IBHI vs. LDRH

Last updated Jun 5, 2026

IBHI (iShares iBonds 2029 Term High Yield and Income ETF) and LDRH (iShares iBonds 1-5 Year High Yield and Income Ladder ETF) are both High Yield Bonds funds from iShares - IBHI tracks the Bloomberg 2029 Term High Yield and Income Index - Benchmark TR Gross while LDRH tracks the BlackRock iBonds 1-5 Year High Yield and Income Ladder Index. Both are passively managed. Over the past year, IBHI returned 6.99% vs 6.30% for LDRH. A 0.80 correlation means they provide meaningful diversification when combined. Both charge a 0.35% expense ratio.

Performance

IBHI vs. LDRH - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in iShares iBonds 2029 Term High Yield and Income ETF (IBHI) and iShares iBonds 1-5 Year High Yield and Income Ladder ETF (LDRH). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, IBHI achieves a 1.61% return, which is significantly lower than LDRH's 1.88% return.

IBHI

• 1D: 0.09%
• 1M: 0.50%
• YTD: 1.61%
• 6M: 2.21%
• 1Y: 6.99%
• 3Y*: 9.00%
• 5Y*: —
• 10Y*: —

LDRH

• 1D: 0.08%
• 1M: 0.29%
• YTD: 1.88%
• 6M: 2.45%
• 1Y: 6.30%
• 3Y*: —
• 5Y*: —
• 10Y*: —

*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

IBHI vs. LDRH - Yearly Performance Comparison

	2026 (YTD)	2025	2024
IBHI iShares iBonds 2029 Term High Yield and Income ETF	1.61%	7.88%	-0.26%
LDRH iShares iBonds 1-5 Year High Yield and Income Ladder ETF	1.88%	7.18%	0.21%

Correlation

The correlation between IBHI and LDRH is 0.80, indicating a strong positive relationship between their price movements. Combining them offers limited diversification - they tend to fall together during downturns.

	Correlation
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	0.80
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Nov 11, 2024	0.80

The correlation between IBHI and LDRH has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.80 to 0.80 - a consistent structural relationship.

IBHI vs. LDRH - Sectors Allocation Comparison

Sectors	IBHI	LDRH
Energy	100.0%	100.0%
Basic Materials	-	-
Communication Services	-	-
Consumer Cyclical	-	-
Consumer Defensive	-	-
Financial Services	-	-
Healthcare	-	-
Industrials	-	-
Real Estate	-	-
Technology	-	-
Utilities	-	-

Return for Risk

IBHI vs. LDRH — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

IBHI

IBHI Risk / Return Rank: 64
IBHI Sharpe Ratio Rank: 55
IBHI Sortino Ratio Rank: 61
IBHI Omega Ratio Rank: 57
IBHI Calmar Ratio Rank: 68
IBHI Martin Ratio Rank: 77

LDRH

LDRH Risk / Return Rank: 85
LDRH Sharpe Ratio Rank: 76
LDRH Sortino Ratio Rank: 88
LDRH Omega Ratio Rank: 81
LDRH Calmar Ratio Rank: 88
LDRH Martin Ratio Rank: 91

The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

IBHI vs. LDRH - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for iShares iBonds 2029 Term High Yield and Income ETF (IBHI) and iShares iBonds 1-5 Year High Yield and Income Ladder ETF (LDRH). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

	IBHI	LDRH	Difference
Sharpe ratio: Return per unit of total volatility	1.85	2.43	-0.59
Sortino ratio: Return per unit of downside risk	2.85	3.92	-1.07
Omega ratio: Gain probability vs. loss probability	1.35	1.48	-0.13
Calmar ratio: Return relative to maximum drawdown	3.33	5.14	-1.81
Martin ratio: Return relative to average drawdown	14.61	21.43	-6.82
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month.

IBHI vs. LDRH - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current IBHI Sharpe Ratio is 1.85, which is comparable to the LDRH Sharpe Ratio of 2.43. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of IBHI and LDRH, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.

Sharpe Ratios by Period

	IBHI	LDRH	Difference
Sharpe Ratio (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	1.85	2.43	-0.59
Sharpe Ratio (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history	0.66	1.70	-1.04

Drawdowns

IBHI vs. LDRH - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum IBHI drawdown since its inception was -13.65%, which is greater than LDRH's maximum drawdown of -3.17%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for IBHI and LDRH.

Drawdown Indicators

	IBHI	LDRH	Difference
Max Drawdown Largest peak-to-trough decline	-13.65%	-3.17%	-10.48%
Max Drawdown (1Y) Largest decline over 1 year	-2.11%	-1.23%	-0.88%
Max Drawdown (3Y) Largest decline over 3 years	-5.73%	—	—
Current Drawdown Current decline from peak	-0.09%	-0.12%	+0.03%
Average Drawdown Average peak-to-trough decline	-2.84%	-0.24%	-2.60%
Ulcer Index Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks	0.48%	0.30%	+0.18%

Volatility

IBHI vs. LDRH - Volatility Comparison

iShares iBonds 2029 Term High Yield and Income ETF (IBHI) has a higher volatility of 0.92% compared to iShares iBonds 1-5 Year High Yield and Income Ladder ETF (LDRH) at 0.69%. This indicates that IBHI's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than LDRH based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.

Volatility by Period

	IBHI	LDRH	Difference
Volatility (1M) Calculated over the trailing 1-month period	0.92%	0.69%	+0.23%
Volatility (6M) Calculated over the trailing 6-month period	2.77%	1.97%	+0.80%
Volatility (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	3.81%	2.61%	+1.20%
Volatility (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized	7.98%	3.51%	+4.47%
Volatility (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized	7.98%	3.51%	+4.47%

IBHI vs. LDRH - Expense Ratio Comparison

Both IBHI and LDRH have an expense ratio of 0.35%.

Dividends

IBHI vs. LDRH - Dividend Comparison

IBHI's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 6.69%, less than LDRH's 6.99% yield.

Position	TTM	2025	2024	2023	2022
IBHI iShares iBonds 2029 Term High Yield and Income ETF	6.69%	6.79%	6.66%	6.48%	5.26%
LDRH iShares iBonds 1-5 Year High Yield and Income Ladder ETF	6.99%	6.41%	1.13%	0.00%	0.00%

Frequently Asked Questions

Can I hold both IBHI and LDRH in my portfolio?

IBHI and LDRH have a correlation of 0.80, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

Which is riskier, IBHI or LDRH?

IBHI has higher volatility (0.92%) compared to LDRH (0.69%). In terms of maximum drawdown, IBHI dropped -13.65% vs LDRH's -3.17%.

Which ETF is better, IBHI or LDRH?

On 1-year performance, IBHI leads with 6.99% vs 6.30% for LDRH. Both ETFs have the same 0.35% expense ratio. On volatility, LDRH has been the lower-risk option at 0.69%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Which ETF has performed better, IBHI or LDRH?

Over the 1-year period, IBHI has performed better with a 6.99% return vs 6.30%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.

Which ETF is cheaper, IBHI or LDRH?

IBHI and LDRH have the same expense ratio: 0.35% per year.

Which ETF pays a higher dividend yield, IBHI or LDRH?

LDRH has the higher dividend yield at 6.99%, compared with 6.69% for IBHI.

What is the main difference between IBHI and LDRH?

IBHI tracks Bloomberg 2029 Term High Yield and Income Index - Benchmark TR Gross, while LDRH tracks BlackRock iBonds 1-5 Year High Yield and Income Ladder Index.

Which has better risk-adjusted returns?

LDRH currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (2.43 vs 1.85), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.