IBIF vs. STIP
IBIF (iShares iBonds Oct 2029 Term TIPS ETF) and STIP (iShares 0-5 Year TIPS Bond ETF) are both Inflation-Protected Bonds funds from iShares - IBIF tracks the ICE 2029 Maturity US Inflation-Linked Treasury Index while STIP tracks the Bloomberg US Treasury Inflation-Protected Securities (TIPS) 0-5 Years Index (Series-L). Both are passively managed. Over the past year, IBIF returned 3.63% vs 3.64% for STIP. Their correlation of 0.93 suggests significant overlap in exposure. IBIF charges 0.10%/yr vs 0.06%/yr for STIP.
Performance
IBIF vs. STIP - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, IBIF achieves a 1.13% return, which is significantly lower than STIP's 1.33% return.
IBIF
- 1D
- -0.14%
- 1M
- -0.31%
- YTD
- 1.13%
- 6M
- 1.18%
- 1Y
- 3.63%
- 3Y*
- —
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
STIP
- 1D
- -0.22%
- 1M
- -0.30%
- YTD
- 1.33%
- 6M
- 1.45%
- 1Y
- 3.64%
- 3Y*
- 4.99%
- 5Y*
- 3.26%
- 10Y*
- 3.07%
IBIF vs. STIP - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|
IBIF iShares iBonds Oct 2029 Term TIPS ETF | 1.13% | 7.27% | 3.11% | 3.95% |
STIP iShares 0-5 Year TIPS Bond ETF | 1.33% | 6.03% | 4.77% | 2.42% |
Correlation
The correlation between IBIF and STIP is 0.90, indicating a strong positive relationship between their price movements. Combining them offers limited diversification - they tend to fall together during downturns.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.90 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Sep 21, 2023 | 0.93 |
The correlation between IBIF and STIP has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.90 to 0.93 - a consistent structural relationship.
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
IBIF vs. STIP — Risk / Return Rank
IBIF
STIP
IBIF vs. STIP - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for iShares iBonds Oct 2029 Term TIPS ETF (IBIF) and iShares 0-5 Year TIPS Bond ETF (STIP). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.
| IBIF | STIP | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | -0.62 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | -0.96 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.34 | 1.49 | -0.15 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 3.84 | 5.04 | -1.20 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 11.95 | 19.01 | -7.06 |
Loading charts...
Drawdowns
IBIF vs. STIP - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum IBIF drawdown since its inception was -2.50%, smaller than the maximum STIP drawdown of -5.50%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for IBIF and STIP.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| IBIF | STIP | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -2.50% | -5.50% | +3.00% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -0.95% | -0.73% | -0.22% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | — | -0.95% | — |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | — | -5.50% | — |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | — | -5.50% | — |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -0.88% | -0.73% | -0.15% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -0.55% | -0.99% | +0.44% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 0.30% | 0.19% | +0.11% |
Volatility
IBIF vs. STIP - Volatility Comparison
iShares iBonds Oct 2029 Term TIPS ETF (IBIF) has a higher volatility of 0.75% compared to iShares 0-5 Year TIPS Bond ETF (STIP) at 0.65%. This indicates that IBIF's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than STIP based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| IBIF | STIP | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 0.75% | 0.65% | +0.10% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 1.46% | 1.14% | +0.32% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 2.07% | 1.54% | +0.53% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 3.54% | 2.74% | +0.80% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 3.54% | 2.46% | +1.08% |
IBIF vs. STIP - Expense Ratio Comparison
IBIF has a 0.10% expense ratio, which is higher than STIP's 0.06% expense ratio. However, both funds are considered low-cost compared to the broader market, where average expense ratios usually range from 0.3% to 0.9%.
Dividends
IBIF vs. STIP - Dividend Comparison
IBIF's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 3.77%, less than STIP's 4.33% yield.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
IBIF iShares iBonds Oct 2029 Term TIPS ETF | 3.77% | 4.51% | 4.05% | 0.96% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
STIP iShares 0-5 Year TIPS Bond ETF | 4.33% | 4.11% | 2.62% | 2.84% | 6.04% | 4.15% | 1.40% | 2.06% | 2.44% | 1.59% | 0.89% |
Frequently Asked Questions
With a correlation of 0.90, IBIF and STIP move almost identically. Holding both adds very little diversification - you're essentially doubling your position in the same market segment. Choosing one is usually more capital-efficient.
IBIF has higher volatility (0.75%) compared to STIP (0.65%). In terms of maximum drawdown, IBIF dropped -2.50% vs STIP's -5.50%.
On 1-year performance, STIP leads with 3.64% vs 3.63% for IBIF. On fees, STIP is cheaper at 0.06% per year. On volatility, STIP has been the lower-risk option at 0.65%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
Over the 1-year period, STIP has performed better with a 3.64% return vs 3.63%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.
STIP is cheaper with a 0.06% expense ratio, compared with 0.10% for IBIF.
STIP has the higher dividend yield at 4.33%, compared with 3.77% for IBIF.
IBIF tracks ICE 2029 Maturity US Inflation-Linked Treasury Index, while STIP tracks Bloomberg US Treasury Inflation-Protected Securities (TIPS) 0-5 Years Index (Series-L). Their fees differ too: 0.10% for IBIF and 0.06% for STIP.
STIP currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (2.38 vs 1.76), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.
Find the right allocation for IBIF and STIP
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer