IBID vs. QMFE

Last updated Jun 23, 2026

IBID (iShares iBonds Oct 2027 Term TIPS ETF) and QMFE (FT Vest Nasdaq-100 Moderate Buffer ETF - February) are both exchange-traded funds - IBID is a Inflation-Protected Bonds fund tracking the ICE 2027 Maturity US Inflation-Linked Treasury Index, while QMFE is a Defined Outcome fund tracking the Invesco QQQ Trust (QQQ) Price Return. Both are passively managed. Over the past year, IBID returned 4.04% vs 19.86% for QMFE. At a correlation of -0.21, they often move in opposite directions. IBID charges 0.10%/yr vs 0.90%/yr for QMFE.

Performance

IBID vs. QMFE - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in iShares iBonds Oct 2027 Term TIPS ETF (IBID) and FT Vest Nasdaq-100 Moderate Buffer ETF - February (QMFE). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, IBID achieves a 1.99% return, which is significantly lower than QMFE's 8.97% return.

IBID

• 1D: 0.00%
• 1M: -0.19%
• YTD: 1.99%
• 6M: 2.08%
• 1Y: 4.04%
• 3Y*: —
• 5Y*: —
• 10Y*: —

QMFE

• 1D: -0.06%
• 1M: 0.33%
• YTD: 8.97%
• 6M: 9.02%
• 1Y: 19.86%
• 3Y*: —
• 5Y*: —
• 10Y*: —

*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

IBID vs. QMFE - Yearly Performance Comparison

	2026 (YTD)	2025
IBID iShares iBonds Oct 2027 Term TIPS ETF	1.99%	4.21%
QMFE FT Vest Nasdaq-100 Moderate Buffer ETF - February	8.97%	11.47%

Correlation

The correlation between IBID and QMFE is -0.14, meaning they tend to move in opposite directions. This is especially valuable for risk management - when one declines, the other has historically tended to hold steady or rise.

	Correlation
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	-0.14
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Feb 24, 2025	-0.21

Return for Risk

IBID vs. QMFE — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

IBID

IBID Risk / Return Rank: 95
IBID Sharpe Ratio Rank: 93
IBID Sortino Ratio Rank: 96
IBID Omega Ratio Rank: 96
IBID Calmar Ratio Rank: 96
IBID Martin Ratio Rank: 95

QMFE

QMFE Risk / Return Rank: 89
QMFE Sharpe Ratio Rank: 89
QMFE Sortino Ratio Rank: 91
QMFE Omega Ratio Rank: 91
QMFE Calmar Ratio Rank: 81
QMFE Martin Ratio Rank: 93

The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

IBID vs. QMFE - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for iShares iBonds Oct 2027 Term TIPS ETF (IBID) and FT Vest Nasdaq-100 Moderate Buffer ETF - February (QMFE). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.

	IBID	QMFE	Difference
Sharpe ratio: Return per unit of total volatility	3.29	2.81	+0.48
Sortino ratio: Return per unit of downside risk	5.55	4.07	+1.49
Omega ratio: Gain probability vs. loss probability	1.75	1.58	+0.17
Calmar ratio: Return relative to maximum drawdown	8.22	4.15	+4.07
Martin ratio: Return relative to average drawdown	30.99	23.11	+7.88

IBID vs. QMFE - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current IBID Sharpe Ratio is 3.29, which is comparable to the QMFE Sharpe Ratio of 2.81. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of IBID and QMFE, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.

Drawdowns

IBID vs. QMFE - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum IBID drawdown since its inception was -1.28%, smaller than the maximum QMFE drawdown of -11.85%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for IBID and QMFE.

Drawdown Indicators

	IBID	QMFE	Difference
Max Drawdown Largest peak-to-trough decline	-1.28%	-11.85%	+10.57%
Max Drawdown (1Y) Largest decline over 1 year	-0.49%	-4.81%	+4.32%
Current Drawdown Current decline from peak	-0.49%	-0.43%	-0.06%
Average Drawdown Average peak-to-trough decline	-0.22%	-1.10%	+0.88%
Ulcer Index Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks	0.13%	0.86%	-0.73%

Volatility

IBID vs. QMFE - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for iShares iBonds Oct 2027 Term TIPS ETF (IBID) is 0.35%, while FT Vest Nasdaq-100 Moderate Buffer ETF - February (QMFE) has a volatility of 2.19%. This indicates that IBID experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than QMFE based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.

Volatility by Period

	IBID	QMFE	Difference
Volatility (1M) Calculated over the trailing 1-month period	0.35%	2.19%	-1.84%
Volatility (6M) Calculated over the trailing 6-month period	0.86%	5.85%	-4.99%
Volatility (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	1.23%	7.10%	-5.87%
Volatility (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized	2.24%	11.60%	-9.36%
Volatility (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized	2.24%	11.60%	-9.36%

IBID vs. QMFE - Expense Ratio Comparison

IBID has a 0.10% expense ratio, which is lower than QMFE's 0.90% expense ratio.

Dividends

IBID vs. QMFE - Dividend Comparison

IBID's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 3.68%, while QMFE has not paid dividends to shareholders.

Position	TTM	2025	2024	2023
IBID iShares iBonds Oct 2027 Term TIPS ETF	3.68%	4.43%	4.24%	0.81%
QMFE FT Vest Nasdaq-100 Moderate Buffer ETF - February	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%

Frequently Asked Questions

Can I hold both IBID and QMFE in my portfolio?

IBID and QMFE have a correlation of -0.14, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

Which is riskier, IBID or QMFE?

QMFE has higher volatility (2.19%) compared to IBID (0.35%). In terms of maximum drawdown, IBID dropped -1.28% vs QMFE's -11.85%.

Which ETF is better, IBID or QMFE?

On 1-year performance, QMFE leads with 19.86% vs 4.04% for IBID. On fees, IBID is cheaper at 0.10% per year. On volatility, IBID has been the lower-risk option at 0.35%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Which ETF has performed better, IBID or QMFE?

Over the 1-year period, QMFE has performed better with a 19.86% return vs 4.04%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.

Which ETF is cheaper, IBID or QMFE?

IBID is cheaper with a 0.10% expense ratio, compared with 0.90% for QMFE.

Which ETF pays a higher dividend yield, IBID or QMFE?

IBID has the higher dividend yield at 3.68%, compared with 0.00% for QMFE.

What is the main difference between IBID and QMFE?

IBID is categorized as Inflation-Protected Bonds, while QMFE is Defined Outcome. IBID tracks ICE 2027 Maturity US Inflation-Linked Treasury Index, while QMFE tracks Invesco QQQ Trust (QQQ) Price Return. They also come from different issuers: iShares and First Trust. Their fees differ too: 0.10% for IBID and 0.90% for QMFE.

Which has better risk-adjusted returns?

IBID currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (3.29 vs 2.81), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.