IBID vs. VRTL

Last updated Jun 25, 2026

IBID (iShares iBonds Oct 2027 Term TIPS ETF) and VRTL (GraniteShares 2x Long VRT Daily ETF) are both exchange-traded funds - IBID is a Inflation-Protected Bonds fund tracking the ICE 2027 Maturity US Inflation-Linked Treasury Index, while VRTL is a Leveraged Equities fund actively managed by GraniteShares. IBID is passively managed, while VRTL is actively managed. Over the past year, IBID returned 4.00% vs 303.87% for VRTL. At a correlation of -0.25, they often move in opposite directions. IBID charges 0.10%/yr vs 1.50%/yr for VRTL.

Performance

IBID vs. VRTL - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in iShares iBonds Oct 2027 Term TIPS ETF (IBID) and GraniteShares 2x Long VRT Daily ETF (VRTL). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, IBID achieves a 1.94% return, which is significantly lower than VRTL's 185.71% return.

IBID

• 1D: -0.00%
• 1M: -0.25%
• YTD: 1.94%
• 6M: 1.99%
• 1Y: 4.00%
• 3Y*: —
• 5Y*: —
• 10Y*: —

VRTL

• 1D: -0.73%
• 1M: -12.00%
• YTD: 185.71%
• 6M: 167.27%
• 1Y: 303.87%
• 3Y*: —
• 5Y*: —
• 10Y*: —

*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

IBID vs. VRTL - Yearly Performance Comparison

	2026 (YTD)	2025
IBID iShares iBonds Oct 2027 Term TIPS ETF	1.94%	3.31%
VRTL GraniteShares 2x Long VRT Daily ETF	185.71%	110.50%

Correlation

The correlation between IBID and VRTL is -0.22, meaning they tend to move in opposite directions. This is especially valuable for risk management - when one declines, the other has historically tended to hold steady or rise.

	Correlation
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	-0.22
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Mar 25, 2025	-0.25

Return for Risk

IBID vs. VRTL — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

IBID

IBID Risk / Return Rank: 96
IBID Sharpe Ratio Rank: 95
IBID Sortino Ratio Rank: 97
IBID Omega Ratio Rank: 96
IBID Calmar Ratio Rank: 95
IBID Martin Ratio Rank: 96

VRTL

VRTL Risk / Return Rank: 82
VRTL Sharpe Ratio Rank: 88
VRTL Sortino Ratio Rank: 73
VRTL Omega Ratio Rank: 70
VRTL Calmar Ratio Rank: 94
VRTL Martin Ratio Rank: 84

The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

IBID vs. VRTL - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for iShares iBonds Oct 2027 Term TIPS ETF (IBID) and GraniteShares 2x Long VRT Daily ETF (VRTL). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.

	IBID	VRTL	Difference
Sharpe ratio: Return per unit of total volatility	3.26	2.56	+0.70
Sortino ratio: Return per unit of downside risk	5.52	2.89	+2.63
Omega ratio: Gain probability vs. loss probability	1.74	1.36	+0.38
Calmar ratio: Return relative to maximum drawdown	7.30	6.45	+0.85
Martin ratio: Return relative to average drawdown	28.77	15.04	+13.74

IBID vs. VRTL - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current IBID Sharpe Ratio is 3.26, which is comparable to the VRTL Sharpe Ratio of 2.56. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of IBID and VRTL, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.

Drawdowns

IBID vs. VRTL - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum IBID drawdown since its inception was -1.28%, smaller than the maximum VRTL drawdown of -60.58%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for IBID and VRTL.

Drawdown Indicators

	IBID	VRTL	Difference
Max Drawdown Largest peak-to-trough decline	-1.28%	-60.58%	+59.30%
Max Drawdown (1Y) Largest decline over 1 year	-0.55%	-47.45%	+46.90%
Current Drawdown Current decline from peak	-0.55%	-34.40%	+33.85%
Average Drawdown Average peak-to-trough decline	-0.22%	-15.99%	+15.77%
Ulcer Index Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks	0.14%	20.32%	-20.18%

Volatility

IBID vs. VRTL - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for iShares iBonds Oct 2027 Term TIPS ETF (IBID) is 0.35%, while GraniteShares 2x Long VRT Daily ETF (VRTL) has a volatility of 43.67%. This indicates that IBID experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than VRTL based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.

Volatility by Period

	IBID	VRTL	Difference
Volatility (1M) Calculated over the trailing 1-month period	0.35%	43.67%	-43.32%
Volatility (6M) Calculated over the trailing 6-month period	0.86%	92.00%	-91.14%
Volatility (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	1.23%	119.79%	-118.56%
Volatility (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized	2.24%	126.68%	-124.44%
Volatility (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized	2.24%	126.68%	-124.44%

IBID vs. VRTL - Expense Ratio Comparison

IBID has a 0.10% expense ratio, which is lower than VRTL's 1.50% expense ratio.

Dividends

IBID vs. VRTL - Dividend Comparison

IBID's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 3.68%, while VRTL has not paid dividends to shareholders.

Position	TTM	2025	2024	2023
IBID iShares iBonds Oct 2027 Term TIPS ETF	3.68%	4.43%	4.24%	0.81%
VRTL GraniteShares 2x Long VRT Daily ETF	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%

Frequently Asked Questions

Can I hold both IBID and VRTL in my portfolio?

IBID and VRTL have a correlation of -0.22, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

Which is riskier, IBID or VRTL?

VRTL has higher volatility (43.67%) compared to IBID (0.35%). In terms of maximum drawdown, IBID dropped -1.28% vs VRTL's -60.58%.

Which ETF is better, IBID or VRTL?

On 1-year performance, VRTL leads with 303.87% vs 4.00% for IBID. On fees, IBID is cheaper at 0.10% per year. On volatility, IBID has been the lower-risk option at 0.35%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Which ETF has performed better, IBID or VRTL?

Over the 1-year period, VRTL has performed better with a 303.87% return vs 4.00%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.

Which ETF is cheaper, IBID or VRTL?

IBID is cheaper with a 0.10% expense ratio, compared with 1.50% for VRTL.

Which ETF pays a higher dividend yield, IBID or VRTL?

IBID has the higher dividend yield at 3.68%, compared with 0.00% for VRTL.

What is the main difference between IBID and VRTL?

IBID is categorized as Inflation-Protected Bonds, while VRTL is Leveraged Equities. They also come from different issuers: iShares and GraniteShares. Their fees differ too: 0.10% for IBID and 1.50% for VRTL.

Which has better risk-adjusted returns?

IBID currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (3.26 vs 2.56), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.