IBHL vs. IWM
IBHL (iShares iBonds 2032 Term High Yield and Income ETF) and IWM (iShares Russell 2000 ETF) are both exchange-traded funds - IBHL is a High Yield Bonds fund tracking the Bloomberg 2032 Term High Yield and Income Index, while IWM is a Small Cap Blend Equities fund tracking the Russell 2000 Index. Both are passively managed. Over the past year, IBHL returned 6.07% vs 39.77% for IWM. A 0.71 correlation means they provide meaningful diversification when combined. IBHL charges 0.35%/yr vs 0.19%/yr for IWM.
Performance
IBHL vs. IWM - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, IBHL achieves a 1.17% return, which is significantly lower than IWM's 21.03% return.
IBHL
- 1D
- 0.08%
- 1M
- 0.68%
- YTD
- 1.17%
- 6M
- 1.25%
- 1Y
- 6.07%
- 3Y*
- —
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
IWM
- 1D
- 0.46%
- 1M
- 4.31%
- YTD
- 21.03%
- 6M
- 17.89%
- 1Y
- 39.77%
- 3Y*
- 19.40%
- 5Y*
- 6.33%
- 10Y*
- 11.63%
IBHL vs. IWM - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | |
|---|---|---|
IBHL iShares iBonds 2032 Term High Yield and Income ETF | 1.17% | 8.46% |
IWM iShares Russell 2000 ETF | 21.03% | 19.58% |
Correlation
The correlation between IBHL and IWM is 0.68, which is moderate. They share some common price drivers but move independently often enough to provide real diversification benefit when combined.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.68 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Mar 26, 2025 | 0.71 |
The correlation between IBHL and IWM has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.68 to 0.71 - a consistent structural relationship.
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
IBHL vs. IWM — Risk / Return Rank
IBHL
IWM
IBHL vs. IWM - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for iShares iBonds 2032 Term High Yield and Income ETF (IBHL) and iShares Russell 2000 ETF (IWM). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.
| IBHL | IWM | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | -0.55 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | -0.56 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.28 | 1.33 | -0.05 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 2.01 | 3.62 | -1.61 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 8.81 | 12.82 | -4.01 |
Loading charts...
Drawdowns
IBHL vs. IWM - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum IBHL drawdown since its inception was -3.70%, smaller than the maximum IWM drawdown of -59.05%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for IBHL and IWM.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| IBHL | IWM | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -3.70% | -59.05% | +55.35% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -3.03% | -11.03% | +8.00% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | — | -27.50% | — |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | — | -31.91% | — |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | — | -41.13% | — |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -0.15% | -0.50% | +0.35% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -0.45% | -10.74% | +10.29% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 0.69% | 3.11% | -2.42% |
Volatility
IBHL vs. IWM - Volatility Comparison
The current volatility for iShares iBonds 2032 Term High Yield and Income ETF (IBHL) is 1.15%, while iShares Russell 2000 ETF (IWM) has a volatility of 6.52%. This indicates that IBHL experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than IWM based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| IBHL | IWM | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 1.15% | 6.52% | -5.37% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 3.31% | 14.30% | -10.99% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 4.15% | 19.71% | -15.56% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 5.36% | 22.60% | -17.24% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 5.36% | 23.06% | -17.70% |
IBHL vs. IWM - Expense Ratio Comparison
IBHL has a 0.35% expense ratio, which is higher than IWM's 0.19% expense ratio.
Dividends
IBHL vs. IWM - Dividend Comparison
IBHL's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 6.28%, more than IWM's 0.90% yield.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
IBHL iShares iBonds 2032 Term High Yield and Income ETF | 6.28% | 4.90% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
IWM iShares Russell 2000 ETF | 0.90% | 1.04% | 1.15% | 1.35% | 1.48% | 0.94% | 1.04% | 1.26% | 1.40% | 1.26% | 1.38% | 1.54% |
Frequently Asked Questions
IBHL and IWM have a correlation of 0.68, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
IWM has higher volatility (6.52%) compared to IBHL (1.15%). In terms of maximum drawdown, IBHL dropped -3.70% vs IWM's -59.05%.
On 1-year performance, IWM leads with 39.77% vs 6.07% for IBHL. On fees, IWM is cheaper at 0.19% per year. On volatility, IBHL has been the lower-risk option at 1.15%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
Over the 1-year period, IWM has performed better with a 39.77% return vs 6.07%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.
IWM is cheaper with a 0.19% expense ratio, compared with 0.35% for IBHL.
IBHL has the higher dividend yield at 6.28%, compared with 0.90% for IWM.
IBHL is categorized as High Yield Bonds, while IWM is Small Cap Blend Equities. IBHL tracks Bloomberg 2032 Term High Yield and Income Index, while IWM tracks Russell 2000 Index. Their fees differ too: 0.35% for IBHL and 0.19% for IWM.
IWM currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (2.03 vs 1.48), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.
Find the right allocation for IBHL and IWM
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer