. BTCW - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for iShares Bitcoin Trust ETF (IBIT) and Wisdom Tree Bitcoin Fund (BTCW). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

	IBIT	BTCW	Difference
Sharpe ratio: Return per unit of total volatility	-0.89	-0.89	0.00
Sortino ratio: Return per unit of downside risk	-1.23	-1.23	0.00
Omega ratio: Gain probability vs. loss probability	0.86	0.86	0.00
Calmar ratio: Return relative to maximum drawdown	-0.79	-0.79	0.00
Martin ratio: Return relative to average drawdown	-1.36	-1.36	0.00
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month.

IBIT vs. BTCW - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current IBIT Sharpe Ratio is -0.89, which is comparable to the BTCW Sharpe Ratio of -0.89. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of IBIT and BTCW, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.

Sharpe Ratios by Period

	IBIT	BTCW	Difference
Sharpe Ratio (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	-0.89	-0.89	0.00
Sharpe Ratio (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history	0.30	0.31	-0.01

Drawdowns

IBIT vs. BTCW - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum IBIT drawdown since its inception was -49.36%, roughly equal to the maximum BTCW drawdown of -49.29%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for IBIT and BTCW.

Drawdown Indicators

	IBIT	BTCW	Difference
Max Drawdown Largest peak-to-trough decline	-49.36%	-49.29%	-0.07%
Max Drawdown (1Y) Largest decline over 1 year	-49.36%	-49.29%	-0.07%
Current Drawdown Current decline from peak	-48.10%	-47.99%	-0.11%
Average Drawdown Average peak-to-trough decline	-16.02%	-15.99%	-0.03%
Ulcer Index Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks	28.44%	28.40%	+0.04%

Volatility

IBIT vs. BTCW - Volatility Comparison

iShares Bitcoin Trust ETF (IBIT) and Wisdom Tree Bitcoin Fund (BTCW) have volatilities of 9.50% and 9.48%, respectively, indicating that both stocks experience similar levels of price fluctuations. This suggests that the risk associated with both stocks, as measured by volatility, is nearly the same. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.

Volatility by Period

	IBIT	BTCW	Difference
Volatility (1M) Calculated over the trailing 1-month period	9.50%	9.48%	+0.02%
Volatility (6M) Calculated over the trailing 6-month period	34.44%	34.25%	+0.19%
Volatility (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	43.73%	43.53%	+0.20%
Volatility (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized	50.19%	50.10%	+0.09%
Volatility (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized	50.19%	50.10%	+0.09%

IBIT vs. BTCW - Expense Ratio Comparison

IBIT has a 0.25% expense ratio, which is lower than BTCW's 0.30% expense ratio.

Dividends

IBIT vs. BTCW - Dividend Comparison

Neither IBIT nor BTCW has paid dividends to shareholders.

Tickers have no history of dividend payments

Frequently Asked Questions

Can I hold both IBIT and BTCW in my portfolio?

With a correlation of 1.00, IBIT and BTCW move almost identically. Holding both adds very little diversification - you're essentially doubling your position in the same market segment. Choosing one is usually more capital-efficient.

Which is riskier, IBIT or BTCW?

IBIT has higher volatility (9.50%) compared to BTCW (9.48%). In terms of maximum drawdown, IBIT dropped -49.36% vs BTCW's -49.29%.

Which ETF is better, IBIT or BTCW?

On 1-year performance, BTCW leads with -38.63% vs -38.74% for IBIT. On fees, IBIT is cheaper at 0.25% per year. Their volatility is very similar. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Which ETF has performed better, IBIT or BTCW?

Over the 1-year period, BTCW has performed better with a -38.63% return vs -38.74%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.

Which ETF is cheaper, IBIT or BTCW?

IBIT is cheaper with a 0.25% expense ratio, compared with 0.30% for BTCW.

Which ETF pays a higher dividend yield, IBIT or BTCW?

IBIT and BTCW have nearly identical dividend yields, around 0.00%.

What is the main difference between IBIT and BTCW?

They also come from different issuers: iShares and WisdomTree. Their fees differ too: 0.25% for IBIT and 0.30% for BTCW.

Which has better risk-adjusted returns?

IBIT currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (-0.89 vs -0.89), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.