IBHG vs. LDRH

Last updated Jun 5, 2026

IBHG (iShares iBonds 2027 Term High Yield and Income ETF) and LDRH (iShares iBonds 1-5 Year High Yield and Income Ladder ETF) are both High Yield Bonds funds from iShares - IBHG tracks the Bloomberg 2027 Term High Yield and Income Index - Benchmark TR Gross while LDRH tracks the BlackRock iBonds 1-5 Year High Yield and Income Ladder Index. Both are passively managed. Over the past year, IBHG returned 4.71% vs 6.30% for LDRH. A 0.71 correlation means they provide meaningful diversification when combined. Both charge a 0.35% expense ratio.

Performance

IBHG vs. LDRH - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in iShares iBonds 2027 Term High Yield and Income ETF (IBHG) and iShares iBonds 1-5 Year High Yield and Income Ladder ETF (LDRH). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, IBHG achieves a 1.10% return, which is significantly lower than LDRH's 1.88% return.

IBHG

• 1D: 0.14%
• 1M: 0.32%
• YTD: 1.10%
• 6M: 1.57%
• 1Y: 4.71%
• 3Y*: 7.53%
• 5Y*: —
• 10Y*: —

LDRH

• 1D: 0.08%
• 1M: 0.29%
• YTD: 1.88%
• 6M: 2.45%
• 1Y: 6.30%
• 3Y*: —
• 5Y*: —
• 10Y*: —

*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

IBHG vs. LDRH - Yearly Performance Comparison

	2026 (YTD)	2025	2024
IBHG iShares iBonds 2027 Term High Yield and Income ETF	1.10%	6.90%	-0.02%
LDRH iShares iBonds 1-5 Year High Yield and Income Ladder ETF	1.88%	7.18%	0.21%

Correlation

The correlation between IBHG and LDRH is 0.65, which is moderate. They share some common price drivers but move independently often enough to provide real diversification benefit when combined.

	Correlation
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	0.65
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Nov 11, 2024	0.71

The correlation between IBHG and LDRH has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.65 to 0.71 - a consistent structural relationship.

Return for Risk

IBHG vs. LDRH — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

IBHG

IBHG Risk / Return Rank: 81
IBHG Sharpe Ratio Rank: 69
IBHG Sortino Ratio Rank: 79
IBHG Omega Ratio Rank: 73
IBHG Calmar Ratio Rank: 93
IBHG Martin Ratio Rank: 93

LDRH

LDRH Risk / Return Rank: 85
LDRH Sharpe Ratio Rank: 76
LDRH Sortino Ratio Rank: 88
LDRH Omega Ratio Rank: 81
LDRH Calmar Ratio Rank: 88
LDRH Martin Ratio Rank: 91

The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

IBHG vs. LDRH - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for iShares iBonds 2027 Term High Yield and Income ETF (IBHG) and iShares iBonds 1-5 Year High Yield and Income Ladder ETF (LDRH). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

	IBHG	LDRH	Difference
Sharpe ratio: Return per unit of total volatility	2.24	2.43	-0.19
Sortino ratio: Return per unit of downside risk	3.49	3.92	-0.42
Omega ratio: Gain probability vs. loss probability	1.43	1.48	-0.05
Calmar ratio: Return relative to maximum drawdown	6.51	5.14	+1.37
Martin ratio: Return relative to average drawdown	23.87	21.43	+2.44
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month.

IBHG vs. LDRH - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current IBHG Sharpe Ratio is 2.24, which is comparable to the LDRH Sharpe Ratio of 2.43. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of IBHG and LDRH, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.

Sharpe Ratios by Period

	IBHG	LDRH	Difference
Sharpe Ratio (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	2.24	2.43	-0.19
Sharpe Ratio (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history	0.57	1.70	-1.13

Drawdowns

IBHG vs. LDRH - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum IBHG drawdown since its inception was -13.85%, which is greater than LDRH's maximum drawdown of -3.17%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for IBHG and LDRH.

Drawdown Indicators

	IBHG	LDRH	Difference
Max Drawdown Largest peak-to-trough decline	-13.85%	-3.17%	-10.68%
Max Drawdown (1Y) Largest decline over 1 year	-0.73%	-1.23%	+0.50%
Max Drawdown (3Y) Largest decline over 3 years	-3.39%	—	—
Current Drawdown Current decline from peak	-0.09%	-0.12%	+0.03%
Average Drawdown Average peak-to-trough decline	-2.67%	-0.24%	-2.43%
Ulcer Index Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks	0.20%	0.30%	-0.10%

Volatility

IBHG vs. LDRH - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for iShares iBonds 2027 Term High Yield and Income ETF (IBHG) is 0.59%, while iShares iBonds 1-5 Year High Yield and Income Ladder ETF (LDRH) has a volatility of 0.69%. This indicates that IBHG experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than LDRH based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.

Volatility by Period

	IBHG	LDRH	Difference
Volatility (1M) Calculated over the trailing 1-month period	0.59%	0.69%	-0.10%
Volatility (6M) Calculated over the trailing 6-month period	1.53%	1.97%	-0.44%
Volatility (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	2.11%	2.61%	-0.50%
Volatility (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized	6.36%	3.51%	+2.85%
Volatility (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized	6.36%	3.51%	+2.85%

IBHG vs. LDRH - Expense Ratio Comparison

Both IBHG and LDRH have an expense ratio of 0.35%.

Dividends

IBHG vs. LDRH - Dividend Comparison

IBHG's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 6.07%, less than LDRH's 6.99% yield.

Position	TTM	2025	2024	2023	2022	2021
IBHG iShares iBonds 2027 Term High Yield and Income ETF	6.07%	6.33%	7.02%	6.66%	5.62%	2.13%
LDRH iShares iBonds 1-5 Year High Yield and Income Ladder ETF	6.99%	6.41%	1.13%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%

Frequently Asked Questions

Can I hold both IBHG and LDRH in my portfolio?

IBHG and LDRH have a correlation of 0.65, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

Which is riskier, IBHG or LDRH?

LDRH has higher volatility (0.69%) compared to IBHG (0.59%). In terms of maximum drawdown, IBHG dropped -13.85% vs LDRH's -3.17%.

Which ETF is better, IBHG or LDRH?

On 1-year performance, LDRH leads with 6.30% vs 4.71% for IBHG. Both ETFs have the same 0.35% expense ratio. On volatility, IBHG has been the lower-risk option at 0.59%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Which ETF has performed better, IBHG or LDRH?

Over the 1-year period, LDRH has performed better with a 6.30% return vs 4.71%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.

Which ETF is cheaper, IBHG or LDRH?

IBHG and LDRH have the same expense ratio: 0.35% per year.

Which ETF pays a higher dividend yield, IBHG or LDRH?

LDRH has the higher dividend yield at 6.99%, compared with 6.07% for IBHG.

What is the main difference between IBHG and LDRH?

IBHG tracks Bloomberg 2027 Term High Yield and Income Index - Benchmark TR Gross, while LDRH tracks BlackRock iBonds 1-5 Year High Yield and Income Ladder Index.

Which has better risk-adjusted returns?

LDRH currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (2.43 vs 2.24), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.