PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
IBID vs. DXJ
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

IBID vs. DXJ - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in iShares iBonds Oct 2027 Term TIPS ETF (IBID) and WisdomTree Japan Hedged Equity Fund (DXJ). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, IBID achieves a 2.35% return, which is significantly lower than DXJ's 22.23% return.


IBID

1D
0.06%
1M
-0.06%
6M
2.28%
YTD
2.35%
1Y
3.98%
3Y*
5Y*
10Y*

DXJ

1D
-0.98%
1M
2.95%
6M
14.85%
YTD
22.23%
1Y
54.82%
3Y*
32.72%
5Y*
27.03%
10Y*
18.62%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

IBID vs. DXJ - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)202520242023
IBID
iShares iBonds Oct 2027 Term TIPS ETF
2.35%5.66%4.71%2.61%
DXJ
WisdomTree Japan Hedged Equity Fund
22.23%32.78%29.83%-1.36%

Correlation

The correlation between IBID and DXJ is -0.26, meaning they tend to move in opposite directions. This is especially valuable for risk management - when one declines, the other has historically tended to hold steady or rise.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

-0.26

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Sep 15, 2023

-0.14

The correlation between IBID and DXJ shifts across timeframes, from -0.26 (1 year) to -0.14 (all time), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

IBID vs. DXJ — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

IBID
IBID Risk / Return Rank: 9696
Overall Rank
IBID Sharpe Ratio Rank: 9696
Sharpe Ratio Rank
IBID Sortino Ratio Rank: 9797
Sortino Ratio Rank
IBID Omega Ratio Rank: 9797
Omega Ratio Rank
IBID Calmar Ratio Rank: 9696
Calmar Ratio Rank
IBID Martin Ratio Rank: 9696
Martin Ratio Rank

DXJ
DXJ Risk / Return Rank: 9494
Overall Rank
DXJ Sharpe Ratio Rank: 9595
Sharpe Ratio Rank
DXJ Sortino Ratio Rank: 9494
Sortino Ratio Rank
DXJ Omega Ratio Rank: 9494
Omega Ratio Rank
DXJ Calmar Ratio Rank: 9393
Calmar Ratio Rank
DXJ Martin Ratio Rank: 9393
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

IBID vs. DXJ - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for iShares iBonds Oct 2027 Term TIPS ETF (IBID) and WisdomTree Japan Hedged Equity Fund (DXJ). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.


IBIDDXJDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

+0.22

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

+1.52

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.72

1.54

+0.18

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

7.26

5.02

+2.25

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

25.39

19.10

+6.29

IBID vs. DXJ - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current IBID Sharpe Ratio is 3.23, which is comparable to the DXJ Sharpe Ratio of 3.02. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of IBID and DXJ, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Drawdowns

IBID vs. DXJ - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum IBID drawdown since its inception was -1.28%, smaller than the maximum DXJ drawdown of -49.63%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for IBID and DXJ.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


IBIDDXJDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-1.28%

-49.63%

+48.35%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-0.55%

-10.98%

+10.43%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-22.19%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-22.19%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-39.14%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-0.14%

-2.62%

+2.48%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-0.23%

-14.27%

+14.04%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

0.16%

2.88%

-2.72%

Volatility

IBID vs. DXJ - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for iShares iBonds Oct 2027 Term TIPS ETF (IBID) is 0.39%, while WisdomTree Japan Hedged Equity Fund (DXJ) has a volatility of 6.56%. This indicates that IBID experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than DXJ based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


IBIDDXJDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

0.39%

6.56%

-6.17%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

0.90%

14.47%

-13.57%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

1.24%

18.30%

-17.06%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

2.23%

19.06%

-16.83%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

2.23%

19.93%

-17.70%

IBID vs. DXJ - Expense Ratio Comparison

IBID has a 0.10% expense ratio, which is lower than DXJ's 0.48% expense ratio.


Dividends

IBID vs. DXJ - Dividend Comparison

IBID's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 4.90%, more than DXJ's 0.96% yield.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
DXJ
WisdomTree Japan Hedged Equity Fund
0.96%1.29%3.48%3.44%3.02%2.64%2.53%2.47%2.92%2.30%1.98%5.95%
IBID
iShares iBonds Oct 2027 Term TIPS ETF
4.90%4.43%4.24%0.81%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%

Frequently Asked Questions


IBID and DXJ have a correlation of -0.26, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

DXJ has higher volatility (6.56%) compared to IBID (0.39%). In terms of maximum drawdown, IBID dropped -1.28% vs DXJ's -49.63%.

On 1-year performance, DXJ leads with 54.82% vs 3.98% for IBID. On fees, IBID is cheaper at 0.10% per year. On volatility, IBID has been the lower-risk option at 0.39%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Over the 1-year period, DXJ has performed better with a 54.82% return vs 3.98%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.

IBID is cheaper with a 0.10% expense ratio, compared with 0.48% for DXJ.

IBID has the higher dividend yield at 4.90%, compared with 0.96% for DXJ.

IBID is categorized as Inflation-Protected Bonds, while DXJ is Japan Equities. IBID tracks ICE 2027 Maturity US Inflation-Linked Treasury Index, while DXJ tracks WisdomTree Japan Hedged Equity Index. They also come from different issuers: iShares and WisdomTree. Their fees differ too: 0.10% for IBID and 0.48% for DXJ.

IBID currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (3.23 vs 3.02), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for IBID and DXJ

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer