PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
IBII vs. IBID
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

IBII vs. IBID - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in iShares iBonds Oct 2032 Term TIPS ETF (IBII) and iShares iBonds Oct 2027 Term TIPS ETF (IBID). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, IBII achieves a 1.63% return, which is significantly lower than IBID's 2.40% return.


IBII

1D
0.02%
1M
-0.38%
YTD
1.63%
6M
1.21%
1Y
5.28%
3Y*
5Y*
10Y*

IBID

1D
-0.05%
1M
0.42%
YTD
2.40%
6M
2.47%
1Y
4.68%
3Y*
5Y*
10Y*
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

IBII vs. IBID - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)202520242023
IBII
iShares iBonds Oct 2032 Term TIPS ETF
1.63%8.65%1.21%4.85%
IBID
iShares iBonds Oct 2027 Term TIPS ETF
2.40%5.66%4.71%3.05%

Correlation

The correlation between IBII and IBID is 0.48, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.48

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Sep 22, 2023

0.73

Over the past year, the correlation between IBII and IBID has dropped to 0.48 - well below their long-term average of 0.73, suggesting their price drivers have been diverging.

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

IBII vs. IBID — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

IBII
IBII Risk / Return Rank: 5050
Overall Rank
IBII Sharpe Ratio Rank: 4646
Sharpe Ratio Rank
IBII Sortino Ratio Rank: 4949
Sortino Ratio Rank
IBII Omega Ratio Rank: 4545
Omega Ratio Rank
IBII Calmar Ratio Rank: 5555
Calmar Ratio Rank
IBII Martin Ratio Rank: 5555
Martin Ratio Rank

IBID
IBID Risk / Return Rank: 9797
Overall Rank
IBID Sharpe Ratio Rank: 9595
Sharpe Ratio Rank
IBID Sortino Ratio Rank: 9797
Sortino Ratio Rank
IBID Omega Ratio Rank: 9797
Omega Ratio Rank
IBID Calmar Ratio Rank: 9898
Calmar Ratio Rank
IBID Martin Ratio Rank: 9797
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

IBII vs. IBID - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for iShares iBonds Oct 2032 Term TIPS ETF (IBII) and iShares iBonds Oct 2027 Term TIPS ETF (IBID). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


IBIIIBIDDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

-2.22

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

-4.14

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.28

1.90

-0.62

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

2.68

12.89

-10.22

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

9.32

39.18

-29.86

IBII vs. IBID - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current IBII Sharpe Ratio is 1.56, which is lower than the IBID Sharpe Ratio of 3.78. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of IBII and IBID, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Sharpe Ratios by Period


IBIIIBIDDifference

Sharpe Ratio (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

1.56

3.78

-2.22

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

1.12

2.55

-1.42

Drawdowns

IBII vs. IBID - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum IBII drawdown since its inception was -4.65%, which is greater than IBID's maximum drawdown of -1.28%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for IBII and IBID.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


IBIIIBIDDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-4.65%

-1.28%

-3.37%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-1.98%

-0.36%

-1.62%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-0.65%

-0.05%

-0.60%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-1.12%

-0.22%

-0.90%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

0.58%

0.12%

+0.46%

Volatility

IBII vs. IBID - Volatility Comparison

iShares iBonds Oct 2032 Term TIPS ETF (IBII) has a higher volatility of 0.89% compared to iShares iBonds Oct 2027 Term TIPS ETF (IBID) at 0.33%. This indicates that IBII's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than IBID based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


IBIIIBIDDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

0.89%

0.33%

+0.56%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

2.29%

0.80%

+1.49%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

3.42%

1.24%

+2.18%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

5.42%

2.25%

+3.17%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

5.42%

2.25%

+3.17%

IBII vs. IBID - Expense Ratio Comparison

Both IBII and IBID have an expense ratio of 0.10%, making them cost-effective options compared to the broader market, where average expense ratios typically range from 0.3% to 0.9%.


Dividends

IBII vs. IBID - Dividend Comparison

IBII's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 4.05%, more than IBID's 3.67% yield.


PositionTTM202520242023
IBID
iShares iBonds Oct 2027 Term TIPS ETF
3.67%4.43%4.24%0.81%
IBII
iShares iBonds Oct 2032 Term TIPS ETF
4.05%4.80%4.76%1.10%

Frequently Asked Questions


IBII and IBID have a correlation of 0.48, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

IBII has higher volatility (0.89%) compared to IBID (0.33%). In terms of maximum drawdown, IBII dropped -4.65% vs IBID's -1.28%.

On 1-year performance, IBII leads with 5.28% vs 4.68% for IBID. Both ETFs have the same 0.10% expense ratio. On volatility, IBID has been the lower-risk option at 0.33%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Over the 1-year period, IBII has performed better with a 5.28% return vs 4.68%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.

IBII and IBID have the same expense ratio: 0.10% per year.

IBII has the higher dividend yield at 4.05%, compared with 3.67% for IBID.

IBII tracks ICE 2032 Maturity US Inflation-Linked Treasury Index, while IBID tracks ICE 2027 Maturity US Inflation-Linked Treasury Index.

IBID currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (3.78 vs 1.56), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for IBII and IBID

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer