PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
IBIF vs. IBIH
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

IBIF vs. IBIH - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in iShares iBonds Oct 2029 Term TIPS ETF (IBIF) and iShares iBonds Oct 2031 Term TIPS ETF (IBIH). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, IBIF achieves a 1.50% return, which is significantly higher than IBIH's 1.04% return.


IBIF

1D
-0.11%
1M
0.14%
6M
0.80%
YTD
1.50%
1Y
2.58%
3Y*
5Y*
10Y*
ALL TIME*
5.55%

IBIH

1D
-0.21%
1M
-0.25%
6M
0.21%
YTD
1.04%
1Y
2.20%
3Y*
5Y*
10Y*
ALL TIME*
5.53%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

Liquidity Comparison


PositionAvg. Volume Value (2W)Avg. Volume Value (1M)Avg. Volume Value (3M)
$539.78K$483.63K$471.28K
$435.14K$428.04K$430.49K

IBIF vs. IBIH - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)202520242023
IBIF
iShares iBonds Oct 2029 Term TIPS ETF
1.50%7.27%3.11%3.95%
IBIH
iShares iBonds Oct 2031 Term TIPS ETF
1.04%8.47%1.73%4.60%

Correlation

The correlation between IBIF and IBIH is 0.87, meaning they have usually moved in the same direction, including during past declines.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Focuses on recent behavior, but can change the most.

0.87

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Sep 21, 2023

0.93

The correlation between IBIF and IBIH has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.87 to 0.93 - a consistent structural relationship.

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

IBIF vs. IBIH — Risk / Return Rank

Compare historical risk-adjusted metric ranks over the past 12 months.

IBIF
IBIF Risk / Return Rank: 7474
Overall Rank
IBIF Sharpe Ratio Rank: 6666
Sharpe Ratio Rank
IBIF Sortino Ratio Rank: 7676
Sortino Ratio Rank
IBIF Omega Ratio Rank: 7171
Omega Ratio Rank
IBIF Calmar Ratio Rank: 8585
Calmar Ratio Rank
IBIF Martin Ratio Rank: 7070
Martin Ratio Rank

IBIH
IBIH Risk / Return Rank: 4141
Overall Rank
IBIH Sharpe Ratio Rank: 3838
Sharpe Ratio Rank
IBIH Sortino Ratio Rank: 3838
Sortino Ratio Rank
IBIH Omega Ratio Rank: 3535
Omega Ratio Rank
IBIH Calmar Ratio Rank: 4949
Calmar Ratio Rank
IBIH Martin Ratio Rank: 4242
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) uses a weighted average of the Sharpe, Sortino, Omega, Calmar, and Martin percentile ranks for the trailing 12 months. Higher means stronger historical risk-adjusted performance within the peer group.

IBIF vs. IBIH - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for iShares iBonds Oct 2029 Term TIPS ETF (IBIF) and iShares iBonds Oct 2031 Term TIPS ETF (IBIH). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.


IBIFIBIHDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

+0.59

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

+1.04

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.30

1.17

+0.13

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

3.29

1.76

+1.53

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

8.69

4.68

+4.01

IBIF vs. IBIH - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current IBIF Sharpe Ratio is 1.55, which is higher than the IBIH Sharpe Ratio of 0.95. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of IBIF and IBIH, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Drawdowns

IBIF vs. IBIH - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum IBIF drawdown since its inception was -2.50%, smaller than the maximum IBIH drawdown of -3.94%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for IBIF and IBIH.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


IBIFIBIHDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-2.50%

-3.94%

+1.44%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-0.95%

-1.70%

+0.75%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-0.51%

-1.17%

+0.66%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-0.55%

-0.96%

+0.41%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

0.36%

0.64%

-0.28%

Volatility

IBIF vs. IBIH - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for iShares iBonds Oct 2029 Term TIPS ETF (IBIF) is 0.47%, while iShares iBonds Oct 2031 Term TIPS ETF (IBIH) has a volatility of 0.68%. This indicates that IBIF experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than IBIH based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


IBIFIBIHDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

0.47%

0.68%

-0.21%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

1.47%

2.37%

-0.90%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

2.02%

3.14%

-1.12%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

3.48%

4.87%

-1.39%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

3.48%

4.87%

-1.39%

IBIF vs. IBIH - Expense Ratio Comparison

Both IBIF and IBIH have an expense ratio of 0.10%, making them cost-effective options compared to the broader market, where average expense ratios typically range from 0.3% to 0.9%.


Dividends

IBIF vs. IBIH - Dividend Comparison

IBIF's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 4.94%, which matches IBIH's 4.98% yield.


PositionTTM202520242023
IBIF
iShares iBonds Oct 2029 Term TIPS ETF
4.94%4.51%4.05%0.96%
IBIH
iShares iBonds Oct 2031 Term TIPS ETF
4.98%4.68%4.34%0.70%

Frequently Asked Questions


IBIF and IBIH have a correlation of 0.87, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

IBIH has higher volatility (0.68%) compared to IBIF (0.47%). In terms of maximum drawdown, IBIF dropped -2.50% vs IBIH's -3.94%.

On 1-year performance, IBIF leads with 2.58% vs 2.20% for IBIH. Both ETFs have the same 0.10% expense ratio. On volatility, IBIF has been the lower-risk option at 0.47%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Over the 1-year period, IBIF has performed better with a 2.58% return vs 2.20%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.

IBIF and IBIH have the same expense ratio: 0.10% per year.

IBIH has the higher dividend yield at 4.98%, compared with 4.94% for IBIF.

IBIF tracks ICE 2029 Maturity US Inflation-Linked Treasury Index, while IBIH tracks ICE 2031 Maturity US Inflation-Linked Treasury Index.

IBIF currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (1.55 vs 0.95), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for IBIF and IBIH

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer