PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
IBHI vs. NEM
Performance
Return for Risk
Dividends
Drawdowns
Volatility

Performance

IBHI vs. NEM - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in iShares iBonds 2029 Term High Yield and Income ETF (IBHI) and Newmont Goldcorp Corporation (NEM). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading graphics...

IBHI vs. NEM - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)2025202420232022
IBHI
iShares iBonds 2029 Term High Yield and Income ETF
-0.24%7.88%8.33%14.21%-8.52%
NEM
Newmont Goldcorp Corporation
14.19%172.82%-7.83%-8.76%-36.86%

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, IBHI achieves a -0.24% return, which is significantly lower than NEM's 14.19% return.


IBHI

1D
0.13%
1M
-0.20%
YTD
-0.24%
6M
0.93%
1Y
7.11%
3Y*
8.32%
5Y*
10Y*

NEM

1D
5.12%
1M
-11.43%
YTD
14.19%
6M
33.04%
1Y
138.70%
3Y*
35.70%
5Y*
16.43%
10Y*
18.49%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

IBHI vs. NEM — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

IBHI
IBHI Risk / Return Rank: 6868
Overall Rank
IBHI Sharpe Ratio Rank: 6666
Sharpe Ratio Rank
IBHI Sortino Ratio Rank: 6666
Sortino Ratio Rank
IBHI Omega Ratio Rank: 7070
Omega Ratio Rank
IBHI Calmar Ratio Rank: 6161
Calmar Ratio Rank
IBHI Martin Ratio Rank: 7979
Martin Ratio Rank

NEM
NEM Risk / Return Rank: 9494
Overall Rank
NEM Sharpe Ratio Rank: 9696
Sharpe Ratio Rank
NEM Sortino Ratio Rank: 9191
Sortino Ratio Rank
NEM Omega Ratio Rank: 9292
Omega Ratio Rank
NEM Calmar Ratio Rank: 9393
Calmar Ratio Rank
NEM Martin Ratio Rank: 9595
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

IBHI vs. NEM - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for iShares iBonds 2029 Term High Yield and Income ETF (IBHI) and Newmont Goldcorp Corporation (NEM). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


IBHINEMDifference

Sharpe ratio

Return per unit of total volatility

1.22

3.02

-1.80

Sortino ratio

Return per unit of downside risk

1.74

3.05

-1.31

Omega ratio

Gain probability vs. loss probability

1.27

1.44

-0.18

Calmar ratio

Return relative to maximum drawdown

1.66

5.09

-3.43

Martin ratio

Return relative to average drawdown

9.17

16.88

-7.71

IBHI vs. NEM - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current IBHI Sharpe Ratio is 1.22, which is lower than the NEM Sharpe Ratio of 3.02. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of IBHI and NEM, offering insights into how both investments have performed under varying market conditions. These values are calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months.


Loading graphics...

Sharpe Ratios by Period


IBHINEMDifference

Sharpe Ratio (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

1.22

3.02

-1.80

Sharpe Ratio (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.45

Sharpe Ratio (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.52

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

0.62

0.13

+0.48

Correlation

The correlation between IBHI and NEM is 0.28, which is considered to be low. This implies their price changes are not closely related. A low correlation is generally favorable for portfolio diversification, as it helps to reduce overall risk by spreading it across multiple assets with different performance patterns.


Dividends

IBHI vs. NEM - Dividend Comparison

IBHI's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 6.88%, more than NEM's 0.89% yield.


TTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
IBHI
iShares iBonds 2029 Term High Yield and Income ETF
6.88%6.79%6.66%6.48%5.26%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%
NEM
Newmont Goldcorp Corporation
0.89%1.00%2.69%3.87%4.66%3.55%1.74%3.31%1.62%0.67%0.37%0.56%

Drawdowns

IBHI vs. NEM - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum IBHI drawdown since its inception was -13.65%, smaller than the maximum NEM drawdown of -81.30%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for IBHI and NEM.


Loading graphics...

Drawdown Indicators


IBHINEMDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-13.65%

-81.30%

+67.65%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-4.48%

-27.25%

+22.77%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-62.40%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-62.40%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-0.89%

-13.59%

+12.70%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-2.96%

-41.49%

+38.53%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

0.81%

8.22%

-7.41%

Volatility

IBHI vs. NEM - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for iShares iBonds 2029 Term High Yield and Income ETF (IBHI) is 2.02%, while Newmont Goldcorp Corporation (NEM) has a volatility of 14.22%. This indicates that IBHI experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than NEM based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading graphics...

Volatility by Period


IBHINEMDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

2.02%

14.22%

-12.20%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

2.84%

37.77%

-34.93%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

5.87%

46.28%

-40.41%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

8.12%

36.92%

-28.80%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

8.12%

35.68%

-27.56%