IBHH vs. XHYH

Last updated Jun 4, 2026

IBHH (iShares iBonds 2028 Term High Yield and Income ETF) and XHYH (BondBloxx US High Yield Healthcare Sector ETF) are both High Yield Bonds funds - IBHH tracks the Bloomberg 2028 Term High Yield and Income Index - Benchmark TR Gross while XHYH tracks the ICE Diversified US Cash Pay High Yield Healthcare Index. Both are passively managed. Over the past 3 years, IBHH returned 8.48%/yr vs 9.88%/yr for XHYH. A 0.79 correlation means they provide meaningful diversification when combined. Both charge a 0.35% expense ratio.

Performance

IBHH vs. XHYH - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in iShares iBonds 2028 Term High Yield and Income ETF (IBHH) and BondBloxx US High Yield Healthcare Sector ETF (XHYH). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, IBHH achieves a 1.66% return, which is significantly higher than XHYH's 1.24% return.

IBHH

• 1D: -0.06%
• 1M: 0.40%
• YTD: 1.66%
• 6M: 2.20%
• 1Y: 6.59%
• 3Y*: 8.48%
• 5Y*: —
• 10Y*: —

XHYH

• 1D: 0.00%
• 1M: -0.31%
• YTD: 1.24%
• 6M: 1.22%
• 1Y: 7.57%
• 3Y*: 9.88%
• 5Y*: —
• 10Y*: —

*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

IBHH vs. XHYH - Yearly Performance Comparison

	2026 (YTD)	2025	2024	2023	2022
IBHH iShares iBonds 2028 Term High Yield and Income ETF	1.66%	8.02%	7.53%	12.87%	-6.70%
XHYH BondBloxx US High Yield Healthcare Sector ETF	1.24%	10.30%	9.65%	12.93%	-12.25%

Correlation

The correlation between IBHH and XHYH is 0.36, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.

	Correlation
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	0.36
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period	0.68
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Mar 11, 2022	0.79

Over the past year, the correlation between IBHH and XHYH has dropped to 0.36 - well below their long-term average of 0.79, suggesting their price drivers have been diverging.

Return for Risk

IBHH vs. XHYH — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

IBHH

IBHH Risk / Return Rank: 82
IBHH Sharpe Ratio Rank: 72
IBHH Sortino Ratio Rank: 80
IBHH Omega Ratio Rank: 77
IBHH Calmar Ratio Rank: 89
IBHH Martin Ratio Rank: 91

XHYH

XHYH Risk / Return Rank: 62
XHYH Sharpe Ratio Rank: 55
XHYH Sortino Ratio Rank: 66
XHYH Omega Ratio Rank: 61
XHYH Calmar Ratio Rank: 63
XHYH Martin Ratio Rank: 67

The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

IBHH vs. XHYH - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for iShares iBonds 2028 Term High Yield and Income ETF (IBHH) and BondBloxx US High Yield Healthcare Sector ETF (XHYH). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

	IBHH	XHYH	Difference
Sharpe ratio: Return per unit of total volatility	2.35	1.88	+0.47
Sortino ratio: Return per unit of downside risk	3.60	3.06	+0.54
Omega ratio: Gain probability vs. loss probability	1.46	1.37	+0.09
Calmar ratio: Return relative to maximum drawdown	5.41	3.09	+2.32
Martin ratio: Return relative to average drawdown	21.70	12.30	+9.40
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month.

IBHH vs. XHYH - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current IBHH Sharpe Ratio is 2.35, which is comparable to the XHYH Sharpe Ratio of 1.88. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of IBHH and XHYH, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.

Sharpe Ratios by Period

	IBHH	XHYH	Difference
Sharpe Ratio (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	2.35	1.88	+0.47
Sharpe Ratio (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history	0.73	0.53	+0.20

Drawdowns

IBHH vs. XHYH - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum IBHH drawdown since its inception was -12.05%, smaller than the maximum XHYH drawdown of -17.84%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for IBHH and XHYH.

Drawdown Indicators

	IBHH	XHYH	Difference
Max Drawdown Largest peak-to-trough decline	-12.05%	-17.84%	+5.79%
Max Drawdown (1Y) Largest decline over 1 year	-1.22%	-2.62%	+1.40%
Max Drawdown (3Y) Largest decline over 3 years	-4.66%	-5.09%	+0.43%
Current Drawdown Current decline from peak	-0.07%	-0.51%	+0.44%
Average Drawdown Average peak-to-trough decline	-2.30%	-4.62%	+2.32%
Ulcer Index Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks	0.30%	0.66%	-0.36%

Volatility

IBHH vs. XHYH - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for iShares iBonds 2028 Term High Yield and Income ETF (IBHH) is 0.77%, while BondBloxx US High Yield Healthcare Sector ETF (XHYH) has a volatility of 0.87%. This indicates that IBHH experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than XHYH based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.

Volatility by Period

	IBHH	XHYH	Difference
Volatility (1M) Calculated over the trailing 1-month period	0.77%	0.87%	-0.10%
Volatility (6M) Calculated over the trailing 6-month period	2.08%	3.15%	-1.07%
Volatility (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	2.82%	4.32%	-1.50%
Volatility (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized	7.26%	8.55%	-1.29%
Volatility (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized	7.26%	8.55%	-1.29%

IBHH vs. XHYH - Expense Ratio Comparison

Both IBHH and XHYH have an expense ratio of 0.35%.

Dividends

IBHH vs. XHYH - Dividend Comparison

IBHH's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 6.27%, less than XHYH's 6.58% yield.

Position	TTM	2025	2024	2023	2022
IBHH iShares iBonds 2028 Term High Yield and Income ETF	6.27%	6.39%	6.93%	6.65%	5.36%
XHYH BondBloxx US High Yield Healthcare Sector ETF	6.58%	6.95%	6.95%	7.73%	6.99%

Frequently Asked Questions

Can I hold both IBHH and XHYH in my portfolio?

IBHH and XHYH have a correlation of 0.36, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

Which is riskier, IBHH or XHYH?

XHYH has higher volatility (0.87%) compared to IBHH (0.77%). In terms of maximum drawdown, IBHH dropped -12.05% vs XHYH's -17.84%.

Which ETF is better, IBHH or XHYH?

On 3-year performance, XHYH leads with 9.88% vs 8.48% for IBHH. Both ETFs have the same 0.35% expense ratio. Their volatility is very similar. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Which ETF has performed better, IBHH or XHYH?

Over the 3-year period, XHYH has performed better with a 9.88% return vs 8.48%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.

Which ETF is cheaper, IBHH or XHYH?

IBHH and XHYH have the same expense ratio: 0.35% per year.

Which ETF pays a higher dividend yield, IBHH or XHYH?

XHYH has the higher dividend yield at 6.58%, compared with 6.27% for IBHH.

What is the main difference between IBHH and XHYH?

IBHH tracks Bloomberg 2028 Term High Yield and Income Index - Benchmark TR Gross, while XHYH tracks ICE Diversified US Cash Pay High Yield Healthcare Index. They also come from different issuers: iShares and BondBloxx.

Which has better risk-adjusted returns?

IBHH currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (2.35 vs 1.88), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.