PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
IBID vs. TOV
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

IBID vs. TOV - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in iShares iBonds Oct 2027 Term TIPS ETF (IBID) and JLens 500 Jewish Advocacy U.S. ETF (TOV). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, IBID achieves a 1.94% return, which is significantly lower than TOV's 9.83% return.


IBID

1D
-0.05%
1M
-0.25%
YTD
1.94%
6M
2.03%
1Y
3.92%
3Y*
5Y*
10Y*

TOV

1D
-0.55%
1M
0.06%
YTD
9.83%
6M
9.17%
1Y
26.39%
3Y*
5Y*
10Y*
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

IBID vs. TOV - Yearly Performance Comparison


Correlation

The correlation between IBID and TOV is -0.14, meaning they tend to move in opposite directions. This is especially valuable for risk management - when one declines, the other has historically tended to hold steady or rise.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

-0.14

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Feb 27, 2025

-0.19

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

IBID vs. TOV — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

IBID
IBID Risk / Return Rank: 9595
Overall Rank
IBID Sharpe Ratio Rank: 9494
Sharpe Ratio Rank
IBID Sortino Ratio Rank: 9696
Sortino Ratio Rank
IBID Omega Ratio Rank: 9595
Omega Ratio Rank
IBID Calmar Ratio Rank: 9595
Calmar Ratio Rank
IBID Martin Ratio Rank: 9595
Martin Ratio Rank

TOV
TOV Risk / Return Rank: 6565
Overall Rank
TOV Sharpe Ratio Rank: 6666
Sharpe Ratio Rank
TOV Sortino Ratio Rank: 6363
Sortino Ratio Rank
TOV Omega Ratio Rank: 6464
Omega Ratio Rank
TOV Calmar Ratio Rank: 6262
Calmar Ratio Rank
TOV Martin Ratio Rank: 7171
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

IBID vs. TOV - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for iShares iBonds Oct 2027 Term TIPS ETF (IBID) and JLens 500 Jewish Advocacy U.S. ETF (TOV). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.


IBIDTOVDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

+1.11

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

+2.54

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.72

1.37

+0.34

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

7.20

2.98

+4.22

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

29.14

12.86

+16.28

IBID vs. TOV - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current IBID Sharpe Ratio is 3.19, which is higher than the TOV Sharpe Ratio of 2.08. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of IBID and TOV, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Drawdowns

IBID vs. TOV - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum IBID drawdown since its inception was -1.28%, smaller than the maximum TOV drawdown of -16.97%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for IBID and TOV.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


IBIDTOVDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-1.28%

-16.97%

+15.69%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-0.55%

-8.89%

+8.34%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-0.55%

-1.92%

+1.37%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-0.22%

-2.20%

+1.98%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

0.13%

2.06%

-1.93%

Volatility

IBID vs. TOV - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for iShares iBonds Oct 2027 Term TIPS ETF (IBID) is 0.35%, while JLens 500 Jewish Advocacy U.S. ETF (TOV) has a volatility of 4.49%. This indicates that IBID experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than TOV based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


IBIDTOVDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

0.35%

4.49%

-4.14%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

0.86%

10.11%

-9.25%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

1.23%

12.76%

-11.53%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

2.24%

18.01%

-15.77%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

2.24%

18.01%

-15.77%

IBID vs. TOV - Expense Ratio Comparison

IBID has a 0.10% expense ratio, which is lower than TOV's 0.18% expense ratio. Despite the difference, both funds are considered low-cost compared to the broader market, where average expense ratios usually range from 0.3% to 0.9%.


Dividends

IBID vs. TOV - Dividend Comparison

IBID's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 3.68%, more than TOV's 0.83% yield.


PositionTTM202520242023
IBID
iShares iBonds Oct 2027 Term TIPS ETF
3.68%4.43%4.24%0.81%
TOV
JLens 500 Jewish Advocacy U.S. ETF
0.83%0.76%0.00%0.00%

Frequently Asked Questions


IBID and TOV have a correlation of -0.14, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

TOV has higher volatility (4.49%) compared to IBID (0.35%). In terms of maximum drawdown, IBID dropped -1.28% vs TOV's -16.97%.

On 1-year performance, TOV leads with 26.39% vs 3.92% for IBID. On fees, IBID is cheaper at 0.10% per year. On volatility, IBID has been the lower-risk option at 0.35%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Over the 1-year period, TOV has performed better with a 26.39% return vs 3.92%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.

IBID is cheaper with a 0.10% expense ratio, compared with 0.18% for TOV.

IBID has the higher dividend yield at 3.68%, compared with 0.83% for TOV.

IBID is categorized as Inflation-Protected Bonds, while TOV is Large Cap Blend Equities. IBID tracks ICE 2027 Maturity US Inflation-Linked Treasury Index, while TOV tracks JLens 500 Jewish Advocacy U.S. Index. They also come from different issuers: iShares and JLens. Their fees differ too: 0.10% for IBID and 0.18% for TOV.

IBID currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (3.19 vs 2.08), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for IBID and TOV

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer