IBHG vs. CPHY
IBHG (iShares iBonds 2027 Term High Yield and Income ETF) and CPHY (F/m Compoundr High Yield Bond ETF) are both High Yield Bonds funds - IBHG tracks the Bloomberg 2027 Term High Yield and Income Index - Benchmark TR Gross while CPHY tracks the Nasdaq Compoundr U.S. High Yield Bond Index. Both are passively managed. A 0.73 correlation means they provide meaningful diversification when combined. Both charge a 0.35% expense ratio.
Performance
IBHG vs. CPHY - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, IBHG achieves a 1.10% return, which is significantly higher than CPHY's 0.42% return.
IBHG
- 1D
- 0.14%
- 1M
- 0.32%
- YTD
- 1.10%
- 6M
- 1.57%
- 1Y
- 4.71%
- 3Y*
- 7.53%
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
CPHY
- 1D
- 0.17%
- 1M
- 0.38%
- YTD
- 0.42%
- 6M
- 0.83%
- 1Y
- —
- 3Y*
- —
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
IBHG vs. CPHY - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | |
|---|---|---|
IBHG iShares iBonds 2027 Term High Yield and Income ETF | 1.10% | 2.07% |
CPHY F/m Compoundr High Yield Bond ETF | 0.42% | 2.31% |
Correlation
The correlation between IBHG and CPHY is 0.73, which is moderate. They share some common price drivers but move independently often enough to provide real diversification benefit when combined.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Aug 13, 2025 | 0.73 |
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
IBHG vs. CPHY — Risk / Return Rank
IBHG
CPHY
IBHG vs. CPHY - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for iShares iBonds 2027 Term High Yield and Income ETF (IBHG) and F/m Compoundr High Yield Bond ETF (CPHY). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
| IBHG | CPHY | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | — | — | |
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | — | — | |
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.43 | — | — |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 6.51 | — | — |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 23.87 | — | — |
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month. | |||
Loading charts...
Sharpe Ratios by Period
| IBHG | CPHY | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe Ratio (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 2.24 | — | — |
Sharpe Ratio (All Time)Calculated using the full available price history | 0.57 | 0.95 | -0.38 |
Drawdowns
IBHG vs. CPHY - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum IBHG drawdown since its inception was -13.85%, which is greater than CPHY's maximum drawdown of -2.51%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for IBHG and CPHY.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| IBHG | CPHY | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -13.85% | -2.51% | -11.34% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -0.73% | — | — |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -3.39% | — | — |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -0.09% | -0.57% | +0.48% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -2.67% | -0.56% | -2.11% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 0.20% | — | — |
Volatility
IBHG vs. CPHY - Volatility Comparison
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| IBHG | CPHY | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 0.59% | — | — |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 1.53% | — | — |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 2.11% | 3.58% | -1.47% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 6.36% | 3.58% | +2.78% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 6.36% | 3.58% | +2.78% |
IBHG vs. CPHY - Expense Ratio Comparison
Both IBHG and CPHY have an expense ratio of 0.35%.
Dividends
IBHG vs. CPHY - Dividend Comparison
IBHG's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 6.07%, while CPHY has not paid dividends to shareholders.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
CPHY F/m Compoundr High Yield Bond ETF | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
IBHG iShares iBonds 2027 Term High Yield and Income ETF | 6.07% | 6.33% | 7.02% | 6.66% | 5.62% | 2.13% |
Frequently Asked Questions
IBHG and CPHY have a correlation of 0.73, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
Both ETFs have the same 0.35% expense ratio. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
IBHG and CPHY have the same expense ratio: 0.35% per year.
IBHG has the higher dividend yield at 6.07%, compared with 0.00% for CPHY.
IBHG tracks Bloomberg 2027 Term High Yield and Income Index - Benchmark TR Gross, while CPHY tracks Nasdaq Compoundr U.S. High Yield Bond Index. They also come from different issuers: iShares and F/m Investments.
Find the right allocation for IBHG and CPHY
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer