PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
IBIE vs. STIP
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

IBIE vs. STIP - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in iShares iBonds Oct 2028 Term TIPS ETF (IBIE) and iShares 0-5 Year TIPS Bond ETF (STIP). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

The year-to-date returns for both stocks are quite close, with IBIE having a 2.10% return and STIP slightly lower at 2.04%.


IBIE

1D
0.00%
1M
0.23%
YTD
2.10%
6M
2.07%
1Y
4.80%
3Y*
5Y*
10Y*

STIP

1D
0.00%
1M
0.03%
YTD
2.04%
6M
2.03%
1Y
4.68%
3Y*
5.23%
5Y*
3.37%
10Y*
3.18%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

IBIE vs. STIP - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)202520242023
IBIE
iShares iBonds Oct 2028 Term TIPS ETF
2.10%6.46%3.95%2.93%
STIP
iShares 0-5 Year TIPS Bond ETF
2.04%6.03%4.77%2.20%

Correlation

The correlation between IBIE and STIP is 0.85, indicating a strong positive relationship between their price movements. Combining them offers limited diversification - they tend to fall together during downturns.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.85

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Sep 18, 2023

0.91

The correlation between IBIE and STIP has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.85 to 0.91 - a consistent structural relationship.

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

IBIE vs. STIP — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

IBIE
IBIE Risk / Return Rank: 9494
Overall Rank
IBIE Sharpe Ratio Rank: 9090
Sharpe Ratio Rank
IBIE Sortino Ratio Rank: 9696
Sortino Ratio Rank
IBIE Omega Ratio Rank: 9494
Omega Ratio Rank
IBIE Calmar Ratio Rank: 9696
Calmar Ratio Rank
IBIE Martin Ratio Rank: 9393
Martin Ratio Rank

STIP
STIP Risk / Return Rank: 9393
Overall Rank
STIP Sharpe Ratio Rank: 9191
Sharpe Ratio Rank
STIP Sortino Ratio Rank: 9696
Sortino Ratio Rank
STIP Omega Ratio Rank: 9494
Omega Ratio Rank
STIP Calmar Ratio Rank: 9393
Calmar Ratio Rank
STIP Martin Ratio Rank: 9494
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

IBIE vs. STIP - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for iShares iBonds Oct 2028 Term TIPS ETF (IBIE) and iShares 0-5 Year TIPS Bond ETF (STIP). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


IBIESTIPDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

-0.14

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

+0.01

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.69

1.69

-0.01

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

8.73

6.76

+1.97

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

25.70

26.37

-0.67

IBIE vs. STIP - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current IBIE Sharpe Ratio is 3.09, which is comparable to the STIP Sharpe Ratio of 3.23. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of IBIE and STIP, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Sharpe Ratios by Period


IBIESTIPDifference

Sharpe Ratio (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

3.09

3.23

-0.14

Sharpe Ratio (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

1.23

Sharpe Ratio (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

1.30

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

2.02

1.07

+0.95

Drawdowns

IBIE vs. STIP - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum IBIE drawdown since its inception was -1.70%, smaller than the maximum STIP drawdown of -5.50%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for IBIE and STIP.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


IBIESTIPDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-1.70%

-5.50%

+3.80%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-0.55%

-0.69%

+0.14%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-0.95%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-5.50%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-5.50%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

0.00%

-0.03%

+0.03%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-0.39%

-0.99%

+0.60%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

0.19%

0.18%

+0.01%

Volatility

IBIE vs. STIP - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for iShares iBonds Oct 2028 Term TIPS ETF (IBIE) is 0.38%, while iShares 0-5 Year TIPS Bond ETF (STIP) has a volatility of 0.40%. This indicates that IBIE experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than STIP based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


IBIESTIPDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

0.38%

0.40%

-0.02%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

0.97%

0.99%

-0.02%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

1.56%

1.46%

+0.10%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

2.86%

2.75%

+0.11%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

2.86%

2.45%

+0.41%

IBIE vs. STIP - Expense Ratio Comparison

IBIE has a 0.10% expense ratio, which is higher than STIP's 0.06% expense ratio. However, both funds are considered low-cost compared to the broader market, where average expense ratios usually range from 0.3% to 0.9%.


Dividends

IBIE vs. STIP - Dividend Comparison

IBIE's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 3.25%, less than STIP's 4.30% yield.


PositionTTM2025202420232022202120202019201820172016
IBIE
iShares iBonds Oct 2028 Term TIPS ETF
3.25%4.09%4.23%0.75%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%
STIP
iShares 0-5 Year TIPS Bond ETF
4.30%4.11%2.62%2.84%6.04%4.15%1.40%2.06%2.44%1.59%0.89%

Frequently Asked Questions


IBIE and STIP have a correlation of 0.85, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

STIP has higher volatility (0.40%) compared to IBIE (0.38%). In terms of maximum drawdown, IBIE dropped -1.70% vs STIP's -5.50%.

On 1-year performance, IBIE leads with 4.80% vs 4.68% for STIP. On fees, STIP is cheaper at 0.06% per year. Their volatility is very similar. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Over the 1-year period, IBIE has performed better with a 4.80% return vs 4.68%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.

STIP is cheaper with a 0.06% expense ratio, compared with 0.10% for IBIE.

STIP has the higher dividend yield at 4.30%, compared with 3.25% for IBIE.

IBIE tracks ICE 2028 Maturity US Inflation-Linked Treasury Index, while STIP tracks Barclays Capital U.S. Treasury Inflation-Protected Securities (TIPS) 0-5 Years Index (Series-L). Their fees differ too: 0.10% for IBIE and 0.06% for STIP.

STIP currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (3.23 vs 3.09), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for IBIE and STIP

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer